<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face="Palatino Linotype" color=#0000ff
size=2><SPAN class=454491719-11012006>Mr. Arnold and other
Visionaries,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face="Palatino Linotype" color=#0000ff
size=2><SPAN class=454491719-11012006></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face="Palatino Linotype" color=#0000ff
size=2><SPAN class=454491719-11012006>Since I'd really hate for people to
misunderstand the legislation, I think this needs to be
addressed.</SPAN></FONT><FONT face="Palatino Linotype" color=#0000ff
size=2><SPAN class=454491719-11012006> In order or JFord, or whomever, to
be charged with a violation of the VAWA law, one would need to prove that the
<EM>intent </EM>of the post was to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass.
Expressing one's opinions (about civic or governmental issues) as part of a
<EM>dialog </EM>belies the accusation that the <EM>intent</EM> is/was to
annoy/harass/accuse/threaten. Dialog, by definition, requires two or more
participants both performing some act.
Harassment/annoyance/threats/accusation, etc. requires only one active
party--the other party to the commission of the crime is either passive or
inactive and the contact is unwanted (by the second party). Again,
as I stated in my last post about this law, the spirit under which the
legislation was enacted was to protect victims of domestic violence.
Abusing the statue by lobbing it at people with whom we simply don't see
eye-to-eye will only serve to weaken and cheapen the affect of the law when
its use really is pertinent.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face="Palatino Linotype" color=#0000ff
size=2><SPAN class=454491719-11012006></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face="Palatino Linotype" color=#0000ff
size=2><SPAN class=454491719-11012006>--Jennifer </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face="Palatino Linotype" color=#0000ff
size=2><SPAN class=454491719-11012006></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face="Palatino Linotype" color=#0000ff
size=2><SPAN class=454491719-11012006> </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT size=2>PIO Jennifer L. McFarland<BR>Latah County Sheriff's
Office<BR>Public Information Officer<BR>PO Box 8068<BR>Moscow, Idaho
83843<BR>(208) 882-2216<BR>Fax (208) 883-2281<BR><BR>Truth is the summit of
being; justice is the application of it to affairs.<BR>***Ralph Waldo
Emerson<BR><BR> </FONT> </P>
<DIV> </DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> vision2020-bounces@moscow.com
[mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Donovan
Arnold<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, January 11, 2006 11:05<BR><B>To:</B>
joekc@adelphia.net<BR><B>Cc:</B> vision2020@moscow.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE:
[Vision2020] fleecing of Moscow???<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV id=RTEContent>Joe,<BR><BR>I know for FACT that J Ford is Jackie Woolf, a
city official told me. All you have to do is check the ISP number from J Ford
and a known ISP from Jackie Woolf and see that they are the same person. You can
check both from the V2020 archives.<BR><BR>But you are free to believe what you
want, like someone borrowed her computer. I do agree however, that if J Ford had
to put her real name of Jackie Woolf on her emails she would sound more like
herself and less like an accusatory insane lunatic.<BR><BR>Her assaults against
people on V2020, including members of Christ Church, and others, under the false
name J Ford, is now a federal offense.<BR><BR>Take
Care,<BR><BR>DJA<BR><BR><BR><B><I>joekc@adelphia.net</I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid">Just
a personal belief, Donovan, but I know Jackie Woolf and I do not think that J
Ford is her.<BR><BR>Joe<BR><BR>---- Donovan Arnold <DONOVANJARNOLD2005
@yahoo.com="">wrote: <BR>> <BR>> "It is just so easy for you to point
fingers at people and yet you do NOTHING <BR>> to improve conditions of
ANYone, including yourself."--Jackie Woolf<BR>> <BR>> Jackie, I am sorry
you view my job working with the elderly and disabled as not helping anyone or
myself. But that is your right to feel that way.<BR>> <BR>> Perhaps I
should instead just go around bending people's antennas, filing false
complaints against people, enforcing my personal preferences on others, and
using foul language on the Internet while hiding my identity. <BR>>
<BR>> Take Care,<BR>> <BR>> -DJA<BR>> <BR>> PS. Oh yeah, since
your email does not give your real name, and it is annoying and harassing
others, you are now in violation of federal law, Jackie Woolf, even Doug
Wilson does not violate federal law. <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ! <BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> J Ford <PRIVATEJF32 @hotmail.com="">wrote: Prove it!<BR>>
<BR>> It is just so easy for you to point fingers at people and yet you do
NOTHING <BR>> to improve conditions of ANYone, including yourself. I mean
YOU, not your <BR>> family, not your neighbors, not your "friends" -
YOU.<BR>> <BR>> Just because you can say something doesn't mean you
should.<BR>> <BR>> I for one am getting sick of your "muck-raking and
war mongering" when you <BR>> have absolutely no intention of polishing the
shovel much less taking one up <BR>> to help clean up the dog crap YOU are
continually throwing about.<BR>> <BR>> If you have specific, provable,
tangible items - I do NOT mean just your <BR>> "impressions" or "thoughts"
or "I-believes" - to put out there, do so. <BR>> Otherwise SHUT UP!<BR>>
<BR>> J :]<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ><BR>> >No, but what
she fails to point out is that money<BR>> >collect! ed by the school
district can be used<BR>> >for raises if they do not have to use it for
new buildings<BR>> >and building repairs. Through passing a bond they
free up<BR>> >money in the MSD reserve for salaries.<BR>>
><BR>> >And yes, people did lie to us about the conditions of
the<BR>> >school in an attempt to pass the levy.<BR>> ><BR>>
<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> >keely emerinemix wrote:
Phil,<BR>> ><BR>> >The bond failed.<BR>> ><BR>> >Dr.
