<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="IncrediMail 1.0" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="BACKGROUND-POSITION: 0px 0px; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 5px 10px 10px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial" bgColor=#ffffff background="" scroll=yes ORGYPOS="0">
<TABLE id=INCREDIMAINTABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width="100%" border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD id=INCREDITEXTREGION style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; CURSOR: auto; FONT-FAMILY: Arial" width="100%">
<DIV>
<DIV>I could not agree more.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I encourage everyone to read ALL of Wayne's lengthy post here. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thank You Wayne for taking the time to express your feelings openly and honestly. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Have you talked with PD about this couple who continuously break the law? Tell them a time they can go and watch it happen. A person can only get so many citations before it turns into something else. Especially when they are endangering others. I would be curious as well as others on this list if you updated us periodically on this couple.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Shelley Roderick </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV id=IncrediOriginalMessage><I>-------Original Message-------</I></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV id=receivestrings>
<DIV dir=ltr style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt" <i><B>From:</B></I> <A href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt" <i><B>Date:</B></I> 12/19/05 18:24:40</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt" <i><B>To:</B></I> <A href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt" <i><B>Subject:</B></I> Re: [Vision2020] Health District HIV Gossip?</DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Saundra, Ted,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Ted writes:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4><FONT face=Arial size=2>"I agree with Saundra that there are disturbing signs of abandonment of the principle of innocent till proven guilty in the Mubita HIV case. But given the fact that numerous cases of death row inmates being proven innocent, after they were found guilty in a court and sentenced to death, are on record in the USA, should anyone be surprised?"</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4><BR> </DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=4>I do not think anyone wants to deny Kanay Mubita a fair trial.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>I think what is occurring in this dispute is a misunderstanding over the use of words. Perhaps a different, but real life example can help us resolve this issue in part.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>There is a couple that live over the hill from our neighborhood. Both are well known, but he more than she. Both drive at times on Saddle Ridge Road, the main line through our neighborhood (Nearing Subdivisions, South Saddle Ridge Community).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Saddle Ridge Road is gravel in part and unstriped paved in part.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>The male member of this duo frequently drives in the middle of or on his extreme left hand side of the road. He has almost hit a number of pedestrians and pets a number of times. Because he was entirely on the wrong side of the road, he has almost hit my car three times. This has also happened to other residents. Just after the first light snowstorm about three weeks ago, I saw him from the deck of our home drive more than 1/2 mile entirely on the wrong side of a very slippery road, finally disappearing around a blind curve, still on the wrong side.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>The female member of this duo does the some sort of things except much faster, including sliding around corners in her high performance car. About three years ago on U.S. Highway 95 going north just past where Estes Road enters, she passed five of us at one time, starting her pass before she could clearly see if there was any oncoming traffic. I was the last car she passed, being in the lead of 5 five cars. I was going 60 mph. I think my speedometer is fairly accurate as I check it periodically. I do not know exactly how fast she was going, but she was passing more than 2 reflective side strips to my one.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>According to a friend, both members of this duo have amassed a large number of traffic citations. Other people in our neighborhood comment on this couple's arrogantly reckless driving and express outrage and fear.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>For the acts I described above no citations have been issued and thus no court action has occurred. Hence in the meaning of "innocent - 1" (in the eyes of the legal system), they are "innocent - 1." </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>However, it is clear to me from my own observations that it is <FONT color=#ff0000><STRONG>extremely</STRONG></FONT> probable that they have both egregiously broken the law more than once. Hence, in that sense, they are not "innocent - 2 ."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Further, like the Mubita case, they are a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>The point is this: There is a difference between:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[1] Being "guilty" or not "innocent -1" in the eyes of the legal system after all the relevant proceedings have taken place, and</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[2] There is a high probability that the act which forms the basis of a criminal allegation has taken place -- not "innocent -2".