<html>
<head>
<style>
P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
"Your Eye Shall Not Pity" <BR>
By Gregory Dickison<BR>
(Credenda series titled "Magistralis") which is accessible from:<BR>
<BR>
"Not On The Palouse, Not Ever" (with PDF file)<BR><A href="http://tinyurl.com/2wavk7">http://tinyurl.com/2wavk7</A><BR>
<BR>
or directly from the horse's . . . er . . . uh . . . mouth<BR><A href="http://www.credenda.org/old/issues/vol3/magi3-9.htm">http://www.credenda.org/old/issues/vol3/magi3-9.htm</A><BR>
<BR>
Tom Hansen<BR>
Moscow, Idaho<BR>
<BR><BR>> From: jampot@roadrunner.com<BR>> To: ophite@gmail.com<BR>> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:38:01 -0700<BR>> CC: vision2020@moscow.com; joekc@adelphia.net<BR>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Trinity Festival protest<BR>> <BR>> Mr. Schou asks as though there were sinister implications to the answer:<BR>> <BR>> Gary, who's been feeding you these links?<BR>> <BR>> Why would any "feeding" be required? C/A is available online free of charge.<BR>> <BR>> Wilson's blog is there for all to see. It has an excellent search function.<BR>> <BR>> Cannon Press has a complete listing of available materials for your pleasure <BR>> on their website.<BR>> <BR>> I hope that this answers your burning question. It was the work of but a few <BR>> moments to obtain the references I listed in my post. My question for you <BR>> would be why would it matter? The simple fact that they exist seems to <BR>> effectively rebut the assertion that CC is " terribly reticent to discuss <BR>> its views on the death penalty for homosexuals."<BR>> <BR>> g<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> -- Original Message ----- <BR>> From: "Andreas Schou" <ophite@gmail.com><BR>> To: "g. crabtree" <jampot@roadrunner.com><BR>> Cc: "keely emerinemix" <kjajmix1@msn.com>; "lfalen" <lfalen@turbonet.com>; <BR>> "Joe Campbell" <joekc@adelphia.net>; <vision2020@moscow.com><BR>> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 9:16 AM<BR>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Trinity Festival protest<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >> Before swallowing Mix, Campbell, Schou, and others of their ilk's <BR>> >> breathless<BR>> >> assertions one would be well advised to go to the source and review what <BR>> >> has<BR>> >> actually been said. Since Ms. Mix mentions Credenda/Agenda one might do <BR>> >> well<BR>> >> to start there. Please see Volume 16 number 2. The entire issue is <BR>> >> devoted<BR>> >> to the topic and nowhere will you see any evidence of the claims made by<BR>> >> CC's usual antagonists. After dealing with that disappointment one might <BR>> >> go<BR>> >> to Doug Wilson's own personnel blog and read entries on 06/01/05 and<BR>> >> 08/30/05, the latter specifically and in detail speaking to the <BR>> >> ridiculous<BR>> >> notion expressed by our resident propagandists. And finally for the <BR>> >> reading<BR>> >> challenged, one can listen to Wilson in his very own voice speak to the<BR>> >> topic on the Cannon Press CD "The Sin of Homophobia" lecture C 03/31/04.<BR>> ><BR>> > Yes, Gary. Why don't we review what's been said:<BR>> ><BR>> > Slavery is a sin. Slavery is not a sin.<BR>> ><BR>> > The Civil War unjustly crushed the South. The Civil War was the<BR>> > judgment of an angry God on a corrupt society.<BR>> ><BR>> > Homosexuality should be punished with death. Homosexuality should not<BR>> > be punished with death. Homosexuality should be punished with exile.<BR>> > Gay marriage is wrong. Gay marriage is the judgment of an angry God on<BR>> > the United States.<BR>> ><BR>> > The United States should be ruled according to Mosaic law now. The<BR>> > United States should not be ruled according to Mosaic law yet. The<BR>> > United States should only be ruled according to Mosaic law when<BR>> > Americans are ready to be ruled according to Mosaic law.<BR>> ><BR>> > Lying is wrong. "Covenental lying," i.e. "lying to those outside the<BR>> > church," is an exception.<BR>> ><BR>> > We consider Moscow a "tactical point." We do not consider Moscow a<BR>> > "tactical point." We don't know what you're talking about.<BR>> ><BR>> > We consider ourselves Christian Reconstructionists. We don't consider<BR>> > ourselves Christian Reconstructionists.<BR>> ><BR>> > Poor Doug Wilson, always being misinterpreted -- and always stuck<BR>> > between appeasing his local critics and not upsetting the<BR>> > mouth-breathing racists who buy his books.<BR>> ><BR>> > Also, Gary, who's been feeding you these links?<BR>> ><BR>> > -- ACS<BR>> > <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> =======================================================<BR>> List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR>> http://www.fsr.net <BR>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>> =======================================================<BR><BR></body>
</html>