Donicht didn't lie.<BR>> ><BR>> >There is no fraud.<BR>>
><BR>> >Raises and other contract language are negotiated between the
Board of<BR>> >Trustees negotiators and the MEA's negotiators.<BR>>
><BR>> >I am not a negotiator.<BR>> ><BR>> >I am proud to
work with the negotiators on other board issues.<BR>> ><BR>> >Bond
money can't fund raises.<BR>> ><BR>> >Operating budget can't! fund
bonds.<BR>> ><BR>> >We have covered all of this before.<BR>>
><BR>> >I'm done.<BR>> ><BR>> >keely<BR>> ><BR>>
><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> >From:
"Shelly"<BR>> >To: ,<BR>> >Subject: RE: [Vision2020] fleecing of
Moscow???<BR>> >Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:05:40 -0800 (Pacific Standard
Time)<BR>> ><BR>> > Shawn,<BR>> ><BR>> >Please reread
my statement. It says, in a questionable form, "did I hear<BR>> >right?
Our school administrators and teachers all got better than a 4%<BR>>
>raise?" I was asking a question. Did they? I never said the 4% elleged
<BR>> >raise<BR>> >came out of the building fund.<BR>>
><BR>> >My next question for you, if your statement is factual, how
did Candice<BR>> >Donicht promise if her Bond would pass that not one
dime would go to the<BR>> >teachers in raises. And administration. But
immediately after that Bond<BR>> >passed everybody got raises. In my
book that is a falsehood.<BR>> ><BR>> >Phil Roderick<BR>>
><BR>> ><BR>> >-------Original Message-------<BR>>
><BR>> >From: Shawn Clabough<BR>> >Date: 01/09/06
18:43:13<BR>> >To: vision2020@moscow.com<BR>> >Subject: RE:
[Vision2020] fleecing of Moscow???<BR>> ><BR>> >Is this aimed at
the state administration, where it rightfully should be?<BR>> >Local
administrators do not have the flexibility to move monies earmarked<BR>>
>for salaries to building maintenance and vice versa. Also, your
statement<BR>> >“Our school administrators and teachers all got better
than a 4% raise†is<BR>> >not completely accurate.<BR>>
>Shawn<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> >From:
vision2020-bounces@moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com]<BR>>
>On Behalf Of Shelly<BR>> >Sent: Monda! y, January 09, 2006 12:11
PM<BR>> >To: vision2020@moscow.com<BR>> >Subject: [Vision2020]
fleecing of Moscow???<BR>> ><BR>> >Did I hear right? Our school
administrators and teachers all got better <BR>> >than<BR>> >a 4%
raise? Yet our schools continue to deteriorate? I also understand <BR>>
>there<BR>> >is something like 15 million dollars in trust. Wait, did
I use the right<BR>> >word, trust???????? Is this BEFORE or AFTER the
raises? Why does this keep<BR>> >happening with the same
administration?<BR>> ><BR>> >Phil Roderick<BR>> ><BR>>
><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>>
>_____________________________________________________<BR>> > List
services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>> > serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.<BR>> > http://www.fsr.net<BR>>
> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>>
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯<BR>>
><BR>>
>_________________________________________________________________<BR>>
>FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now!<BR>>
>http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/<BR>>
><BR>> >_____________________________________________________<BR>>
> List services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>> > serving
the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<BR>> >
http://www.fsr.net<BR>> > mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>>
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯<BR>>
><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>>
>---------------------------------<BR>> >Yahoo! Photos<BR>> >
Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays,
<BR>> >whatever.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
>_____________________________________________________<BR>> > List
services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>> > serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.<BR>> > http://www.fsr.net<BR>>
> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>>
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯<BR>>
<BR>>
_________________________________________________________________<BR>>
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! <BR>>
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/<BR>> <BR>>
_____________________________________________________<BR>> List services
made available by First Step Internet, <BR>> serving the communities of the
Palouse since 1994. <BR>> http://www.fsr.net <BR>>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>&! gt;
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯<BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ---------------------------------<BR>>
Yahoo! Photos<BR>> Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality
prints in your hands
ASAP.<BR><BR></PRIVATEJF32></DONOVANJARNOLD2005></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></DIV>
<P>
<HR SIZE=1>
Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover<BR><A
href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/photobooks/*http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/photos/evt=38088/*http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph//page?.file=photobook_splash.html">Photo
Books</A>. You design it and we’ll bind it!</BODY></HTML>