<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [Vision2020] NOAA Confirms Dramatic Sea Ice
Loss</title></head><body>
<div>Speaking of birds blown by storms: after Katrina disrupted the
Mississippi Flyway, literally hundreds of prairie falcons which are
extremely rare in these parts, were hanging around Moscow Mountain for
a week or so trying (I'm guessing) to figure out just where they
were.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>"Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore."</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>m.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>At 3:16 PM -0700 9/10/07, Kai Eiselein, editor wrote:</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font size="-1">I know, and Yuma
would be much better looking with a beachfront. I grew up in and
around Nogales, which is about 140 miles inland from the Sea of
Cortez. Yuma is about 40 miles inland, if I recall
correctly.</font></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font size="-1">On a side note, it was a
strange juxtapostion to see pelicans hanging around stock tanks in the
Sonoran Desert after they'd been blown inland from
storms.</font></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font size="-1">Remember to stop by
"Kaktus Kai's Surf and Snak Shoppe" on the Yuma
waterfront. Home of the best fish tacos this side of
Atlantis.</font><br>
<blockquote>----- Original Message -----</blockquote>
<blockquote><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:msolomon@moscow.com">Mark
Solomon</a></blockquote>
<blockquote><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:starbliss@gmail.com">Ted
Moffett</a></blockquote>
<blockquote><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:lfalen@turbonet.com">lfalen</a>
; <a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">MoscowVision 2020</a> ; <a
href="mailto:editor@lataheagle.com">Kai Eiselein,
editor</a></blockquote>
<blockquote><b>Sent:</b> Monday, September 10, 2007 2:54
PM</blockquote>
<blockquote><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Vision2020] NOAA Confirms Dramatic
Sea Ice Loss</blockquote>
<blockquote><br></blockquote>
<blockquote>Watch out, Kai: Yuma is at elevation 138' above sea
level.</blockquote>
<blockquote><br></blockquote>
<blockquote>m.</blockquote>
<blockquote><br></blockquote>
<blockquote>At 2:48 PM -0700 9/10/07, Ted Moffett wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite> <br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>All-<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote> <br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>The NOAA study I referenced focused on Arctic sea ice
loss, which, while a great environmental and ecosystem disaster,
associated with problems caused by global warming that are
planetary wide, will not cause sea levels to rise. Most of the
Arctic ice is floating on the ocean, so it is displacing its weight in
liquid water. The main sources of ice melt that will cause sea
levels to rise dramatically are Greenland and Antarctica, where the
ice is on land above water. The potential is for sea level rise
of over 150 feet. There are verified measurements that both
Greenland and Antarctic ice is threatening ocean level rise. A
skeptic might argue that snow fall will replace the ice as fast as it
melts, even assuming global warming is occurring. The increased
atmospheric moisture caused by global warming will cause an increase
in snow fall over Greenland or Antarctica. But with profound
global warming of, let's say, 5 C. average global temperatures, it is
very doubtful the melting could be offset by increasing snow fall.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote> <br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>The Arctic ice is melting extremely fast due to the
effects of albedo (a term for the reflectivity of a body of surface).
Ice or snow reflects a large amount of solar radiation. When it
melts and exposes the ocean, as in Arctic ice, the darker water
absorbs more energy and stores it, increasing the rate of the melting
of ice. A snow ball effect, no pun intended. When or if
land areas on Greenland or Antarctica become more exposed as ice
melts, this will also increase albedo, accelerating the melting,
though perhaps not as fast as in the case of
the Arctic ice over water. Antarctica has already has
massive ice sheets break apart on the edges of this continent, sheets
that have been stable for thousands of years, increasing the rate of
movement of glaciers that dump into the ocean, exposing warmer water
to the edges of Antarctica, increasing melt rate in this area.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote> <br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>Some scientists think snow fall replacement in the
interior of Antarctica is increasing, helping to offset melting of
glaciers on the edges.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote> <br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>Ted Moffett <br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>On 9/10/07,<b> Mark Solomon</b> <<a
href="mailto:msolomon@moscow.com">msolomon@moscow.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote>Hard to look on the bright side when rising sea levels
caused by<br>
melting ice threaten millions of people in low lying areas of
Asia,<br>
Europe, the US and the rest of the world.<br>
<br>
m.<br>
<br>
At 10:52 AM -0700 9/10/07, lfalen wrote:<br>
>Ted<br>
>Look on the bright side. A complete opening of the
Northwest</blockquote>
<blockquote>>Passage would cut 2500 miles off of the journey from
Europe to Asia.<br>
>Roger<br>
>-----Original message-----<br>
>From: "Ted Moffett" <a
href="mailto:starbliss@gmail.com">starbliss@gmail.com</a><br>
>Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:03:41 -0700<br>
>To: "MoscowVision 2020" <a
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
>Subject: [Vision2020] NOAA Confirms Dramatic Sea Ice Loss<br>
><br>
>> *NOAA researchers confirm predictions of dramatic
sea ice loss *<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><a
href=
"http://www.technewsworld.com/story/A0OHya0BOvEw9B/Study-Confirms-Shrinking-Levels-of-Arctic-Sea-Ice.xhtml"><span
></span
>http://www.technewsworld.com/story/A0OHya0BOvEw9B/Study-Confirms-Shr<span
></span>inking-Levels-of-Arctic-Sea-Ice.xhtml</a><br>
>><br>
>> By DAN JOLING<br>
>> Associated Press Writer<br>
>><br>
>> ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) -- Computer predictions of
a dramatic decline of sea<br>
>> ice in regions of the Arctic are confirmed by
actual observations, according<br>
>> to scientists for the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.<br>
>><br>
>> The Seattle-based researchers reviewed 20 computer
scenarios of the affects<br>
>> of warming on sea ice used by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change<br>
>> in its assessment report released this year.<br>
>><br>
>> The researchers compared those models with sea ice
observations from 1979<br>
>> through 1999, rejecting about half because they
did not match what<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>>> satellites showed, said oceanographer
James Overland.<br>
>><br>
>> But using the most reliable models, the NOAA
scientists reached the same<br>
>> unhappy conclusion: by 2050, summer sea ice in the
Beaufort Sea off Alaska's<br>
>> north coast likely will have diminished by 40
percent compared to the 1980s.<br>
>> The same is likely for the East Siberian-Chukchi
Sea region off northwest<br>
>> Alaska and Russia. In contrast, Canada's Baffin
Bay and Labrador showed<br>
>> little predicted change.<br>
>><br>
>> There was less confidence for winter ice, but the
models also predict a sea<br>
>> ice loss of more than 40 percent for the Bering
Sea off Alaska's west coast,<br>
>> the Sea of Okhotsk east of Siberia and the Barents
Sea north of Norway.<br>
>><br>
>> A 40 percent loss of summer sea ice off Alaska in
the Beaufort Sea could<br>
>> have profound effects on marine mammals dependent
on the sea ice such as<br>
>> polar bears, now under consideration by the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service<br>
>> for "threatened" status under the
Endangered Species Act because of changes<br>
>> in the animals' habitat from global warming.<br>
>><br>
>> Overland, an oceanographer at NOAA's Pacific
Marine Environmental Laboratory<br>
>> in Seattle, and Muyin Wang, a meteorologist at
NOAA's Joint Institute for<br>
>> the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean at the
University of Washington in<br>
>> Seattle, reviewed 20 computer models provided
through the IPCC. Their<br>
>> research paper will be published Saturday in
Geophysical Research Letters, a<br>
>> publication of the American Geophysical Union.<br>
>><br>
>> In the 1980s, sea ice receded 30 to 50 miles each
summer off the north coast<br>
>> of Alaska, Overland said.<br>
>><br>
>> "Now we're talking about 300 to 500 miles
north of Alaska," he said of<br>
>> projections for 2050.<br>
>><br>
>> That's far past the edge of the highly productive
waters over the relatively<br>
>> shallow continental shelf off Alaska's north
coast, considered important<br>
>> habitat for polar bears and their main prey,
ringed seals, plus other<br>
>> ice-dependent mammals such as walrus.<br>
>><br>
>> Kassie Siegel of the Center for Biological
Diversity, who wrote the petition<br>
>> seeking federal protection for polar bears, said
NOAA's retrospective of sea<br>
>> ice projections does not even take into account
sea ice figures for this<br>
>> summer recorded by the National Snow and Ice Data
Center. As of Tuesday, the<br>
>> center's measurement of sea ice stood at 1.70
million square miles, far<br>
>> below the previous record low for summer ice of
2.05 million square miles<br>
>> recorded Sept. 20, 2005.<br>
>><br>
>> The situation is dire for polar bears, Siegel
said.<br>
> ><br>
>> "They're going to drown, they're going to
starve, they're going to resort to<br>
>> cannibalism, they're going to become extinct,"
she said.<br>
>><br>
>> As ice recedes, many bears will get stuck on land
in summer, where they have</blockquote>
<blockquote>>> virtually no sustainable food source,
Siegel said. Some will try and fail to<br>
>> swim to sea ice, she said. Bears that stay on sea
ice will find water beyond<br>
>> the continental shelf to be less productive.
Females trying to den on land<br>
>> in the fall will face a long swim.<br>
>><br>
>> "It's absolutely horrifying from the polar
bear perspective," she said.<br>
>><br>
>> Less sea ice also will mean a changing ecosystem
for commercial fishermen<br>
>> and marine mammals in the Bering Sea, Overland
said.<br>
>><br>
>> With sea ice present, much of the nutrients
produced in the ocean feed<br>
>> simple plankton that bloom and sink to the ocean
floor, providing rich<br>
>> habitat for crabs, clams and the mammals that feed
off them, including gray<br>
>> whales and walrus.<br>
>><br>
>> "If you don't have the ice around, the
productivity stays up closer to the<br>
>> surface of the ocean," Overland said.
"You actually have a change in the<br>
>> whole ecosystem from one that depends on the
animals that live on the bottom<br>
>> to one that depends on the animals that live in
the water column. So you<br>
>> have winners and losers."<br>
>><br>
>> That could mean short-term gains for salmon and
pollock, he said. But it<br>
>> also could mean that fishermen will have to travel
farther north to fish in<br>
>> Alaska's productive waters, and warm-water
predators might move north.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>>><br>
>> Overland said sea ice computer models have
performed well accounting for how<br>
>> ice melts from global warming and for the albedo
effect - accelerated<br>
>> warming due to the presence of dark water that
absorbs most of the sun's<br>
>> radiation, warming the ocean and making it harder
for water to freeze, in<br>
>> contrast to ice, which reflects most of the sun's
radiation.<br>
>><br>
>> The models do not do as well accounting for wind
and cloud patterns and<br>
>> other factors that may have contributed to recent
warming, Overland said.<br>
>><br>
>> But the contribution to warming by greenhouse gas
emissions likely are set,<br>
>> he said. Emissions stay in the atmosphere for 40
to 50 years before being<br>
>> absorbed by the ocean. The amount put out in the
last 20 years and the<br>
>> carbon dioxide put out in the next 20 will be
around to influence the<br>
>> half-century mark, Overland said.<br>
>><br>
>> "I'm afraid to say, a lot of the images we
are going to see in the next 30<br>
>> to 40 years are pretty much already established,"
he said.<br>
>><br>
>> ------<br>
>><br>
>> Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett<br>
>><br>
>></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
</body>
</html>