<html>
<body>
Hi Wayne:<br><br>
Thanks for your post on abortion, which, as always, was well
reasoned. You are correct that getting the terms of the debate
right is the key to clearing the surrounding emotional and rhetorical
fog.<br><br>
The term "human being" is equivocal, especially when it is used
in the abortion debate. That's why I insist on the distinction
between moral and legal persons and human being as a biological
category.<br><br>
The fact that all reasonable people would recognize non-human ET as a
person protected by our Constitution demonstrates that the clear meaning
of human being in the Declaration of Independence is a moral and legal
person.<br><br>
Do the rest of you sense a lot of flailing about down there in the
Potlatch smog?<br><br>
Nick Gier<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">The issue of abortion has many
facets. One should be very obvious: Those at <br>
odds are arguing in part over the meaning of terms like "the
beginning of <br>
life", "human being", etc. Such arguments are only
useful if recognized as <br>
such and a set of definitions agreed upon so that the real issues can be
<br>
debated. If either or both parties fail to do this, the resulting
arguments <br>
are just emotional puffery on the part of those insisting that their
<br>
definitions are the correct ones. People are free to choose how
they define <br>
and use language.<br><br>
The abortion issue is a very emotional one. I do not know any
pro-choice <br>
person who thinks that abortion is something that should be warmly <br>
encouraged except in special cases. I, for one, wish that the
number of <br>
situations where an abortion is an option could be reduced through
various <br>
strategies including the educated use of birth control. I take this
<br>
position because I don't believe that in a free society people can be
<br>
persuaded in any great number from engaging in activities that could
result <br>
in conception. The fact remains that unfortunately undesired
pregnancies do <br>
occur. The point of contention is that who should decide what to do
about <br>
such occurrences: Should it be the woman who is pregnant and most
likely <br>
the one who will be impacted the greatest by the decision to abort or not
or <br>
someone else?<br><br>
Another very troubling aspect of this debate is that frequently pro-life
<br>
advocates base their position solely or in large part on their particular
<br>
superstitious/religious beliefs. For Christians, there is very
little <br>
biblical justification for being pro-life without a great deal of
contortion <br>
of scripture. In fact, in the two places in the Bible where
abortion is <br>
directly discussed the position taken is morally neutral except with
respect <br>
to a private property damage claim in one case, or in the other case,
<br>
prescribes an action which would most likely lead to an aborted
fetus.<br><br>
<br>
One aspect of this debate is fraught with dishonesty and hypocrisy:
So <br>
called libertarians arguing against personal choice.<br><br>
The fundamental belief of classical libertarianism is that the government
<br>
(and others) should stay out of individuals' personal choices in their
<br>
lives.<br><br>
Those so-called libertarians who are pro-life (mostly men) apparently
<br>
believe that personal choice should not be limited only when it is their
<br>
personal choice, not some other's choice whose lives mostly likely would
be <br>
greatly affected by such choices. Many so-called "religious
libertarians" <br>
are truly hypocrites. Their credo is that personal choice should
not be <br>
limited except when it conflicts with their particular religious <br>
beliefs/superstitions, many of which are very restrictive and horribly
<br>
draconian.<br><br>
<br>
Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<br>
deco@moscow.com<br><br>
<br><br>
----- Original Message ----- <br>
From: "david sarff" <davesway@hotmail.com><br>
To: <debismith@moscow.com><br>
Cc: <vision2020@moscow.com><br>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 8:06 AM<br>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Compassion for All Life<br><br>
<br>
> Yes, this is a troubling factor.<br>
> I'm pretty sure there really is not a Soy version of Tony Baloney.
He is <br>
> now<br>
> engaged in seeing his own reflection in others and is striking out
at the<br>
> ugliness. Frankly, I openly suppose that he was not loved when he
needed <br>
> it<br>
> most, during developmental years and uses attention seeking tools to
<br>
> verify<br>
> his existence. We literally have the screaming tantrum of a baby
when not<br>
> getting attention his way. Sadly this format is used as little more
than a<br>
> squeaky toy, like a pet dog might. A child in this position likely
needs<br>
> outside forces tending to it, but that is his job now and the best
action<br>
> when this situation occurs is to not respond. As you are indeed
basically<br>
> pointing out.<br>
> We can talk around it though.<br>
> This kind of problem will continue on this list and across the
globe. To <br>
> be<br>
> sure there are many persons of differing beliefs, sensitivities,
shapes,<br>
> colors and sexes that wisely avoid any emotional stabbing. The
content of<br>
> this and other topics is important to many. If the list is to stay
open, <br>
> we<br>
> must cope with even the most selfish and cognitively
handicapped.<br>
><br>
> Thank you Debi, with no demands or expectations, my invitation
remains.<br>
> Dave<br>
><br>
><br>
>>>This is why more women are not involved in this particular
thread...<br>
>>Debi R-S<br>
><br>
><br>
>><br>
>>From:
"Tony" <tonytime@clearwire.net><br>
>>To:
"Tom Hansen" <thansen@moscow.com><br>
>>Date sent: Sun, 28 Jan 2007
17:35:46 -0800<br>
>>Copies to:
vision2020@moscow.com<br>
>>Subject: Re:
[Vision2020] Compassion for All Life<br>
>><br>
>>Tom, for God's sake, would you call what Charles Manson had
his<br>
>>followers do to Sharon Tate, an "operation?" How
then can you<br>
>>characterize the equally barbaric practice of ripping an
innocent<br>
>>child from it's mother's womb and then summarily trash canning
the<br>
>>bloody remains, as a medical procedure??<br>
>><br>
>>Think, you misguided enabler! A man who intentionally
causes the<br>
>>violent death of an innocent child, is NOT a
"physician" but simply a<br>
>>more polished Charley Manson. The result is the same:
violent and<br>
>>unnecessary death.<br>
>><br>
>>When judgment day comes, if there is such a thing, may God have
mercy<br>
>>on your soul, Tom, for countenancing our modern age's most
horrific<br>
>>crime.<br>
>><br>
>>-T<br>
>> ----- Original Message -----<br>
>> From: Tom Hansen<br>
>> To: 'Scott Dredge' ; vision2020@moscow.com<br>
>> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 6:05 AM<br>
