<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-smaller><HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1515" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I don't know Joan and have never heard her show on
NPR, probably because I won't stoop to NPR. Never-the-less, I don't
believe she knows a thing about my family. I also do not believe I have
ever said a thing concerning her family here in this forum. She may be
eloquent and articulate in her writing but that does not give her the right, or
the knowledge, to attack my family. I have already related this to her in
a personal email but she chooses to ignore my request and continues to speak
about my family in this public forum.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>That Joan would "invite" me to write a 500 word
essay about my family for her pleasure is indication enough of her
insolence. Previously she wrote this to me, and others: <FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3>"I also invite you to submit a five-hundred word
essay on how you've managed to make your own wives happy and keep your own
marriages intact."</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I would suggest Joan work on her own relationship
and family problems. It would seem she has enough of them to keep her
busy for awhile without questioning others. I know many of you believe
Joan is some sort of goddess, witness the way Tom Hansen slobbers all over every
witty, nasty remark she makes here, but in truth she is a nasty, foul-mouthed,
militant lesbian with an agenda to push on the rest of us and she will let
nothing get in her way. She makes physical threats on people
and besmirches their families then excuses herself by claiming to be a
victim of homophobia. She is a phony, self-centered, egotistical woman who
believes she is somehow better than others and beyond the same judgments she
dishes out on a daily basis upon them.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Joan loves to put down the manhood of any male who
disagrees with her vile attacks and lifestyle and claims she alone has access to
the only real men left. I personally believe the only real men in Joan's
life are all battery operated and she is attempting to compensate for it
somehow. Why else would she continually bring the subject up?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I don't recall ever personally attacking Joan's
family and her fantasy that her lesbian sex mate is her "husband". She is
entitled to believe anything she wants to in her private life. Where I get
sick of it is when she, and others of her ilk, try to force their fantasy
beliefs on the rest of us, especially our children, through politics and
intrusion into our educational systems. People like Joan will never be
happy until the rest of us are all forced to bow down and pay tribute to her way
of life, through forced legislation. That is her real goal.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Before you all jump on the "defend Joan bandwagon"
and tell me she doesn't need defending because she is so smart, etc., save your
breath. This is my opinion, based on my observations and on the vile words
from Joan herself. I am entitled to them and I will not apologize for
recognizing them for what they really are. I am sure Joan can defend
herself. Perhaps she will come to Lewiston and kick me in the groin or
throw me on my back. That seems to be her ultimate answer to every man she
has a problem with or who disagrees with her.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Dick S.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=joanopyr@moscow.com href="mailto:joanopyr@moscow.com">Joan Opyr</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020 Moscow</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, May 15, 2006 10:45 AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Vision2020] The little gray
cells</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE><B>From:<?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-smaller>
<A
href="mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com">vision2020-bounces@moscow.com</A>
[mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com]
<?/x-tad-smaller><B><?x-tad-smaller>On Behalf Of <?/x-tad-smaller></B><?x-tad-smaller><A
href="mailto:ToeKneeTime@aol.com">ToeKneeTime@aol.com</A><?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-smaller>Sent:<?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-smaller>
Sunday, May 14, 2006 10:48 PM<?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-smaller>To:<?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-smaller>
<A href="mailto:joanopyr@moscow.com">joanopyr@moscow.com</A><?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-smaller>Cc:<?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-smaller>
<A href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A><?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-smaller>Subject:<?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Tahoma><?x-tad-smaller>
[Vision2020] Re: A response to Mr.
Opyr.....<?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Times New Roman><?bigger> <?/bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-smaller>Joan,<?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-smaller> <?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-smaller>I've
been accused of being illogical by your group. Yet your invitation to
Ed, Dick and I was predicated on a faulty premise: that I have ever claimed
to know all there is to know about human sexuality and relationships.
None of the 3 of us has ever, of course, made such a silly claim and you
know that. Perhaps you should enroll in Joe's logic course this year.<?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-smaller> <?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-smaller>So
much for your qualifications as an editor and commentator.... <?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-smaller> <?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-smaller>The
fact that I have been married once and divorced, has no bearing on my
position with regard to "gay marriage". You know this but choose to
deploy that argument because it is superficial and fallacious and thus
appeals to the liberal mind. I'm sure you'll receive the requisite
plaudits from your slavish devotees. But you will still be WRONG
Joan. You will still be a MISFIT. You will still LINGER
ALONG THE FRINGES OF SOCIETY. And you will continue to FAIL TO FIT IN.<?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-smaller> <?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-smaller>In
closing, let me remind you that MANY inappropriate, twisted and unhealthy
relationships persist for DECADES. Their longevity is hardly
proof that they are loving and
proper.<?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-smaller> <?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-smaller>--Tony <BR><?/x-tad-smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>You
see, Captain Hastings, the little gray cells, they are working overtime.
Poirot, he wonders, why does this ToeKnee Time, who lives in the stinking
Lewiston where they make what you call "the ass rag," spend so many of the
precious hours on the Moscow community chat group? Why does he not have the
life? And Poirot sees, quelque chose qui cloche! Something there is which does
not ring right! The ToeKnee and the Ed and the Dick, they have the occipital
bun and the brow ridge, no? And these have not been popular with the women
since the cave painting in Lascaux. They also have the un-ironed shirts, the
unwashed socks, and the -- how you say? -- woman-fearing bitterness that tell
Poirot that ToeKnee, Dick and Ed are unsuccessful in matrimony. They cannot
sustain the healthy adult relationship, n'est-ce pas? <BR><BR>Oui! C'est ca
l'amour! Le Trois de Stooges will not answer Poirot's question. They will slip
and slide, evade and avoid, but Poirot -- he knows the truth. And Poirot's
eye, it shall pity. He is not like the Greg Dickison. No! Poirot, he
recommends the long session avec le shrink de Viennese. He thinks that perhaps
the therapy will do the great good. The therapy for five or ten years, and
then le Cialis, or les popsicle sticks et le duct tape.<BR><BR>-- Dictated to
Miss Lemon by Monsieur Hercule Poirot, 5/15/2006 <BR>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_____________________________________________________<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>/////////////////////////////////////////////////////<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>