<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Chris,<br><br>Or is it Taro? Either way, your anti-levy arguments were mirrored quite accurately in Dale Courtney's blog. Perhaps you even formed yours by reading his. No matter. What does matter is that in response to Dale's snarky challenge for liberals to answer his questions -- questions he posted in response to my "diatribe" -- I answered what I could and sent them to him directly, with a request that he post my answers.<br><br>Not only did he not do that, but he pulled his original commentary on my post, then, shamed by this little gal here, put it back -- still without my answers as of last night. <br><br>He is a coward. You are, too.<br><br>keely<br><br><br><br><br>> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:56:22 -0800<br>> From: ophite@gmail.com<br>> To: christopher.witmer@mizuho-sc.com<br>> CC: vision2020@moscow.com<br>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Strange response to cogent argumentation<br>> <br>> Chris --<br>> <br>> Frankly, I think it's better for all of us if we don't even respond.<br>> <br>> I think virtually everything you've said on the Viz is self-evidently<br>> ethically abominable. The more you talk, the better we look.<br>> <br>> -- ACS<br>> <br>> On Nov 12, 2007 8:41 PM, Christopher Witmer<br>> <christopher.witmer@mizuho-sc.com> wrote:<br>> > Regarding my refutation of Mr. Campbell's flawed argumentation in favor of<br>> > the levy, proponents of the levy on V2020 have taken the following approach:<br>> ><br>> > 1) Totally ignore the content of my post.<br>> > 2) Shift the focus instead to something totally unrelated and totally<br>> > irrelevant to the substance of the post: focus on personalities rather than<br>> > issues.<br>> ><br>> > Nobody has even interacted with, much less refuted, a single thing that I<br>> > wrote concerning Mr. Campbell's flawed arguments in favor of the levy. If<br>> > you go back and re-read my post you will see that I focused exclusively on<br>> > the substance of Mr. Campbell's post. When someone you personally dislike is<br>> > involved, do you all become incapable of making a cogent response to a<br>> > cogent argument? I would like to think that you are capable of better.<br>> ><br>> > -- Chris<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > =======================================================<br>> > List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> > http://www.fsr.net<br>> > mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> > =======================================================<br>> ><br>> <br>> =======================================================<br>> List services made available by First Step Internet, <br>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <br>> http://www.fsr.net <br>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> =======================================================<br><br /><hr />Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble challenge with star power. <a href='http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_oct' target='_new'>Play Now!</a></body>
</html>