<div id="RTEContent">Phil Nisbet <pcnisbet1@hotmail.com> wrote:<br> <br> > You see the trouble with it all is very broad ranged. Darwinian thought <br> > leads to Social Darwinism which justifies eugenics and to very different <br> > conclusions than I think that the majority of proponents assume is the <br> > perfect world they wish to create. The same sort of thing is true of the <br> > absolute indeterminism of a Heisenbergian world of Uncertainty, in which <br> > nothing is true or certain. People tend to take these fundamental laws out <br> > to the ad absurdum, as Mead did in her suggestions of cultural relativism.<br> <br> 'Darwinian thought' has to be wrong because according to you it leads to eugenics? Is this because six million Jews died because of the consequences of eugenics during the Holocaust?<br> <br> > We got into this particular debate from a start point in my explanations of <br> > punctuated
gradualism and its advent as the dominating idea in evolutionary <br> > sciences which results in the death throws of Darwinianism. It has been an <br> > interesting side track, but has diverted us from the question, why is <br> > Darwin’s premise being taught as fact when it has been superceded?<br> <br> Darwin's premise has to be wrong and instead Stephen Jay Gould's idea of punctuated equilibrium has to be right? Is this because Gould is of Jewish heritage and Darwin wasn't?<br> <br> > All you have to do is realize that the debate between Einstein and <br> > Heisenberg was one between a Jew and a Nazi. Heisenberg’s relativism was <br> > heralded by his fellow swastika wearing heros as justification for actions <br> > they took. Einstein saw that in the world there has to be some standard of <br> > law and order that does not allow a Darwinian slaughter and that makes it <br> > not just relatively wrong, but deadly w!
rong.<br>
<br> Einstein had to be right because he was a Jew and Heisenberg had to be wrong because he wasn't?<br> <br> > As I have previously noted, the original matrix mechanics mathematics was <br> > not developed by Heisenberg, but by his boss Max Born, because Heisenberg <br> > was not a very good mathematician.<br> <br> Heisenberg couldn't do the math, but Max Born could? Is this because Born was of Jewish heritage and Heisenberg wasn't?<br> <br> Are you a racist?<br> </div><p>
<hr size=1> <a href="http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=37474/*http://promo.yahoo.com/broadband/
">Yahoo! DSL</a> Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less