I don't know about the melting part, but Chris can tell you that North Pole is in Alaska -no Visa required, but I bet they take American Express!!<BR><BR><B><I>Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com></I></B> wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"> <DIV>I'm wondering, where is Santa Clause going to live since the North Pole is melting?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I also am wondering if people are going to shut down the giant toy shop up there because it is emitting environmental pollutants in a protected area. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Also, doesn't Santa now need a Visa to enter the country through Canada? Immigration might nab him. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Best,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Donovan<BR><BR><B><I>Tom Ivie <the_ivies3@yahoo.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<DIV>You say, "This coming election will say a lot about our community and about the future we chart for ourselves. It is time for the hand-wringers to move to the sidelines."</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Just for argument sake, what would you say if all of the MCA/non-GMA candidates win?"</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>As for Santa Clause...He's The Man!! But I don't want his workshop next to my bedroom. Maybe in a light industrial area? He will need to keep the animals in an appropriate area also, as they are a little large for my neighborhood. Before he comes, though, we need some very affordable housing...because, well, I don't think he probably pays very well when he gives the toys away for free. Come to think of it, having him here would bring new meaning to free market. I once heard rumors that Santa did live in Moscow. Then I visited this key shop with my son to get a key for his bike lock. HOLY
COW!! And he almost gave that key away!! It was magical how he went straight to the correct key blank among hundreds, maybe thousands! Those rosey cheeks, white beard, all that was missing was the red suit and a HO HO HO.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Disclaimer: Don't take this Santa Clause bit too serious, it was done in fun -not malice. <BR><BR><B><I>Jeff Harkins <jeffh@moscow.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Gary, good to see your clear and concise comments making a difference. Here are some of my observations.<BR><BR>Ideologues are all around us in this region. They have no solution to resolve the water issue (or much of any other issue) but they follow the same tactic used since the creation of the MCA; fear, intimidation, heckling and smearing are their tools. If you support an organization like GMA, you are publicly
chided for supporting candidates endorsed by them. In other words, you don't know as much as the MCA people and therefore your voices and your opinions don't matter.<BR><BR>Frankly, all the candidates for city council seem to be honest, sincere and interested in doing what they perceive to be the best things for the community. But when the actions of supporters and/or candidates sense a challenge to their "vision for Moscow", rather than debate the issue, they turn on the candidate and chide them for their opinions. Wayne Krauss, Walter Steed and Dan Carscallen are all honorable men. They have spent most of their adult lives in this community. They have a right to be respected - for their views, for their willingness to step up to the challenge of city council and for their willingness to engage in honorable debate with candidates that they don't agree with.<BR><BR>In a similar vein, Linda Pall, Aaron Ament, Tom Lamar and Evin Holmes are
honorable folks. Most have spent a good portion of their adult lives in Moscow and they should be respected for their willingness to serve our community.<BR><BR>To indict any of them for their opinions and views on a topic simply validates that our citizens should not vote for the candidate the indictors are supporting but should vote for the candidate being scalloped. Issues and answers and policies such as the water question are founded first in science. Let the science do the talking - report studies, provide links to the scientific evidence, establish the proposition of your hypothesis and then talk about strategies for solutions. It is "very difficult" to resolve a problem with rhetoric and finger pointing (Joe and Bruce, you are encouraged to think about this very carefully). <BR><BR>This coming election will say a lot about our community and about the future we chart for ourselves. It is time for the hand-wringers to move to the
sidelines. We need decisive, thoughtful and forthright leadership to guide us through the challenges that lay ahead. Will we have a community that can support our children and the children of our children? Will we be able to welcome new residents with a bundle of opportunities that entices them to stay or will we winnow them out - because they don't fit into our lifestyle? Will we have the type of community that encourages entrepreneurs to come here and risk their investment capital here or will we worry ourselves to death over whether or not this business or that business is "acceptable"? What I have learned from listening to the forums this past couple of years is that even if Santa Claus wanted to move his operation here, there would be at least a handful of people who would object to that move. <BR><BR>For my taste, it <B>is </B>time for a change in Moscow. <BR><BR>At 07:02 PM 10/18/2007, you wrote:<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE
class=cite cite="" type="cite"><FONT size=2>Conservation can never be a bad idea but using the water issue as a club to force other ideological visions on the community where they don't apply (big box ordinances for one example) is disingenuous. I don't believe that the GMA endorsed candidates are suggesting that we make a desperate attempt to suck the aquifer dry before their terms expire. To suggest otherwise is simply partisan politics at its worst.<BR></FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>g<BR>----- Original Message ----- </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>From: "Tom Hansen" <<A href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">thansen@moscow.com</A>><BR>To: "'g. crabtree'" <<A href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">jampot@roadrunner.com</A>>; "'Joe Campbell'" <<A href="mailto:joekc@adelphia.net">joekc@adelphia.net</A>>; <<A href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A>>; "'Mark Solomon'" <<A href="mailto:msolomon@moscow.com">msolomon@moscow.com</A>><BR>Sent:
Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:29 PM<BR>Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Water Concern?<BR></FONT><BR><FONT size=2>>g -<BR>> <BR>> You suggested that perhaps none of the city council candidates have a firm<BR>> handle on the water situation.<BR>> <BR>> If this is true, wouldn't it be better advised to err on the side of<BR>> caution? <BR>> <BR>> Both Lamar and Ament cited PBAC as authorities on the figures they presented<BR>> yesterday at the CofC Forum. Krauss cited "something [he] read somewhere"<BR>> and Steed simply wants to remove limitations and controls.<BR>> <BR>> Your thoughts?<BR>> <BR>> Seeya round town, Moscow.<BR>> <BR>> Tom Hansen<BR>> Moscow, Idaho<BR>> <BR>> "We're a town of about 23,000 with 10,000 college students. The college<BR>> students are not very active in local elections (thank goodness!)."<BR>> <BR>> - Dale Courtney (March 28, 2007)<BR>> <BR>> -----Original
Message-----<BR>> <BR>> From: <A href="mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com">vision2020-bounces@moscow.com</A> [<A href="mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com" eudora="autourl"> mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com</A>]<BR>> On Behalf Of g. crabtree<BR>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:33 PM<BR>> To: Joe Campbell; <A href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A>; Mark Solomon<BR>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Water Concern?<BR>> <BR>> I assume the statement that includes "...regarding<BR>> the upper aquifer which if continued to be pumped at current levels could be<BR>> <BR>> in crisis as soon as 15-20 years from now." is couched that way to leave <BR>> room for the obvious corollary?<BR>> <BR>> Could be 50-75 years, could be 115-120 years? Could be we really don't know <BR>> for sure? Could be that Krauss, Carscallen, and Steed have as firm a handle <BR>> on the water situation as any of the MCA candidates
do.<BR>> <BR>> g<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>></FONT> <BR>=======================================================<BR> List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR> <A href="http://www.fsr.net /" eudora="autourl">http://www.fsr.net </A><BR> <A href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" eudora="autourl">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>=======================================================</BLOCKQUOTE>=======================================================<BR>List services made available by
First Step Internet, <BR>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR>http://www.fsr.net <BR>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================</BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><BR>Tom & Liz Ivie <DIV>__________________________________________________<BR>Do You Yahoo!?<BR>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <BR>http://mail.yahoo.com =======================================================<BR>List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR>http://www.fsr.net <BR>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <div>__________________________________________________<BR>Do You Yahoo!?<BR>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <BR>http://mail.yahoo.com </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><BR>Tom & Liz Ivie<p> __________________________________________________<br>Do
You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com