<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Not being a reader of USA Today, I missed this interesting
article... Of course, despite the interesting angle, it highlights the
superficiality of USA Today, in a way. How could they only list two
of the ten people in Congress who, according to the paper, "voted right"
both times?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>BDL</FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><FONT
size=3></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=jeanlivingston@turbonet.com
href="mailto:jeanlivingston@turbonet.com">Bruce&Jean Livingston (E-mail)</A>
</DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Monday, October 30, 2006 7:36 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> 2 wars, 2 votes in Congress, only 10 who got both
right</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><!--StartFragment --><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3></FONT>
<DIV id=ynbody>
<DIV class=printstory id=ynstory>
<H1>2 wars, 2 votes in Congress, only 10 who got both right </H1><!-- END HEADLINE -->
<DIV id=ynmain><!-- BEGIN STORY BODY -->
<DIV id=storybody>
<DIV class=storyhdr>
<P><EM class=timedate>Mon Oct 30, 7:04 AM ET</EM> <IMG
src="cid:02d701c6fca0$be9ec180$6ee8a8c0@fd.org"></P>
<P><A
href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/2wars2votesincongressonly10whogotbothright">http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/2wars2votesincongressonly10whogotbothright</A></P>
<DIV class=spacer></DIV></DIV>
<P>Voting to send the nation to war is one of the rarest and most important
decisions a member of Congress can make. It's not just a matter of gambling with
lives; it risks the nation's standing in the world and the fabric of U.S.
society, which a lengthy conflict can rip apart.</P>
<P></P>
<P>Twice in the past 15 years lawmakers had to make this constitutionally
required choice about Iraq, first in 1991 to evict Iraqi forces from Kuwait and
again in 2002 to authorize a pre-emptive war against Saddam Hussein.</P>
<P></P>
<P>With the benefit of hindsight, it's clear the vote to go to war in 1991 was
the correct one. </P>
<P></P>
<P>The first President Bush assembled a broad international coalition and used
overwhelming force to fight a quick war that reversed Saddam's aggression in
Kuwait but avoided the problems of occupying Iraq. No other option seemed likely
to push Iraq back. </P>
<P></P>
<P>Although the case for war was strong, the votes were less so: 250-183 in the
House and just 52-47 in the Senate.</P>
<P></P>
<P>Just as certainly, the wiser vote in 2002 was to deny the second President
Bush authorization to invade Iraq. Despite failing to rally most U.S. allies,
Bush was preparing to launch a far more ambitious and risky war. </P>
<P></P>
<P>But Congress, perhaps emboldened by the successful post-9/11 invasion of
Afghanistan a year earlier, too easily accepted the widespread (but mistaken)
belief that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. </P>
<P></P>
<P>Some members who had voted "no" in 1991 wanted to exorcise that vote. Public
opinion, including opinions voiced by this page, favored passing the resolution,
at least to give Bush the leverage he sought to force Saddam to give in
peacefully. </P>
<P></P>
<P>The votes were overwhelming: 296-133 in the House, and 77-23 in the Senate.
But the war that followed five months later turned out to be tragically
ill-conceived, poorly planned and based on a faulty premise.</P>
<P></P>
<P>Haunted by Vietnam </P>
<P></P>
<P>So how many of the hundreds of members of Congress eligible to vote both
times were on the right side of history by supporting the first Iraq war and
opposing the second? Just 10.</P>
<P></P>
<P>Two senators and eight House members voted both "yes" in 1991 and "no" in
2002. The small group includes six Democrats, three Republicans and one
Republican-turned-Independent. Seven are still in office.</P>
<P></P>
<P>The list reveals a group of independent thinkers neither reflexively hawkish
nor dovish. Their experiences offer cautionary lessons as the nation struggles
to extract itself from Iraq and faces new threats of war.</P>
<P></P>
<P>One of the 10 is Rep. John Dingell (news, bio, voting record), a prickly and
powerful Democrat from Michigan who has served in Congress since 1955. His story
is revealing.</P>
<P></P>
<P>In 1991, he supported the Gulf War to curb Saddam's dangerous expansionism.
