The subject of anonymity has been brought up again. I could not care less if<br>someone prefers to use an anonymous moniker or not, obviously, though it's<br>contradictory and amusing that certain Kirkers and/or Kirk defenders choose to<br>be anonymous without evidently the slightest pang of conscience while the <br>"evils" of anonymity are being decried from "their" pulpit and posted profusely on<br>"their" pastor's blog. The hypocrisy of waxing sanctimoniously against<br>anonymity with silence towards their anonymous, pompous, contemptuous,<br>snippy supporters is deafening. A liar has a liar's heart whether he uses his <br>given name or not. Attacking the messenger, not the message, is the real goal<br>of these hypocrites, so it's no surprise why D.W. and kind rage so in their <br>denunciation of "all things" anonymous and rabidly hunt to find out who's posting<br>what, but only surprising that they'd be so transparent about it--on second
<br>thought, no it's not. A seared, serrated, arrogant conscience seems to know<br>no limits nor shame. Imprecatory prayers and wild banshees are the true bed<br>partners. If they are of integrity, it should not matter unless one fears for his <br>agenda being thwarted--and as good, solid postmillennial Calvinists that shouldn't <br>enter their minds, believing their plans and God's will for their postmillennial, <br>cultural renaissance age are one and the same. It would be certainly "fixed" in<br>all eternity. But then, what became of Calvin's Geneva and Puritan America.<br>Well, of course, in our egotistical stupor it'll all be different, because we're us!--<br>and times have changed--though Ecclesiastes 1:9 states, "...and there is nothing<br>new under the sun." History has proven to repeat itself due to the fallibility of<br>man, and these egocentrics who believe God approves of lying under certain<br>circumstances (thus diminishing
His ability to accomplish His plans soley<br>through His uprightness of character) and have to rationalize their nasty barbed<br>tongues by adhering to "the serrated edge defense" instead of following the words<br>and life of Christ (not to mention numerous other sins within their own families<br>and congregants), have the audacity to think they will usher in the perfect age. <br>It will take Christ, Himself, ruling as beneficent dictator to straighten out this<br>mess, but of that day and hour no one but the Father knows (Mark 13:32). <br>Until that time Believers are commanded to occupy (continue working at their<br>vocations) until He comes (Luke 19:13), watch and pray (Mark 13:33-37), and<br>discern the signs of the times (Matt. 16:3). The initial "one world" coming will<br>not be to your liking, and how can you reclaim "your" kingdom by using<br>ignominious means to bring it about. This is not by the God of Scripture.<br><br>Concerning more on
my position of anonymity, it's been addressed in a post to<br>a Kirker last August and in another concerning Michael Servetus around a <br>couple months back. Those that my posts are intended for know who they are,<br>and any other interested party can research the subjects that were brought up. <br>Those Believers truly interested in truth are commanded to go to Scripture<br>(Eph. 6:17, John 5:39, John 7:52, Isaiah 34:16, {II Tim. 3:16}) and examine<br>(Acts 17:11) what *anyone* tells you in its light. No one should take anyone's<br>"word for it" without doing their own personal and thorough examination of Holy<br>Writ. The true church is not equivalent to God, but is the bride of Christ made up<br>of fallible, though forgiven, individuals. For those non-Kirkers who find <br>disagreement with my anonymity, so be it; I simply disagree. I'm well aware<br>Who holds me accountable and I don't take it lightly, and likewise anything I may<br>say of
worth I can take no credit for. Wisdom dictates, at this time, my<br>anonymity in lieu of any "holy harassment" from the self-inflated holy Christian<br>jihadists.<br><br>On another note, while Michael Metzler neither needs nor probably desires any<br>defense from me, concerning a post recently addressed to him in regards to the<br>"vast" amount of followers who "adoringly" follow an individual as being indicative<br>of soundness of doctrine and mind and evidence of a sterling and stalwart <br>character, many would do well to remember Nazi Germany among others.<br>Would that people be ever discerning and vigilant.<br><br><Scimitar><br><p> 
<hr size=1>Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on
<a href="http://answers.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTEwOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx">Yahoo! Answers</a>.