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Except for a perfunctory bail hearing, little of the legal proceedings in Mubita's case have taken place, hence there is <STRONG>no</STRONG> doubt that Mubita is "innocent -1" in the eyes of the legal system.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>As for the use of "innocent - 2" as above, let's see. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>It is alleged that he has tested positive for HIV. This has been asserted by several independent news sources. It has been reported that according to the police that after first denying it, Mubita affirmed that he knew he was HIV positive. Given the huge sanctions possible against the media and especially the police for making false and defamatory statements, I choose to believe that it is extremely probable that Mubita is HIV positive. This belief is not entirely certain, and it is open to change upon new, credible information, but it appears extremely probable at this juncture.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Has Mubita had unprotected sexual relations without informing his partners of his HIV positive status? Apparently more than 20 women have came forward and asserted so. Coming forward and making such an assertion is real act of courage and exposes the asserter to all kinds of unpleasant consequences. Hence, it is highly probable that these assertions are true. Hence, again subject to new, credible information, I choose to believe that it is extremely probable that Mubita did knowingly and intentionally have unprotected sexual relations without informing his partners of his HIV status on multiple occasions.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>According the<EM> Latah Eagle</EM>, Mubita denies that he has had unprotected sex and also denies that he has had sex outside of a relationship. He first asserted to the police that he was not HIV positive, then later admitted it. He denied knowing the woman who claims having his baby. It is highly improbable that a woman would so expose herself with such a lie given the state of DNA testing today. There are other reasons why I believe that Mubita is not telling the truth but a discussion of them at this point would not be appropriate on V 2020. Hence, I do not believe Mubita.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Hence, although technically Mubita is "innocent -1,", I believe that it is extremely improbable that he is not "innocent - 2." Again, this opinion is subject to revision upon further credible information.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>As Janesta, Phil, Shelley, Ellen, and others have pointed out, this is an important public health issue. We are speaking of possible dire consequences to many individuals on the possible tree of infections resulting from his alleged actions. For acting in these public health matters, not "innocent - 2" is sufficient in my opinion.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>When there is the threat of a serious disease, mandatory public health actions include the following, sometimes related actions:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[1] Treat the disease as far as is possible/practical.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[2] Prevent the disease form spreading.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Preventing the disease from spreading includes testing those that are probable carriers, educating others about the consequences of the disease and how to avoid getting it, and to isolate via criminal/civil laws those that have demonstrated that they are knowingly and intentionally willing to engage in behavior that has some probability of spreading the disease.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>From what I have read on Vision 2020:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[1] No one is asserting that Mubita is already not "innocent - 1."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[2] Most believe that he is not "innocent - 2."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[3] Most believe that the three public health measures above should be rigorously pursued.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Pat Kraut does not believe further education is necessary or would be useful. I disagree. Sometimes people do not get the message the first time they hear it, or the second, or the third,... However, when an event like the current case happens, more people become more willing to listen and to change their behavior like using protection and getting tested not only for HIV but for other STDs.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>It has been speculated that some of what has been written will discourage people from being tested. I see no evidence of this. Quite the contrary. Several brave people have came forward in response to police requests. The more information that is disseminated, the more people will realize the danger they may be in and/or the danger they may have or may be putting loved ones or others in. People do not need to go to the public health district to be tested. Except for one group of doctors where confidentiality may be a problem (a suit was filed alleging such) people can go to their doctors or other clinics/places for confidential testing. Hence, dissemination/discussion of information such has occurred on V 2020, in my opinion, is likely to lead to more testing, not less.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>One last point: Nothing I have said should be seen a condemnation of anyone who unknowingly contacted HIV, that is, who contacted HIV without know their partners were infected. This is a most unfortunate thing.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>However, I do strongly condemn those that knowingly and intentionally engage in sexual relations without informing their partners that they are HIV positive. I also condemn those that engage in HIV risky behavior who do not get periodically tested and thus run the risk of unknowingly infecting others, including loved ones.