Shortly before the 2002 vote, as Dingell tells it, Vice President Cheney and CIA
Director George Tenet brought him and three other House members to a
claustrophobic room high in the Capitol to lobby them to vote "yes."</P>
<P></P>
<P>Dingell, now 80, was haunted by an earlier experience. He'd been a member of
Congress in 1964, when it hurriedly approved the Tonkin Gulf Resolution that
authorized the use of force in Vietnam. </P>
<P></P>
<P>It, too, was based on shoddy evidence. "Of the bad votes I've made, and I've
made more than a few, that was probably the worst," Dingell says now. </P>
<P></P>
<P>The misbegotten war that had flowed from the vote 38 years earlier made
Dingell wary. The congressman asked to see the evidence that Saddam had weapons
of mass destruction and ties to al-Qaeda. </P>
<P>Cheney and Tenet told him it was classified. Dingell countered that he had as
good a security clearance as anyone in the room. Again, he was rebuffed. After
four such exchanges, Dingell says, he concluded there was no such evidence. He
voted against the war resolution.</P>
<P>Struggling for answers </P>
<P>On the Republican side, Rep. Jim Leach (news, bio, voting record) of Iowa,
who supported the first Gulf War, voted "no" in 2002 for reasons both prophetic
(the wrong kind of war could weaken the fight against terrorism "and undercut
core American values and leadership around the world") and mistaken (a U.S.
invasion would provoke Saddam to attack Israel with biological weapons).</P>
<P>Refusing to use force when it's necessary can be as destructive as racing to
a war that should be avoided. The trick is knowing the difference. </P>
<P>"Anyone who is not conflicted in their judgment is not thinking seriously,"
Leach said shortly before his 2002 vote. That's the only appropriate way to
approach such a fateful decision. </P>
<P>Like everyone else, those who made the right decision twice are struggling
for answers about what to do next in Iraq. Leach argues for a phased withdrawal,
starting now. </P>
<P>Dingell demands that the president either withdraw or provide enough
additional troops, money and combat supplies to win. </P>
<P>Amid all the uncertainty about the future, it's increasingly clear that the
nation would have been better served had more members of Congress asked the
question Dingell did in 2002: Where's the proof? </P>
<P>It's a question members of the next Congress might have to ask again, about
Iran or North Korea or somewhere else. </P>
<P>As Americans go to the polls Nov. 7, they should look for candidates able to
see beyond the passions of the moment, and buck the party line if necessary,
when making the most profound choice facing our elected representatives.</P>
<P></P>
<DIV class=spacer></DIV></DIV><!-- END STORY BODY --></DIV>
<DIV class=spacer></DIV></DIV></DIV><!-- END MAIN CONTENT --><!-- BEGIN FOOTER -->
<DIV id=ynfeet>
<P id=copyright>Copyright © 2006 <A
href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20061030/cm_usatoday/$arg%7Breferurl%7D">USA
TODAY</A>, a division of <A href="http://www.gannett.com/">Gannett Co.
Inc</A>.<BR></P><!-- start footer -->
<SCRIPT language=javascript> var ADFadids = "1894153,3918774,3892108,1030392"; function ADFlaunch() {var w; var l="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12f3jish5/M=224039.1983420.3465435.1919853/D=news/S=57018364:FOOT/_ylt=At8GaiLxhgEr8cgjToRX71H8B2YD/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1162257668/A=1030392/R=0/id=adfeedback/SIG=12gthj1ns/*http://surveys.yahoo.com/user_ad_feedback?source=57018364:FOOT&.q28=news&.q26="+ADFadids; w=window.open(l,"AdFeedbackWin","toolbar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable,location=no,height=400,width=640"); }</SCRIPT>
<TABLE width=750>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top align=middle><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt">Copyright © 2006
Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.<BR><A
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12f3jish5/M=224039.1983420.3465435.1919853/D=news/S=57018364:FOOT/_ylt=At8GaiLxhgEr8cgjToRX71H8B2YD/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1162257668/A=1030392/R=1/SIG=1124ddvo1/*http://help.yahoo.com/help/news/">Questions
or Comments</A><BR><A
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12f3jish5/M=224039.1983420.3465435.1919853/D=news/S=57018364:FOOT/_ylt=At8GaiLxhgEr8cgjToRX71H8B2YD/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1162257668/A=1030392/R=2/SIG=11a1ak88p/*http://privacy.yahoo.com/privacy/us/news">Privacy
Policy</A> -<A
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12f3jish5/M=224039.1983420.3465435.1919853/D=news/S=57018364:FOOT/_ylt=At8GaiLxhgEr8cgjToRX71H8B2YD/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1162257668/A=1030392/R=3/SIG=1136qnvkg/*http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Terms
of Service</A> - <A
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12f3jish5/M=224039.1983420.3465435.1919853/D=news/S=57018364:FOOT/_ylt=At8GaiLxhgEr8cgjToRX71H8B2YD/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1162257668/A=1030392/R=4/SIG=11lp7krrc/*http://docs.yahoo.com/info/copyright/copyright.html">Copyright/IP
Policy</A> - <A href="javascript:ADFlaunch()">Ad
Feedback</A></SPAN></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>