Ah yes . . well in all fairness it should have read "Similar to
your big day of PLANNING ON distributing fliers with Mr Sitler's photo
on them . . ." But you knew full well what I meant:<br>
<br>Tom Hansen Thursday May 10: "Next Monday the public can distribute flyers (complete with photo and
details) announcing that a Level 3 sex offender was relesed into their
neighborhood last Friday. For starters the public can post these flyers
(which will be downloadable from a local popular website) at Rosauers,
at Safeway, at Winco, at Wal-Mart, in local taverns, and at Friendship
Square."<br>
<br>
Hey - there's that "Friendship" Square again! Let's all go to
"Friendship" Square where we can pummel the rights of whomever we wish,
whenever we wish, however we wish! If Mayor C has her way, does
that mean I can't take my gun with me to "Friendship" Square?!?!<br>
<br>Tom Hansen Friday May 11: "What promulgates my publication of
these flyers, Mr. Schwaller, is Mr. Sitler's absence from the Idaho Sex
Offender Registry. . . Now, if you will excuse me, I have some
flyers to design for Monday."<br>
<br>
Oh . . . you mean THOSE fliers. Yeah Tom, those
fliers. Oh, and for future reference and postings, Idaho has no
ranking such as "Level 3" sex offenders. <br>
<br>
As you will (probably not) recall, I attempted to give you a friendly
bit of advice about harassment, which you promptly dismissed as a
trivial point. Yet now you decide to pull an complete 180 with
"If what you are claiming in Part #1 were true, it would be a textbook
example of harassment. As such, you should file a complaint IMMEDIATELY
with the local authorities." Can you spell "schizoid"?<br>
<br>
Well maybe PLANNING on doing such as thing (as you were) would not
constitute harassment, whereas actually DOING it (which, thanks to the
ISP update you did not) would constitute said harassment. Go
ahead and tell yourself "Yeah, that sounds good! It was
only a thought in my mind - no harm, no foul."<br>
<br>
It isn't community service when you zero in on one tiny target.
Perhaps if you concentrated on all "Sexual Predators on the Palouse" or
all "City Code Violators on the Palouse" or all "Criminals Getting Off
Easy on the Palouse" I might think that to be Service. As it is
you have chosen one small cross-section of the population on whom to
focus, and THAT is hatred, bigotry, and intolerance. <br>
<br>
Yes I'm sure you get emails telling you what a wonder you are.
And we can probably list on one hand the authors of those praises -
hiding their hatred and bigotry behind their practice of "religion" and
"philosophy" and "politics" and "family values". Interesting that
"ethics" doesn't seem to ever figure into it. Well enjoy those
voices who laud your accomplishments. I hope it serves as a salve
for the burning itch of your own inadequacies.<br>
<br>
And Tom, leave the humor to the comics, the
"professionals". After all they don't intrude on your
territory. Well, at least not after Michael Richards did.<br>
<br>
Schwaller<br>
<br>
<br>