<DIV>You could very well be right Sue. But I don't think there would be too many interested parties in that piece of property that would not be competitors with Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart might be starting to sell cars, but honestly, what percentage of the car buying market would be deciding between a Wal-Mart car and a Toyota? : )</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Best,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Donovan </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Sue Hovey <suehovey@moscow.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16544" name=GENERATOR> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Wait a minute here......Just because you think this might have been the perfect deal, there's nothing to indicate Walmart was going to negotiate with James or that James would have even wanted all that land. Wal Mart isn't in the habit of selling off its old properties
anyway. They keep them dark and empty for the tax write off until they can sell them at a nice profit. I doubt James Toyota would have been in that market. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Sue H. </FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com href="mailto:donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com">Donovan Arnold</A> </DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=kjajmix1@msn.com href="mailto:kjajmix1@msn.com">keely emerinemix</A> ; <A title=bevbafus@verizon.net href="mailto:bevbafus@verizon.net">Bev Bafus</A> ; <A title=sslund@roadrunner.com href="mailto:sslund@roadrunner.com">Saundra Lund</A> ; <A
title=vision2020@moscow.com href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A> </DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, October 29, 2007 8:55 PM</DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] Dispel the anti-growth myth</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV>Keely,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I believe that the current Wal Mart building and huge parking lot would have served as the perfect location for James Toyota. But because Moscow leadership rejected Wal-Marts attempt to expand their service to the community, it prevents James Toyota, a local business, from also expanding his service while remaining in the community. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Anti-business attitudes have ripple effects on the community. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Best,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Donovan<BR><BR><B><I>keely emerinemix <<A href="mailto:kjajmix1@msn.com">kjajmix1@msn.com</A>></I></B> wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"> <STYLE>.hmmessage P { PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px } BODY.hmmessage { FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma } </STYLE> I disagree that the city has "lost" James Toyota as it plans its westward expansion. <BR><BR>Moscow sits right on the Washington/Moscow border. If James Toyota, located as near the border as it can be while still being in Idaho, wants to grow, it will seek expansion on a highly traveled corridor -- say, a newly widened four-lane highway from Pullman to Moscow. It wouldn't want to locate at Steakhouse Hill north of Moscow; there's not enough traffic from Potlatch to warrant it, and CdA has a Toyota dealership. Maybe south of town on 95 would make sense, except that the Lewiston-Clarkston area has a Toyota dealership -- again, no need for them to travel to Moscow. You couldn't get
enough traffic on the Troy Highway east of Moscow to justify putting it there; it's true that Bovill lacks a Toyota dealership, but they go west to buy -- Pullman residents don't go east, generally, to shop. The only point on the compass that makes sense for James is to go West on the Moscow-Pullman highway.<BR><BR>Unfortunately, Moscow is bumped up right to the state line -- I could barely park my (Toyota) car west of the westernmost building, the Appaloosa Club, and still be in Idaho. Pullman, on the other hand, gets to claim the eight miles from its eastern border to the state line, and that does give them an advantage (an advantage that, while perhaps good for them, deserves oversight and comment from our council). If Moscow began eight miles east of the straight line, and that land were ripe for development, my guess is that James Toyota would stay in Idaho, effectively drawing customers from all over the Toyota dealer-deficient Palouse.<BR><BR>I
can't comment on a lot of the development on that corridor, but I think it's inaccurate to say that Moscow "lost" James Toyota. <BR><BR>keely<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:04:00 -0700<BR>From: donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com<BR>To: bevbafus@verizon.net; sslund@roadrunner.com; vision2020@moscow.com<BR>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Dispel the anti-growth myth<BR><BR> <DIV>I think the image of Moscow being anti-business is an accurate perception. And it isn't new, it has just gotten worse. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I am sure that many businesses have come to Moscow, even in recent years. However, we are also losing a lot of businesses and are blocking many of them from coming into Moscow. We also prevent businesses from expanding and hiring more people. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I have attended few city council meetings, but many of them were about blocking some type of business or another. I remember the city council rejecting