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT size=4>Wayne A. Fox<BR>1009 Karen Lane<BR>PO Box 9421<BR>Moscow, ID 83843</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>(208) 882-7975<BR></FONT><A href="mailto:waf@moscow.com"><FONT size=4>waf@moscow.com</FONT></A><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; rem_PADDING-LEFT: 5px; rem_MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; rem_BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=Tbertruss@aol.com href="mailto:Tbertruss@aol.com">Tbertruss@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=sslund@adelphia.net href="mailto:sslund@adelphia.net">sslund@adelphia.net</A> ; <A title=CJs@Turbonet.com href="mailto:CJs@Turbonet.com">CJs@Turbonet.com</A> ; <A title=janestacarcich@yahoo.com href="mailto:janestacarcich@yahoo.com">janestacarcich@yahoo.com</A> ; <A title=vision2020@moscow.com href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=thansen@moscow.com href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">thansen@moscow.com</A> ; <A title=deco@moscow.com href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">deco@moscow.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December 18, 2005 4:34 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] Health District HIV Gossip?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=arial,helvetica><FONT lang=0 face=Arial size=2 PTSIZE="10" FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><BR>All:<BR><BR>I agree with Saundra that there are disturbing signs of abandonment of the principle of innocent till proven guilty in the Mubita HIV case. But given the fact that numerous cases of death row inmates being proven innocent, after they were found guilty in a court and sentenced to death, are on record in the USA, should anyone be surprised?<BR><BR>Vision2020 is going far beyond insisting on public safety in the discussions on Mubita's alleged conduct.<BR><BR>Those who are concerned about encouraging testing for HIV might consider the impact of on those who are afraid to get tested of what seems like an attempt to try and convict Mubita on Vision2020. Would someone want a positive HIV test to result in those who may have sexually contacted HIV from them coming forward to file legal charges, resulting in their lives and conduct dissected on a public list serve? Yes, sharing a needle is a more certain method of transferring the HIV virus than sexual relations in some cases, so anyone who finds out they are HIV positive who uses IV drugs has this possible legal ramification regarding allegations of knowingly engaging in conduct that can spread HIV. <BR><BR>The prosecutorial "climate" on Vision2020 does not encourage people coming forward to be HIV tested.<BR><BR>I offer a few corrections and comments regarding some statements in this discussion:<BR><BR>Saundra wrote:<BR><BR>Yes -- as far as *you* know with respect to *sex*. To date, transmission<BR>via IV drug abuse (and if you think we don't have a problem with IV drug<BR>abuse in our area, I encourage you to further educate yourself) is more<BR>risky than unprotected heterosexual contact.<BR><BR>If what you imply (I'm not sure why you mentioned heterosexual contact and left out homosexual contact) is that heterosexuals do not have anal sex, the most risky means for HIV transmission by sexual conduct on average, sorry, wrong. Heterosexuals engage in anal sex, though often do not report this, for obvious reasons. Gential/anal/oral lesions or sores increase the risk of HIV transmission dramatically, providing a means for blood products to enter the body. If someone has a healthy body with no sores or lesions, the odds of transmission of HIV are reduced dramatically. Anal sex on average has a higher probability of sores or lesions or entry points for blood products than genital only intercourse or oral sex between same or different sex couples. And so, devout lesbians (David Camden-Britton where are you?) are a very low risk group for HIV.<BR><BR>Concerning this comment by Shelley below, something is wrong if the Health District is releasing information to the public of any kind regarding who is or is not being HIV tested at what time according to any criteria that might identify or embarrass the individuals involved. These tests should be conducted with complete anonymity, with no information of any kind being made public or otherwise disseminated to any gossip circles regarding any criteria used to dictate who is tested or when they are tested.<BR><BR>This is a major disconnect for someone who ostensibly is attempting to encourage HIV testing to post on Vision2020 that they know the order in which the Health District is testing clients based on how high risk they are claiming knowledge of who the clients had sexual relations with. If it is true that the local Health District was releasing ANY INFORMATION OF ANY KIND outside that department regarding their testing of HIV clients (well, accept the fact they do test for HIV), unless this involved law enforcement or the courts, they need to change or enforce their polices ensuring total anonymity for HIV testing.<BR><BR>Shelley wrote:<BR><BR><B>No Saundra, this is incorrect. You can call Carol Morley at the Health District and ask her. They had "kits" to test those at "high risk." Many people were turned away with an appointment after they were counseled. The purpose of the health clinic staying open last Thursday was strictly for the high risk people that were in direct contact with Mubita as the Health Department had limited kits. There were many people who showed up who had no contact with Mubita but wanted tested. They were given appointments.<BR>---------------------------------<BR><BR>Ted Moffett<BR></B></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_____________________________________________________<BR> List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR> http://www.fsr.net <BR> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>/////////////////////////////////////////////////////<BR></DIV></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Saundra, Ted,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Ted writes:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4><FONT face=Arial size=2>"I agree with Saundra that there are disturbing signs of abandonment of the principle of innocent till proven guilty in the Mubita HIV case. But given the fact that numerous cases of death row inmates being proven innocent, after they were found guilty in a court and sentenced to death, are on record in the USA, should anyone be surprised?"