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Compassion for All
Life<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Two things that legalizing abortions (prior to the
third trimester)<br>
>> accomplishes:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> 1) Reduces mandated influence of the
government over women's<br>
>> personal lives.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> 2) Provides availability of sterilized
environments and<br>
>> trained/qualified physicians for such an
operation.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> To believe that abortions will not occur if they are
not legal is<br>
>> absolutely ludicrous. To believe that the
number of abortions has<br>
>> increased since Roe v. Wade is just as
ignorant. Perhaps the number<br>
>> of REPORTED abortions has increased, possibly due to
a drastic<br>
>> reduction in abortions being performed in back
alleys with coat<br>
>> hangers.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Seeya round town, Moscow.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Tom "I'm Pro-Choice and I Vote"
Hansen<br>
>><br>
>> Moscow, Idaho<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> "Don't pray in my school and I won't think in
your church."<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> - Author Unknown<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>>--------<br>
>><br>
>> From: vision2020-bounces@moscow.com<br>
>>
[<a href="mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com" eudora="autourl">
mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com</a>] On Behalf Of Scott Dredge<br>
>> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:03 PM To:
vision2020@moscow.com<br>
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Compassion for All
Life<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Tony,<br>
>><br>
>> You can oppose abortion all you want. The fact
is that whether or<br>
>> not abortion remains legalized or whether it is
completely banned<br>
>> will not directily impact you. You personally
gain no rights nor<br>
>> lose any rights as abortion restrictions ebb and
flow.<br>
>><br>
>> But would your position on "compassion for all
life" change at all<br>
>> if you were affected? For instance, let's say
that I need half of<br>
>> your liver to survive because for [insert any
reason] my own liver<br>
>> is failing. Let's say that an operation to
split your liver carries<br>
>> no more risk of death to you than that of a woman in
child birth.<br>
>> Let's also say that the recovery time from this
operation is no more<br>
>> burdensome than what women typically go through from
late term<br>
>> pregnancies through child birth. Your liver
will regenerate back to<br>
>> full size 6 months after the operation. The
question then I have<br>
>> for you is this: should you be allowed to make the
choice of whether<br>
>> or not to donate half of your liver to save my life
or should the<br>
>> government be allowed to strap you to a gurney
against your will and<br>
>> take half of your liver to save me in the name of
"compassion for<br>
>> all life"?<br>
>><br>
>> Looking forward to your bobbing and weaving response
- if you have<br>
>> any response at all.<br>
>><br>
>> -Scott<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>>--------<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>
=======================================================<br>
>> List services made available by First Step
Internet,<br>
>> serving the communities of the Palouse since
1994.<br>
>>
<a href="http://www.fsr.net/" eudora="autourl">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
>>
<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" eudora="autourl">
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
>>
=======================================================<br>
>><br>
>>=======================================================<br>
>> List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>
>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>
>>
<a href="http://www.fsr.net/" eudora="autourl">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
>>
<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" eudora="autourl">
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
>>=======================================================<br>
><br>
>
_________________________________________________________________<br>
> Get live scores and news about your team: Add the Live.com Football
Page<br>
>
<a href="http://www.live.com/?addtemplate=football" eudora="autourl">
http://www.live.com/?addtemplate=football</a><br>
><br>
><br><br>
<br>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
<br>
> =======================================================<br>
> List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>
>
<a href="http://www.fsr.net/" eudora="autourl">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
>
<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" eudora="autourl">
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
> ======================================================= <br><br>
=======================================================<br>
List services made available by First Step Internet, <br>
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<br>
<a href="http://www.fsr.net /" eudora="autourl">
http://www.fsr.net
</a> <br>
<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" eudora="autourl">
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
=======================================================</blockquote>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<font size=2>"Truth is the summit of being; justice is the
application of it to human affairs."<br>
--Ralph Waldo Emerson<br><br>
"Abstract truth has no value unless it incarnates in human beings
who represent it, by proving their readiness to die for it."<br>
--Mohandas Gandhi<br><br>
"Modern physics has taught us that the nature of any system cannot
be discovered by dividing it into its component parts and studying each
part by itself. . . .We must keep our attention fixed on the whole and on
the interconnection between the parts. The same is true of our
intellectual life. It is impossible to make a clear cut between science,
religion, and art. The whole is never equal simply to the sum of its
various parts." --Ma</font><font size=1>x Planck<br><br>
</font>Nicholas F. Gier<br>
Professor Emeritus, Department of Philosophy, University of Idaho<br>
1037 Colt Rd., Moscow, ID 83843<br>
<a href="http://users.adelphia.net/~nickgier/home.htm" eudora="autourl">
http://users.adelphia.net/~nickgier/home.htm<br>
</a>208-882-9212/FAX 885-8950<br>
President, Idaho Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO<br>
<a href="http://users.adelphia.net/~nickgier/ift.htm" eudora="autourl">
http://users.adelphia.net/~nickgier/ift.htm<br><br>
</a></body>
</html>