<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>Professor,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You ask that I stop using the term "Teach". I've ask you to
acknowledge the humanity of unborn children. Referring to a professor as a
teacher hardly ranks with referring to human beings as undeserving of human
rights. You insist that I not call you names or question your
advocacy of mass killing. Wow, maybe you ought to take a course in
perspective, cuz yours is waay off.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You blurt that I avoid honest debate. But it's you who has avoided
the obvious consequences of abortion with euphemisms and intricate
rationalizations of what is simply premeditated killing. Are you sure your
name isn't Mengele?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Can't you distinguish "significant mental life" as demonstrated by, say,
Thomas Sowell or Albert Einstein from that of Cheeta or Lassie? Our
advanced intellectual capacity, our reasoning, is our purpose. Not to
swing from limbs or bark at the mailman. Still, I never said that this
capacity ALONE distinguished us as human, or person, if you prefer. The
conceptus should be regarded as a person, as a human, because it resulted from
the union of two humans, two people. If unmolested it would continue it's
development as a human being. For you or any one to set an arbitrary
developmental level as the point at which they are deserving of human rights, is
to set yourself up as God.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>And what's with this perverse insistence on putting words in my
mouth? You insist that I called God a "person", and then chew my ass as to
the implications. But I never made any such statement. Perhaps in
the process of playing Guru, you got me confused with one of your
sycophants. You accuse me of saying that we will never understand the full
nature of the soul, if it exists. Never made that statement either.
My statement was far more optimistic.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Nick, until you stop quoting out of context, putting words in my mouth and
then lecturing me from a false premise, this dialog is going nowhere.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>But it beats sitting naked in a bean bag chair while watching television
and eating Cheetos.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Best, --Tony</DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>