<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1515" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>No!</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=sdredge@yahoo.com href="mailto:sdredge@yahoo.com">Scott Dredge</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:52
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Re: [Vision2020] Why Go
After Them?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>rvcowboy,<BR><BR>Would you please provide the specific text
from v2020 emails you've received of these supposed "same
arguments"?<BR><BR>-Scott<BR><BR><B><I>rvrcowboy <<A
href="mailto:rvrcowboy@clearwire.net">rvrcowboy@clearwire.net</A>></I></B>
wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid">My
argument was that many of the same arguments used to justify same
sex<BR>marriage are also the same arguments people use to justify
bestiality,<BR>incest and sex with minor children. So what makes them
different? Some<BR>here have indicated they are appaled with those things
but use the same<BR>arguments to justify their position on
homosexuality.<BR><BR>I believe there is a common thread running through all
these issues. Why<BR>should anyone be tolerant of one of these issues but
not tolerant of the<BR>others? What makes them different? That is my point,
nothing more, nothing<BR>less.<BR><BR>Dick<BR>----- Original Message -----
<BR>From: "Chasuk" <CHASUK@GMAIL.COM><BR>To: "rvrcowboy"
<RVRCOWBOY@CLEARWIRE.NET><BR>Cc: "Vision2020"
<VISION2020@MOSCOW.COM><BR>Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:35 PM<BR>Subject:
Re: Re: [Vision2020] Why Go After Them?<BR><BR><BR>> On 5/11/06,
rvrcowboy <RVRCOWBOY@CLEARWIRE.NET>wrote:<BR>><BR>> > Most of the
arguments promoting the legalization of gay marriage appear<BR>to<BR>>
> me to be the very same arguments that would promote
beastiality,<BR>incestial<BR>> > marriage and legalization of sex with
children.<BR>><BR>> It is "bestiality," not beastiality, and
"incestuous," not incestial.<BR>> Further, you asked about incest, not
about "incestial (sic)<BR>> marriage."<BR>><BR>> So, sex between
consenting adults seems to you to be the same as sex<BR>> with animals,
sex with kin, and sex with children?<BR>><BR>> I feel sorry for your
dog, your grandmother, and
your<BR>children/grandchildren.<BR>><BR><BR>_____________________________________________________<BR>List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR>serving the communities
of the Palouse since 1994. <BR>http://www.fsr.net
<BR>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>�����������������������������������������������������<BR></RVRCOWBOY@CLEARWIRE.NET></VISION2020@MOSCOW.COM></RVRCOWBOY@CLEARWIRE.NET></CHASUK@GMAIL.COM></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_____________________________________________________<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>/////////////////////////////////////////////////////<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>