<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana>Gary,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana>A few short points, but don't take the first one
too seriously or at all personally:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana>1. </FONT><FONT face=Arial
size=2><FONT color=#0000ff>"... sometimes a cigar is merely a
cigar."</FONT> <FONT size=3> Hmmm. I wonder what Freud or
Rorschach would say about the choice of this particular aphorism in the context
of this discussion.</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana>2. For your consideration, excepted
from <A
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Haggard">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Haggard</A>:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT face=Verdana><FONT size=2><FONT color=#0000ff><B>Ted Arthur Haggard</B>
(born </FONT></FONT></FONT><A title="June 27"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/June_27"><FONT face=Verdana size=2>June
27</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2>, </FONT><A title=1956
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1956"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>1956</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2>) is a former
</FONT><A title="United States"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>American</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2> </FONT><A
title=Evangelism href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelism"><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>evangelical</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff
size=2> </FONT><A title=Preacher
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preacher"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>preacher</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2>. Known as
<B>Pastor Ted</B> to the congregations he has served, he is the founder and
former </FONT><A title=Pastor href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastor"><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>pastor</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2> of
the </FONT><A title="New Life Church, Colorado"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Life_Church%2C_Colorado"><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>New Life Church</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff
size=2> in </FONT><A title="Colorado Springs, Colorado"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_Springs%2C_Colorado"><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>Colorado Springs</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff
size=2>, </FONT><A title=Colorado
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>Colorado</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2>; a founder of
the </FONT><A title="Association of Life-Giving Churches"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Life-Giving_Churches"><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>Association of Life-Giving Churches</FONT></A><FONT
face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2>; and was leader of the </FONT><A
title="National Association of Evangelicals"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Association_of_Evangelicals"><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>National Association of Evangelicals</FONT></A><FONT
face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2> from 2003<SUP class=reference id=_ref-0><A
title="" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Haggard#_note-0">[1]</A></SUP>
until November 2006.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2>In November 2006, he resigned or was
removed from all of his leadership positions after allegations of </FONT><A
title=Homosexual href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual"><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>homosexual</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff
size=2> sex and </FONT><A title="Substance abuse"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substance_abuse"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>drug abuse</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2> were made
by </FONT><A title="Mike Jones (personal trainer)"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Jones_%28personal_trainer%29"><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>Mike Jones</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff
size=2>, a former </FONT><A title="Male prostitution"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_prostitution"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>male prostitute</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2>.
Initially Haggard denied even knowing Mike Jones, but as a media investigation
proceeded he acknowledged that some allegations, such as his purchase of
</FONT><A title=Methamphetamine
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methamphetamine"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>methamphetamine</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana><FONT size=2><FONT
color=#0000ff>, were true. He later added "sexual immorality" to his list of
confessions.<SUP class=reference id=_ref-1><A title=""
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Haggard#_note-1">[2]</A></SUP></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana size=2>...</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2>Haggard has condemned "</FONT><A
title=Homosexuality href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality"><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>homosexual</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff
size=2> activity.” In the documentary <I><A title="Jesus Camp"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_Camp">Jesus Camp</A></I>, one scene
shows a sermon where he preaches, "we don't have to debate about what we should
think about homosexual activity. It’s written in the Bible."<SUP class=reference
id=_ref-16><A title=""
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Haggard#_note-16">[18]</A></SUP> Although
Haggard opposes </FONT><A title="Same-sex marriage"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>same-sex marriage</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2>, he
has suggested that there should be </FONT><A title="Civil union"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_union"><FONT face=Verdana size=2>civil
unions</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana><FONT size=2><FONT color=#0000ff> for
homosexual couples.<SUP class=reference id=_ref-17><A title=""
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Haggard#_note-17">[19]</A></SUP></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2>Under Haggard's leadership, the NAE
released "For the Health of the Nation: An Evangelical Call to Civic
Responsibility" in the fall of 2004,<SUP class=reference id=_ref-clout2005_0><A
title=""
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Haggard#_note-clout2005">[20]</A></SUP>
"a document urging engagement in traditional </FONT><A title="Culture war"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_war"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>culture war</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2> issues
such as </FONT><A title=Abortion
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>abortion</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff size=2> and </FONT><A
title="Gay marriage" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_marriage"><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>gay marriage</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana color=#0000ff
size=2> but also poverty, education, taxes, welfare and immigration."<SUP
class=reference id=_ref-clout2005_1><A title=""
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Haggard#_note-clout2005">[20]</A></SUP>
The NAE has stated that "</FONT><A title=Homosexual
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>homosexual</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2>
activity, like adulterous</FONT> <FONT size=2>relationships, is clearly
con­demned in the Scriptures."<SUP class=reference id=_ref-18><A title=""
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Haggard#_note-18">[21]</A></SUP></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana>Haggard is only one of many religious and political
figures, mostly Republican (for example, Spokane's last mayor), who
condemned homosexuality but were discovered to be active, if not ravenous
practitioners of such. Clear cases of reaction formation.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana>To the point: Did not Haggard exhibit the signs of
reaction formation discussed in my post that you so kindly commented upon?
