<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Joe, I am fairly familiar with the works of Mr.
Webster and Mr. Roget. It's the world of Gates, Jobs, and Wozniak with which I
am struggling. Is it bad form to simply hit the reply or reply all "button"
when electronically yapping back and forth? And if so, perhaps a brief
explanation as to why and the more correct technique. The last thing in the
world I'd want to do is incur the wrath of Mr. Uk or any of our more
technologically astute muchachos.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>gc (smiling manically and with near nuclear
intensity)</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=joekc@adelphia.net
href="mailto:joekc@adelphia.net">joekc@adelphia.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=jampot@adelphia.net
href="mailto:jampot@adelphia.net">g. crabtree</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, January 29, 2006 7:56
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] Wal-Mart - was
Doug Jones Says It Clearly</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P>Gary, </P>
<P>I looked it up and 'excise' means 'to edit or delete something.' I think he
was just asking us to edit parts of our previous messages so as not to send
long strings of the same passage repeated over and over. No condemnations of
'blew' or 'blow.' </P>
<P>Best, Joe<BR>--<BR>Joe Campbell<BR><BR>---- "g. crabtree" <JAMPOT
adelphia.net="#DEFAULT">wrote:<BR><BR>=============<BR>Mr. Uk, Perhaps I'm a
little dense but what is it exactly that requires the<BR>liberal use of our
"excise skills?" Is the use of the word 'blew" to course<BR>for ones sensitive
nature? Was five times in a thread too much. Or was it<BR>just the doggerel
nature of the schou/blew combination that was offensive to<BR>your poetic
soul? If you make your desires a little plainer the begging and<BR>bribery
will be completely unnecessary.<BR><BR>best,<BR>gc<BR>----- Original Message
-----<BR>From: "Chasuk" <CHASUK gmail.com="#DEFAULT"><BR>To: "Pat Kraut"
<PKRAUT moscow.com="#DEFAULT"><BR>Cc: "vision2020" <VISION2020
moscow.com="#DEFAULT"><BR>Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 4:29 PM<BR>Subject:
Re: [Vision2020] Wal-Mart - was Doug Jones Says It Clearly<BR><BR><BR>>In a
thread comprised of seven messages, I count five occurrences of
this:<BR>><BR>>"I didn't think Mr. Schou's analogy
blew"<BR>><BR>>Would you guys (pretty please, with brown sugar on top)
practice your<BR>>excise skills a little more
liberally?<BR>><BR>>Thanks!<BR>><BR>>_____________________________________________________<BR>>List
services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>>serving the communities
of the Palouse since
1994.<BR>>http://www.fsr.net<BR>>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯<BR><BR>_____________________________________________________<BR>List
services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>serving the communities of
the Palouse since
1994.<BR>http://www.fsr.net<BR>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯<BR></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>