Debbie wrote:<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/2/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Debbie Gray</b> <<a href="mailto:graylex@yahoo.com">graylex@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Dan, you're not convinced of global warming or you're<br>not convinced that Al Gore is offsetting his power
<br>consumption/etc by purchasing CO2 reductions?<br><br>CO2 reductions are a very innovative way to reduce CO2<br>outputs OVERALL. Whether he does it by using<br>solar/wind power and lives totally off the grid OR by<br>purchasing CO2 reductions, the net reduction in CO2
<br>outputs is the same.<br><br>How is this hypocritical? And how does it change his<br>message? </blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Given Al Gore's wealth, wouldn't he make even more of a powerful statement if he purchased green power to offset the CO2 emissions connected to his lifestyle, and also downsized his energy consumption, thus reducing CO2 outputs even more? Not everyone has the disposable wealth to purchase CO2 reductions connected to their outputs, as Al Gore can.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>For Al Gore to be living with such a high rate of energy consumption does set a bad example, to my mind, and so the charges of hypocrisy have some merit, though I do not think this damages the objective facts regarding the warnings about global warming that Al Gore is to be applauded for publicizing.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Purchasing CO2 credits for green power or on the carbon trading markets is a partial solution to the global warming crisis, but downsizing energy consumption in absolute amounts is absolute necessary to achieve the reductions in CO2 atmospheric output that are necessary, and is especially critical in the USA, with the highest per capita energy consumption of any nation on Earth.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The USA in general sets a poor example for the world given our per capita energy consumption. And many of the citizens of poorer nations cannot afford to purchase green energy credits to offset their CO2 outputs. They need all the fossil fuel energy they are using just to attempt to bring themselves out of poverty. Alternative energy is a luxury for these nations they cannot afford.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Ted Moffett</div><br> </div>