<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16544" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>And what makes you think that the distinction
escapes me? I was merely calling into question the need to condemn a man (or his
sign?) for making his opinion known. I was also a little unclear as to why it
might be mandatory for a candidate to fall in line and express
his opinion on another mans opinion, as I expressed in my opinion of Ms. Hovey's
opinion of Mr. Carscallen's opinion of Mr. Glasebrook's opinion. See what this
leads to? Chaos!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>g</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>----- Original Message ----- </FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>From: "Sunil Ramalingam" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:sunilramalingam@hotmail.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>sunilramalingam@hotmail.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>To: <</FONT><A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>vision2020@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial size=2>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 10:32
PM</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] The BLog and More
Political Contributions</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><BR><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT></DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2>> Gary,<BR>> <BR>> While I've never seen you attack anyone's
right to expression, you've spent <BR>> plenty of time criticizing the
content of those with whom you disagree. <BR>> Good for you.<BR>>
<BR>> It's no different with Glasebrook's sign. I would never try to
stop him <BR>> from creating or displaying his sign, but I certainly think
he's wrong and <BR>> it was ridiculous. That's not the same as trying
to ban him or restrain his <BR>> speech.<BR>> <BR>> I'm surprised that
suddenly the distinction eludes you.<BR>> <BR>> Sunil<BR>> <BR>>
<BR>>>From: "g. crabtree" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>jampot@roadrunner.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>><BR>>>To: "Sue Hovey" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:suehovey@moscow.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>suehovey@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>>, "Donovan Arnold"
<BR>>><</FONT><A href="mailto:donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com"><FONT
face=Arial size=2>donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>>, "Tom Ivie" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:the_ivies3@yahoo.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>the_ivies3@yahoo.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial size=2>>,
<BR>>> "Moscow Vision 2020" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>vision2020@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>>, "Dan Carscallen"
<BR>>><</FONT><A href="mailto:areaman@moscow.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>areaman@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial size=2>>, <</FONT><A
href="mailto:wdkrauss@clearwire.net"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>wdkrauss@clearwire.net</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>>, <</FONT><A
href="mailto:wmsteed@aol.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>wmsteed@aol.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>><BR>>>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] The BLog and More Political
Contributions<BR>>>Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 18:45:08
-0700<BR>>><BR>>>Ms. Hovey,<BR>>><BR>>>Regarding Dan
Carscallen's comment regarding Mr. Glasebrooks sign. Wouldn't <BR>>>an
outright condemnation be little different than taking the man to task
<BR>>>for exercising his right to express his opinion in public? Whether
you <BR>>>agree or not there is no question but what Mr. Glasebrook truly
believes <BR>>>that the candidates in question are bigoted toward his
church. I would <BR>>>think that reasonable people could disagree without
having to demand they <BR>>>condemn him. I don't remember any call
for condemnation for letter writer's <BR>>>who went to the fanatical
extreme of expressing the opinion that Dr. Weitz <BR>>>hates kids.
But I suppose that was a different, more intimate ox being <BR>>>gored in
that instance.<BR>>><BR>>>One thing I do know is that in a medical
emergency I would be incredibly <BR>>>pleased to see Dan's face as he
dropped everything to do his absolute level <BR>>>best to keep me among
the living as, I suspect, would you. If we're willing <BR>>>to trust him
that far how much more of a stretch is it to trust him with a
<BR>>>council seat? I believe that he'll look for the compromise that
would make <BR>>>both of us equally mad as well as evenly pleased and
devote the same <BR>>>competence to deciding matters of city business that
he does to his other <BR>>>vital activities. Please give him your
consideration.<BR>>><BR>>>g<BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
=======================================================<BR>> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR>> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>>
</FONT><A href="http://www.fsr.net"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>http://www.fsr.net</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>
<BR>> </FONT><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>>
=======================================================<BR>></FONT></BODY></HTML>