<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<STYLE type=text/css>DIV {
MARGIN: 0px
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16544" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Since it's clear it's an argument you desire, try
this on for size. I have no problem at all with some homosexual crimes being
punishable with death or exile (prison). Knowingly transmitting HIV/AIDS to an
unwitting partner comes to mind along with pretty much everything NAMBLA stands
for. I do not believe that it should be a crime to simply be homosexual and I
doubt that Mr. Witmer believes this either. Furthermore, private consensual
relations between two parties of majority would not meet the criterion Mr.
Witmer set out in the post you provide reference to.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I find it hard to believe that because I am not in
favor of state recognition of homosexual marriage you can make the leap to my
potentially being in favor of the mass extermination of all people of this
persuasion. Is this a case of faulty logic or a desire to stir the pot? If
the former, allow me to be clear. In my opinion no one should be executed or
exiled for simply being a homosexual. If it's the later, let the games begin but
please direct your comments to Mr. Witmer and feel free to leave me
out.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>g</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=sdredge@yahoo.com href="mailto:sdredge@yahoo.com">Scott Dredge</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">viz</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, November 10, 2007 10:01
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Vision2020] This is the same CD
Witmer...</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif">
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman,new york,times,serif"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: monospace">> Carl writes: 'This is the same C.D. Witmer
who has stated that, in the<BR>> perfect world envisioned by Mr. Witmer,
citizens would be required to<BR>> take a "trinitarian test oath."
What a, uh, interesting fellow.<BR>> Carl Westberg Jr.'<BR><BR>Yes Carl,
he's the same one who salivates over the return of the days when<BR>gays will
once again be executed. Let's see Gary Crabtree try and defend<BR>this
one. Witmer's verbatim quote is "</SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: monospace">I most definitely look forward to the day when
society changes its laws to be more in line with the Bible's teaching, so that
homosexual crimes can be once again be legally punishable by death or
exile."<BR></SPAN><BR><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: monospace">Full text
at:<BR><BR><SPAN><A
href="http://right-mind.us/blogs/blog_0/archive/2006/05/16/43701.aspx"
target=_blank>http://right-mind.us/blogs/blog_0/archive/2006/05/16/43701.aspx</A></SPAN><BR><BR><BR><BR>From:
kjajmix1 at msn.com<BR>To: thansen at<BR> moscow.com; vision2020 at
moscow.com<BR>Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:49:50 -0700<BR>Subject: Re:
[Vision2020] Sat What?<BR><BR>If I had the energy, I'd spend my evening
playing the "is he more racist, or more homophobic?" game. However, I'm
a bit fatigued, so I'll just go with "he's a thoroughly disgraceful man" and
call it a night.<BR><BR>keely<BR><BR><BR>> From: thansen at
moscow.com<BR>> To: vision2020 at moscow.com<BR>> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007
16:22:00 -0700<BR>> Subject: [Vision2020] Sat What?<BR>> <BR>> "New
Orleans is also overwhelmingly black, and blacks as a group have been<BR>>
destroyed by multiple generations of dependency on government welfare,
which<BR>> is already a form of theft at gunpoint. From such a position it
is but a<BR>> small additional step to looting."<BR>> <BR>> - C. D.
Witmer (November 2, 2007)</SPAN><BR></DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>=======================================================<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>