an entire expansion of businesses behind the Palouse Mall. Many local businesses have been pushed out of the Palouse Mall and the city has done nothing to protect them. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>And as we all know, Moscow rejected a Wal-Mart Supercenter, Naylor Farms, and Home Depot. Likewise it lost Toyota, Tidyman's, and several wonderful restaurants, and a locally owned repair shop in additions to a 1/2 downtown and in the Palouse Mall. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I do agree with Alturas as being an example of doing "The Right Thing" to get a business in. But as I recall Aaron Ament was against the expansion of that building, and more tax dollars were put into that building than we have received in return. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I think the biggest anti-business incentives for Moscow are its property taxes. Moscow's taxes make Moscow an unaffordable city that is unfriendly to businesses. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Best,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Donovan</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Bev Bafus <bevbafus@verizon.net></I></B> wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE class=EC_replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid">Let's add a few expanding businesses. Northwest Management, where I work,<BR>is currently doubling the size of our office. Northwest River Supplies took<BR>over the Tidyman's building.<BR><BR>Any other expanding businesses?<BR><BR>Bev<BR><BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: vision2020-bounces@moscow.com<BR>[mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com]On Behalf Of Saundra Lund<BR>Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 5:26 PM<BR>To: vision2020@moscow.com<BR>Subject: [Vision2020] Dispel the anti-growth myth<BR><BR><BR>The letter below appears in today's Daily News -- anyone care to add more to<BR>Ms. Sullivan's list?<BR><BR>Also, do any of you GMAers care to provide a list of new businesses that<BR>came to Moscow during
any two-year period of Comstock's reign and a list of<BR>businesses that were denied?<BR><BR>I think it might be interested to have a ***factual*** comparison rather<BR>than just rumors designed to tear down the community.<BR><BR><BR>Saundra Lund<BR><BR><BR>"Dispel the anti-growth myth<BR><BR>I agree that having the "perception" of being anti-growth/anti-business is<BR>harmful to the city of Moscow, and I was driven to find out why that<BR>perception exists when Wayne Krauss expressed concerns and asked, "Why do we<BR>have this perception?" at a recent forum.<BR><BR>Since the most recently elected council came into office in January 2006,<BR>more than 35 new businesses have opened in Moscow, including Old Navy, Bed,<BR>Bath and Beyond, Cramer's Furniture, Dad's Diner, Marco Polo, Nectar,<BR>Lilliput, Sisters Brew Coffeehouse, West of Paris, Palouse Scoots, Moscow<BR>Bagel and Deli, Anytime Fitness, San Miguels, Sure Shot Sporting Goods,<BR>Subway, and BioTracking just to
name a few. Many businesses have expanded<BR>and moved into larger spaces during this time. Only two businesses were<BR>denied by the city and these were both handled in the way that Walter Steed<BR>states he would address a pig farm wanting to locate behind his property;<BR>they were denied in the specific proposed locations in accordance with<BR>zoning regulations. Never did city officials say they were not wanted in<BR>Moscow.<BR><BR>Back to the question posed by Krauss: "Why do we have this perception?" For<BR>the answer, I would look to recent advertisements in the Moscow-Pullman<BR>Daily News for Krauss, Steed and Carscallen in which the headline calls the<BR>current city leadership "anti-growth politicians." I would pay attention to<BR>who is repeating this anti-growth message over and over.<BR><BR>I believe Dan Carscallen is concerned when he says, "Changing the perception<BR>is the thing that needs to happen," and if we can all agree that this is<BR>harmful, we
should all agree to stop, to dispel this myth and to promote<BR>Moscow.<BR><BR>Brandy Sullivan, Moscow"<BR><BR>=======================================================<BR>List services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<BR>http://www.fsr.net<BR>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================<BR><BR>=======================================================<BR>List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR>http://www.fsr.net <BR>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>__________________________________________________<BR>Do You Yahoo!?<BR>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <BR>http://mail.yahoo.com <BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <HR> Peek-a-boo FREE Tricks & Treats for You! <A
href="http://www.reallivemoms.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us" target=_new>Get 'em!</A> =======================================================<BR>List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR>http://www.fsr.net <BR>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================</BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <DIV>__________________________________________________<BR>Do You Yahoo!?<BR>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <BR>http://mail.yahoo.com <DIV> <HR> <DIV></DIV>=======================================================<BR> List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR>
http://www.fsr.net <BR> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================</DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><p> __________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com