<div>Ted Moffett questioned:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>If the police officer was sitting in the stall clothed, what invasion of privacy occurred if someone gazed at him through the crack in the door?"</div>
<div>-------</div>
<div>Tom took this question out of context, and applied it to a context and situation for which the question was not meant to apply, privacy rights in a private home, when he questioned:</div>
<div><font face="Arial" color="navy" size="2"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></span></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" color="navy" size="2"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Are you suggesting, Mr. Moffett, that it is acceptable to "gaze" from outdoors into somebody's bathroom as long as either nobody is there or if somebody is there, they are fully clothed.
</span></font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" color="navy" size="2"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></span></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" color="navy" size="2"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">-------</span></font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" color="navy" size="2"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></span></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" color="navy" size="2"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Let's explore my question, and Tom's statement below, in the context my question was supposed to apply, a police sex sting operation in a public restroom:
</span></font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" color="navy" size="2"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></span></font> </div>
<div>Tom Hansen wrote:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>"<font face="Arial" color="navy" size="2"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">In my opinion a person situated in a public restroom stall is entitled to the same degree of privacy against on-lookers as if (s)he were in a bathroom at home."
</span></font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" color="navy" size="2"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">-------------------------</span></font><br> </div>
<div>In a bathroom in a private home, laws regarding privacy protect the privacy rights (including protections from outside view) of someone who invites someone else into their bathroom for sex. This level of legal protection for privacy does not apply to a public restroom, thus a public bathroom stall is not accorded the same degree of protection on privacy rights as a private home bathroom; and in the case under discussion, a sex sting operation conducted by police in a public restroom, it is misleading to imply this context applies to a private residence. Police sex sting operations are not conducted inside private bathrooms in private residences.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>If the police officer gave signals that could publicly be viewed in this public bathroom, that his presence in the stall was to seek an "encounter," and remaining fully clothed in the stall was part of this game of signals, Craig's alleged gazing at a fully clothed person in the stall in this context, a context that might be interpreted as police "entrapment," is not the same situation as someone gazing at a half naked person in a bathroom stall, a situation for which the privacy of a bathroom stall is intended, and should be respected, of course. Public bathroom stalls should offer full privacy from outside view, even to a innocent glance, when the door is closed. But they often do not.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Everyone understands the difference between being viewed naked or fully clothed as to the degree of having their privacy violated. As everyone with a full respect for civil rights understands that private homes are just that... private.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Ted Moffett</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>