</FONT><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>I do not think anyone wants to deny Kanay Mubita a fair trial.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>I think what is occurring here is a misunderstanding over the use of words. Perhaps a different, but real life example can halp us resolve this issue in part.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>There is a couple that live over the hill from our neighborhood. Both are wel known but he more than she. Both drive on Saddle Ridge Road, the mian line through our neighborhood (Nearing Subdivision, Additions, South Saddle Ridge Community).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Saddle Ridge Road is gravel in part and unstriped paved in part.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>The male member of this duo frequently drives in the middle of or on his extreme left hand side of the road. He has almost hit a number of pedestrians and pets a number of times. Because he was enetirely on the wrong side of the road, he has almost hit my car three times. Just after the first light snowstorm about three weeks ago, I saw him from the deck of our home drive more than 1/2 mile entirely on the wrong side of the road, finally disappearing around a blid curve, still on the wrong side.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>The female member of this duo does the some sort of things except much faster including sliding around corners in her high performance car. About three years ago on highway 95 going north just past where Estes Road enters, she passed five of us at one time, starting her pass before she could clearly see if there was any oncoming traffic. I was the last car she passed, being in the lead of 5 five cars. I was going 60 mph. I think my speedometer is fairly accurate as I check it periodically. I do not know exactly how fast she was going, but she was passing more than 2 refective side strips to my one.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>According to a friend, both have amassed a large number of citations. Other people in our neighborhood comment on this couple's arrogantly wreckless driving.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>For the acts I described above no citations have been issued and thus no court action has occurred. Hence in the meaning of "innocent - 1" in the eyes of the legal system, they are "innocent." </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>However, it is clear to me from my own observations that it is <FONT color=#ff0000><STRONG>extremely</STRONG></FONT> probable that they have broken the law more than once. Hence, in that sense, they are not "innocent -2 ."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Further, like the Mubita case, there is a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>The point is this: There is a difference between:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[1] Being "guilty" in the the eyes of the legal system after all the relevant proceedings have taken place, and</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[2] There is a high probablity that the act which forms the basis of a criminal allegation has taken place.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Except for a perfunctory bail hearing, little of the legal proceedings in Mubita's case have taken place, hence there is no doubt that Mubita is "innocent -1" in the eyes of the legal system.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>As for the use of "innocent - 2" as above, let's see. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>It is alleged that he has tested postive for HIV. This has been asserted in several independent news sources. It has been reported that according to the police that after first denying it, Mubita affirmed that he knew he was HIV positive. Given the huge sanctions possible against the media and especially the police for making false and defamatory statements, I choose to beleive that it is extremely probable</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; rem_PADDING-LEFT: 5px; rem_MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; rem_BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=Tbertruss@aol.com href="mailto:Tbertruss@aol.com">Tbertruss@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=sslund@adelphia.net href="mailto:sslund@adelphia.net">sslund@adelphia.net</A> ; <A title=CJs@Turbonet.com href="mailto:CJs@Turbonet.com">CJs@Turbonet.com</A> ; <A title=janestacarcich@yahoo.com href="mailto:janestacarcich@yahoo.com">janestacarcich@yahoo.com</A> ; <A title=vision2020@moscow.com href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=thansen@moscow.com href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">thansen@moscow.com</A> ; <A title=deco@moscow.com href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">deco@moscow.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December 18, 2005 4:34 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] Health District HIV Gossip?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=arial,helvetica><FONT lang=0 face=Arial size=2 PTSIZE="10" FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><BR>All:<BR><BR>I agree with Saundra that there are disturbing signs of abandonment of the principle of innocent till proven guilty in the Mubita HIV case. But given the fact that numerous cases of death row inmates being proven innocent, after they were found guilty in a court and sentenced to death, are on record in the USA, should anyone be surprised?<BR><BR>Vision2020 is going far beyond insisting on public safety in the discussions on Mubita's alleged conduct.