Did not Haggard's own admissions about his feelings and behaviors reveal
the truth? How are the signs shown by Tony, Farris, Cultmaster Douglas
Wilson, etc, all who <STRONG>rabidly</STRONG> proclaim the same homophobia
any different from the pre-exposure signs which Haggard and his fellow
hypocrites exhibited? </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana>When someone salivates, obsesses, and loudly
harangues over some other adults' private sexual behavior with other
adults, it argues that the salivator is having some real problems
themselves. Further, one would expect a libertarian to roundly condemn
such egregious, pathological forays into matters of personal choice and
freedom.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana>3. If you or anybody want to debate the
morality of homosexuality, then I, and probably a lot others on this
list-serve, are completely willing to do so on the basis of observation and
reason, but not on the basis of unverifiable religious superstition.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana>4. You write: </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>"Does the fact that you are so
vehemently opposed to any type of religious doctrine mean that you harbor
messianic tendencies?"</FONT></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana>False assumption. I am vehemently opposed to
superstition of all kinds including religious superstition and belief in the
supernatural as a basis upon which to make moral, social, or political
decisions. However, many religious ethical dicta (though not in such
unyielding firmness and specificity) can be supported by
non-superstitious/non-supernatural observations and reasons in many cases.
</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana>For your libertarian enjoyment, perhaps you might read
<EM>The Leviathan</EM> <A
href="http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/hobbes/leviathan-contents.html">http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/hobbes/leviathan-contents.html</A>,
by Thomas Hobbes who was basically a nonbeliever (and the founder of modern
libertarianism), as an example of a purely secular defense/explanation of many
western moral beliefs. As a further example, there is a lot
of empirical validity to Buddha's description of daily human life -- a
description which led him to propose an ethic similar to the Greek Stoics
(another group containing nonbelievers/anti-superstitionists). [There is a
continuing debate over whether Buddha himself was a believer in the modern sense
of the term.]</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana>Since your premise was false, there is no need to discuss
your conclusion. Nice try though.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana>5. Speaking of reaction formation:
What would think of a hypothetical man's sexual identity and masculinity issues,
a man who would not only rabidly espouse homophobia, but would resort to an
utterly ridiculous comb-over, and who would make himself the laughing-stock of
some of his hypothetical GPS caching group by hypothetically naming himself
"Studly" in the group? Does this not remind you of the braggarts about
their sexual exploits and fertility whose wives and girlfriends frequently leave
them for poor or non-performance, or compensate for their lack of sexual prowess
by having affairs with others more skilled or take up needlepoint?
Or which braggarts secretly share Haggard's desires more strongly than
their heterosexual desires?</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana>Your humble servant,</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana><BR>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<BR><A
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">deco@moscow.com</A></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana></FONT> </P><A
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Haggard"></A></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title=jampot@adelphia.net href="mailto:jampot@adelphia.net">g. crabtree</A>
</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=deco@moscow.com href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art
Deco</A> ; <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Friday, March 16, 2007 11:42 AM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] The maladjusted and those who enable
them...</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Wayne,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> Psycho babble aside, sometimes a cigar is merely a
cigar. you are so vehemently opposed to any type of religious doctrine mean that
you harbor messianic tendencies? It would explain quite a lot about
how you deal with anyone who might dare to disagree with your exalted point of
view and multi color pronouncements.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>g</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=deco@moscow.com href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, March 16, 2007 9:29
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] The maladjusted
and those who enable them...</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana></FONT><FONT face=Verdana>Tony,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV><FONT face=Verdana>
<DIV><TD class=headword><STRONG>reaction formation</STRONG></TD><TD
style="WIDTH: 4.5pt"></TD><TD></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> (<I>plural</I>
<B>reaction formations</B>): In psychoanalysis, a defense mechanism
in which somebody condemns something that has a strong,
driving unconscious appeal.</DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG>reaction formation</STRONG> is a <A title="Defense mechanism"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_mechanism">defense mechanism</A> in
which <A title=Anxiety
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anxiety">anxiety</A>-producing or
unacceptable <A title=Emotion
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotion">emotions</A> are replaced by their
direct opposites. This mechanism is often characteristic of obsessional
neuroses. When this mechanism is overused, especially during the formation of
the ego, it can become a permanent character trait. This is often in those
with obsessional character and obsessive personality disorders. This does not
imply that its periodic usage is always obsessional, but that it can lead to
obsessional behavior. <STRONG>Example:</STRONG> A man who is
overly aroused by pornographic material who utilizes reaction formation may
take on an attitude of criticism toward the topic.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#b5a679><FONT size=5>R</FONT>EACTION<FONT
size=+2>-</FONT><FONT size=+2>F</FONT>ORMATION </FONT></STRONG>: <B><FONT
size=+1>The blocking of desire by its opposite</FONT></B>.
