<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16544" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Darrell, good to hear from you again. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I don't think I disagree with you on any point in this post. And I
don't see any point you make as inconsistent with my personal feelings about the
best future direction of the city. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I recognize the existence here of a healthy retail economy and a vibrant
downtown, and I acknowledge that they contribute to our quality of life.
Are you suggesting that either our local retail or business climate is not
healthy? If so, what is unhealthy and how would you propose to make things
healthier? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Bruce</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=keim153@gmail.com href="mailto:keim153@gmail.com">Darrell Keim</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=thansen@moscow.com
href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">Tom Hansen</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=idahotom@hotmail.com
href="mailto:idahotom@hotmail.com">Tom Hansen</A> ; <A
title=vision2020@moscow.com href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">v2020</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, October 25, 2007 2:22
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] real economic
development in Moscow</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Bill et al:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I was at the MCA's recent economic forum. I found it to be very
interesting in both what was addressed, and what wasn't. I felt the
panelists did a fair job of describing what aspects of Moscow drew them
to locate here. Nice parks, short/no commute, culture, universities,
etc. If pushed, I think the panelists would summarize what brought them
as quality of life. Also mentioned as reasons for coming to Moscow were
Alturas and the Small Business Incubator. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I liked what BJ Swanson had to say about the importance of bringing in
higher paying jobs (The example in her case being tech. jobs. Other
types of high paying jobs create the same phenomenon). Essentially, she
advocated for working to bring in higher paying jobs, and that retail
businesses would follow. I think I can accurately quote her as saying
"You can't build an economy on retail jobs alone." </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Or, as Stu Scott said at another recent economic forum (paraphrasing
again), some businesses re-circulate and slightly magnify the dollar. To truly
grow the economy you've got to manufacture something. (The same forum
mentioned something like $1.15 going into the economy for every $1 spent at a
local chain store. And, $1.25 going into the local economy for every
dollar spent at a locally owned merchant. I digress...) </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I can agree with almost all of the above discussed at the forum. I
would add that Moscow has traditionally "manufactured" education and
agriculture. The UI and agriculture have been our biggest
"factories." And, just as BJ's model predicts, those high paying
education and ag. "factories" brought in what we currently have for a
business climate. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Now for the part that I found interesting because of its absence:
</DIV>
<DIV>How is quality of life defined? </DIV>
<DIV>How does our local business climate fit into the quality of life
picture?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><EM>The above, it seems to me, is the crux of our current civic
debate.</EM></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>So, how is quality of life defined? </DIV>
<DIV>Ask a hundred people and get a hundred different answers.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The panelists listed as quality of life indicators such things as: parks,
walkability, little traffic. Quality of life must have something else to
it, too. If quality of life is ONLY the items listed by the forum, then
I humbly suggest that Garfield and Oakesdale also fit the bill quite nicely to
become hotbeds of technological development. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Hopefully you understand the above was sarcasm.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I believe there is another, as yet unmentioned, aspect of quality of
life. I submit that what makes Moscow's quality of life so good is the
great combination we have of parks, traffic, etc; with our engaged citizenry,
and good local economy. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>How does our local business climate fit into the quality of life
picture?</DIV>
<DIV>In a lot of ways, our existing businesses are what make our
quality of life possible: </DIV>
<DIV>Businesses provide the jobs that allow people to live here.</DIV>
<DIV>Businesses pay taxes helping to make our parks and infrastructure
possible. (Incidentally, the businesses also make it possible for the people
that live here to pay taxes.)</DIV>
<DIV>Businesses make it possible for us to get our "necessities"
locally.</DIV>
<DIV>I'm sure others can come up with more to add to the list.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Smart businesses looking to locate here realize they won't be operating
in a vacuum. They look at ALL of our local business and social
environment before deciding to grow here. They look from a business
perspective at our city government, infrastructure, parks, ecology,
businesses already present, etc. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Smart businesses also look at a bigger picture beyond "bottom line"
items. They look from a social perspective to see if their employees
will be happy living in the community, again looking at our city government,
infrastructure, parks, ecology, businesses already present, etc. Both
perspectives must be promising for it to be a strong match. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Moscow would be unattractive to high wage paying employers if we did
not already have a strong mix of local businesses and retail
stores. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>To put it simply, prospective businesses are looking to grow
their new "factories" on the shoulders of what is already here. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I strongly believe in working to bring in high paying jobs. To do
so we must be aware of what about our existing structure is going to be an
attractor, and we must work to keep it healthy. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Later,</DIV>
<DIV>Darrell</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT color=#550055>> R-<BR>> You missed the point.<BR>>
These high-tech jobs can go anywhere. All towns want them.<BR>> The
entrepreneurs can be choosy, and they are choosy. They want towns with
<BR>> a high quality of life.<BR>> If Moscow sacrifices its high quality
of life for (what you describe as)<BR>> "almost anything that will provide
jobs, increase the tax base and improve<BR>> the overall economy", then we
lose what now attracts these high-tech jobs. <BR>> You just can not have it
both ways.<BR>> I want to live in a town that maintains its high quality of
life and<BR>> therefore is attractive to high-tech jobs -- not a town
that has no<BR>> standards but goes for any growth. <BR>>
BL</FONT></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>=======================================================<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>