<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=2>Sunil, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=2>I caught that....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><FONT size=2><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">Bush is
indeed a leftist—although, he has fooled a few by calling himself a
“compassionate conservative.” <SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Left-wing politicians are associated with
predictable positions on a host of issues (see vision/venom 2020).. here’s a few
unorganized examples…<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
size=2> </FONT></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><FONT size=2><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">He’s a social
leftist if there ever existed one. He endorses virtually every social program
imaginable. Regrettably, he endorses multiculturalism, not tradition. Further,
he stands idle while individual rights are being supplanted by group rights—even
participates. His social liberalism is apparent on many issues. The list of
issues on which he is socially left is endless, and I’ll not include here for
fear of upsetting the masses, especially Ellen.</FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; tab-stops: 297.75pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
size=2> </FONT></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><FONT size=2><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">He’s a
leftist fiscally as well. Just check the record deficits. Although, he has had
some things happen during his presidency that qualify as excuses, he could be
far more conservative in this area. <SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
size=2> </FONT></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><FONT size=2><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">He’s a
cultural leftist as his views on homosexuality, abortion, drugs, and education
reveal… Okay, I’ll admit, he’s possibly a centrist or progressive in these
areas… <o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
size=2> </FONT></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><FONT size=2><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">And, he’s a
big government boy—a well-known left-wing attribute.
<o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
size=2> </FONT></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><FONT size=2><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">The list
could go on indefinitely. However, I believe that there exist very few true
conservatives; so, in today’s terms, he could be described as a
neocon.<o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
size=2> </FONT></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><FONT size=2><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">We obviously
could have done worse for a president. I think his heart is in the right place
and has no ulterior motives. Although, sometimes Pollyanna and overly quixotic,
his intentions are noble—in my estimation. <o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
size=2> </FONT></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><FONT size=2><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">Therefore,
from a paleocon/traditionalist/nationalist’s perspective, he is a leftist; but,
by today’s benchmark, perhaps he’s not…</FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><FONT size=2><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"></FONT></FONT></SPAN> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><FONT size=2><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS">--Ed<o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=sunilramalingam@hotmail.com
href="mailto:sunilramalingam@hotmail.com">Sunil Ramalingam</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:46
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Spam] Re: Re: [Vision2020] Why
Go After Them?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Dick,<BR><BR>Go back and look at the thread. Several
people condemned bestiality and sex <BR>with minor children. No one's
hiding anything.<BR><BR>Wait, I'm wrong. You've hidden your answer to my
question about Bush and <BR>the inspectors.<BR><BR>I can do this all day; ask
Pat Kraut.<BR><BR>And so that I don't run out of posts today without asking Ed
this question:<BR><BR>Can you demonstrate how Bush is a leftist? He's
your mess, dude, not mine.<BR><BR>Sunil<BR><BR><BR>>From: "rvrcowboy"
<<A
href="mailto:rvrcowboy@clearwire.net">rvrcowboy@clearwire.net</A>><BR>>To:
"Vision2020" <<A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A>><BR>>Subject:
Re: Re: [Vision2020] Why Go After Them?<BR>>Date: Thu, 11 May 2006
13:57:20 -0700<BR>><BR>>I find it very interesting that those who openly
advocate for gay marriage<BR>>here have very little to say about
beastiality or what they think of an<BR>>organization like NAMBLA. It
makes me wonder if they are hiding something.<BR>>Most of the arguments
promoting the legalization of gay marriage appear to<BR>>me to be the very
same arguments that would promote beastiality, incestial<BR>>marriage and
legalization of sex with children. Of course, you all know by<BR>>now
that I am a homophobe, or some such nonsense. At least a bigot, since
<BR>>I<BR>>have my own opinions about this homosexual agenda and it
differs from the<BR>>norm of this forum, which, by the way is presently the
ab-norm of the<BR>>mainstream in this country.<BR>><BR>>Dick
S.<BR>><BR>><BR><BR><BR>_____________________________________________________<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
<A
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A>
<BR> <A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>