"Reaction-formation" is the term Freud uses to describe the mechanism whereby
the <A
href="http://www.cla.purdue.edu/English/theory/psychoanalysis/definitions/ego.html"
target=_self>ego</A> <I>reacts</I> to the impulses of the <A
href="http://www.cla.purdue.edu/English/theory/psychoanalysis/definitions/id.html"
target=_self>id</A> by creating an antithetical formation that blocks <A
href="http://www.cla.purdue.edu/English/theory/psychoanalysis/definitions/repression.html"
target=_self>repressed</A> <A
href="http://www.cla.purdue.edu/English/theory/psychoanalysis/definitions/cathexis.html"
target=_self>cathexes</A>. <STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>For example, someone
who feels homosexual desire might </FONT></STRONG><A
href="http://www.cla.purdue.edu/English/theory/psychoanalysis/definitions/repression.html"
target=_self><STRONG><FONT
color=#ff0000>repress</FONT></STRONG></A><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000> that
desire by turning it into hatred for all homosexuals.</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Perhaps you and Farris might confront and thus deal directly with your
personal demons discretely in private, rather than so
obviously exhibiting them in public. I am sure that everyone would
benefit, especially you and Farris: both your stultifying repressions
and secret frustrations could be at least partially deadened. And after
you have relived your tensions, perhaps you might be able to pass on your
personal experiences with the cure and your newly found contacts to
Cultmaster Douglas Wilson and his apparent secret admirer Douglas Jones,
both who appear to need such therapy quite badly.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Your internally inconsistent post also reveals the grave doubts you
have about your masculinity and sexual identity when you have to resort to
posting outright lies. For example:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><FONT
size=3>"</FONT>Saundra's determination to avoid reality by choosing to
doubt what has by now become commonplace, rather than investigate, is
disappointing if not surprising."</FONT></FONT></DIV><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT
size=2></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=4>
<DIV><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV>Included in this thread is a post by Saundra giving the URL to the story
from the <EM>Chicago Tribune</EM> which casts a very different light on the
story posted originally by the salivating, non-critical Farris. Saundra
investigated; you did not. It is one thing for you and the gullible,
narrow-witted Farris to delude yourselves thinking you are <EM>agent
provocateurs</EM>, but, in reality, quite another to so clearly exhibit
yourselves as sexually frustrated liars.</DIV>
<DIV><BR>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<BR><A
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">deco@moscow.com</A><BR></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV>
<DIV></FONT><FONT face=Verdana size=2>----- Original Message -----
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>From: "Tony" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:tonytime@clearwire.net"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>tonytime@clearwire.net</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>To: "Art Deco" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>deco@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana size=2>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>Cc: <</FONT><A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>vision2020@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:21
AM</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] The maladjusted and
those who enable them...</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana><BR><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT></DIV><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>> Wow Doug, you really flushed out the extremist,
sodomite activists with your <BR>> entirely reasonable and justified
outrage over the public school's abhorrent <BR>> support for inappropriate,
dirty and unhealthy behaviors. Saundra's <BR>> determination to avoid
reality by choosing to doubt what has by now become <BR>> commonplace,
rather than investigate, is disappointing if not surprising.<BR>> <BR>>
And how about Wayne's complete refusal to address your message in favor of a
<BR>> masturbatory fit of name calling? You know you have hit upon
the truth in a <BR>> persuasive manner when these folks, who seem
determined to defend the <BR>> indefensible, respond in a childlike
snit.<BR>> <BR>> Keep up the good work partner.<BR>> <BR>>
Best, -Tony<BR>> ----- Original Message ----- <BR>> From:
"Art Deco" <</FONT><A href="mailto:deco@moscow.com"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>deco@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana size=2>><BR>> To:
"Vision 2020" <</FONT><A href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>vision2020@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>><BR>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 7:25 AM<BR>> Subject: Re:
[Vision2020] And you all say that we have a political agenda?!<BR>>
<BR>> <BR>>> Replaying:<BR>>><BR>>> This kind of right
wing/religious bullshit is what happens when misguided,<BR>>> stupid,
and/or tyrannical people depend on superstition for their moral<BR>>>
beliefs rather than observation and reasoning.<BR>>><BR>>>
W.<BR>>> ----- Original Message ----- <BR>>> From: "Sue Hovey"
<</FONT><A href="mailto:suehovey@moscow.com"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>suehovey@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>><BR>>> To: "Saundra Lund" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:sslund@roadrunner.com"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>sslund@roadrunner.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana size=2>>;
<</FONT><A href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>vision2020@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>><BR>>> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:31 PM<BR>>>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] And you all say that we have a political
<BR>>> agenda?!<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>> Note Waltz's
final comment, "All our kids are great kids, whether they <BR>>>>
are<BR>>>> gay or straight," is, I believe, the point of these
classes. Too bad she<BR>>>> doesn't get
it.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Strange the Trib article doesn't even
mention the nondisclosure contract<BR>>>> bit, which, if true, would
be a significant issue for the press. I<BR>>>> seriously doubt
there is anything to the claim students have to sign a<BR>>>>
contract promising "not to tell their parents." Public school folks
who<BR>>>> work with teenagers know they tell everything--to
everyone, except maybe<BR>>>> their parents, until they turn 40 and
around the dinner table tell us all<BR>>>> that stuff we really don't
want to know now.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Mrs. Walz's daughter
was hurt when her beliefs were challenged. But<BR>>>>
that's<BR>>>> how kids grow, and adults, too. To be called on
to examine ones beliefs<BR>>>> is<BR>>>> not to say they are
necessarily wrong; but as one who grew up believing<BR>>>> pretty
much what Mrs Walz would have her daughter believe, I wish
someone<BR>>>> had challenged my attitudes when I was 17 or
so.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Thanks for the
lin.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Sue Hovey<BR>>>> ----- Original
Message ----- <BR>>gt;> From: "Saundra Lund" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:sslund@roadrunner.com"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>sslund@roadrunner.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>><BR>>>> To: "'Sue Hovey'" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:suehovey@moscow.com"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>suehovey@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana size=2>>;
<</FONT><A href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>vision2020@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>><BR>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:01
AM<BR>>>> Subject: RE: [Vision2020] And you all say that we have a
political<BR>>>>
agenda?!<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>>> Hi
Sue,<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> You might want to check out this
link to a story that was in the Chicago<BR>>>>>
Trib:<BR>>>>> </FONT><A href="http://tinyurl.com/2arte6"><FONT
face=Verdana size=2>http://tinyurl.com/2arte6</FONT></A><BR><FONT
face=Verdana><FONT size=2>>>>><BR>>>>> Not
surprisingly, the story is actually quite a bit different than
the<BR>>>>> drivel Doug Farris wants us to believe. Seems to
me the religious<BR>>>>> reactionaries need to get their stories
straight -- it's hard to make <BR>>>>> the<BR>>>>>
argument about the whole nonsense of some confidentiality contract
when<BR>>>>> everyone knows about the event in advance and parents
can opt to not <BR>>>>> have<BR>>>>> their children
participate. Notice, too, the names & how Ellen
Waltz,<BR>>>>> whose name appears in the Trib, seems to be
changing her story
:-P<BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>> Saundra
Lund<BR>>>>> Moscow, ID<BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to
<BR>>>>> do<BR>>>>> nothing.<BR>>>>> -
Edmund Burke<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> ***** Original material
contained herein is Copyright 2006 through life<BR>>>>> plus 70
years, Saundra Lund. Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or
<BR>>>>> reproduce<BR>>>>> outside the Vision 2020
forum without the express written permission of<BR>>>>> the
author.*****<BR></FONT></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>=======================================================<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>