<BR><BR>Those who are concerned about encouraging testing for HIV might consider the impact of on those who are afraid to get tested of what seems like an attempt to try and convict Mubita on Vision2020. Would someone want a positive HIV test to result in those who may have sexually contacted HIV from them coming forward to file legal charges, resulting in their lives and conduct dissected on a public list serve? Yes, sharing a needle is a more certain method of transferring the HIV virus than sexual relations in some cases, so anyone who finds out they are HIV positive who uses IV drugs has this possible legal ramification regarding allegations of knowingly engaging in conduct that can spread HIV. <BR><BR>The prosecutorial "climate" on Vision2020 does not encourage people coming forward to be HIV tested.<BR><BR>I offer a few corrections and comments regarding some statements in this discussion:<BR><BR>Saundra wrote:<BR><BR>Yes -- as far as *you* know with respect to *sex*. To date, transmission<BR>via IV drug abuse (and if you think we don't have a problem with IV drug<BR>abuse in our area, I encourage you to further educate yourself) is more<BR>risky than unprotected heterosexual contact.<BR><BR>If what you imply (I'm not sure why you mentioned heterosexual contact and left out homosexual contact) is that heterosexuals do not have anal sex, the most risky means for HIV transmission by sexual conduct on average, sorry, wrong. Heterosexuals engage in anal sex, though often do not report this, for obvious reasons. Gential/anal/oral lesions or sores increase the risk of HIV transmission dramatically, providing a means for blood products to enter the body. If someone has a healthy body with no sores or lesions, the odds of transmission of HIV are reduced dramatically. Anal sex on average has a higher probability of sores or lesions or entry points for blood products than genital only intercourse or oral sex between same or different sex couples. And so, devout lesbians (David Camden-Britton where are you?) are a very low risk group for HIV.<BR><BR>Concerning this comment by Shelley below, something is wrong if the Health District is releasing information to the public of any kind regarding who is or is not being HIV tested at what time according to any criteria that might identify or embarrass the individuals involved. These tests should be conducted with complete anonymity, with no information of any kind being made public or otherwise disseminated to any gossip circles regarding any criteria used to dictate who is tested or when they are tested.<BR><BR>This is a major disconnect for someone who ostensibly is attempting to encourage HIV testing to post on Vision2020 that they know the order in which the Health District is testing clients based on how high risk they are claiming knowledge of who the clients had sexual relations with. If it is true that the local Health District was releasing ANY INFORMATION OF ANY KIND outside that department regarding their testing of HIV clients (well, accept the fact they do test for HIV), unless this involved law enforcement or the courts, they need to change or enforce their polices ensuring total anonymity for HIV testing.<BR><BR>Shelley wrote:<BR><BR><B>No Saundra, this is incorrect. You can call Carol Morley at the Health District and ask her. They had "kits" to test those at "high risk." Many people were turned away with an appointment after they were counseled. The purpose of the health clinic staying open last Thursday was strictly for the high risk people that were in direct contact with Mubita as the Health Department had limited kits. There were many people who showed up who had no contact with Mubita but wanted tested. They were given appointments.<BR>---------------------------------<BR><BR>Ted Moffett<BR></B></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_____________________________________________________<BR> List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR> http://www.fsr.net <BR> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>/////////////////////////////////////////////////////<BR></DIV></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Saundra, Ted,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Ted writes:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4><FONT face=Arial size=2>"I agree with Saundra that there are disturbing signs of abandonment of the principle of innocent till proven guilty in the Mubita HIV case. But given the fact that numerous cases of death row inmates being proven innocent, after they were found guilty in a court and sentenced to death, are on record in the USA, should anyone be surprised?"</FONT><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>I do not think anyone wants to deny Kanay Mubita a fair trial.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>I think what is occurring here is a misunderstanding over the use of words. Perhaps a different, but real life example can halp us resolve this issue in part.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>There is a couple that live over the hill from our neighborhood. Both are wel known but he more than she. Both drive on Saddle Ridge Road, the mian line through our neighborhood (Nearing Subdivision, Additions, South Saddle Ridge Community).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Saddle Ridge Road is gravel in part and unstriped paved in part.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>The male member of this duo frequently drives in the middle of or on his extreme left hand side of the road. He has almost hit a number of pedestrians and pets a number of times. Because he was enetirely on the wrong side of the road, he has almost hit my car three times. Just after the first light snowstorm about three weeks ago, I saw him from the deck of our home drive more than 1/2 mile entirely on the wrong side of the road, finally disappearing around a blid curve, still on the wrong side.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>The female member of this duo does the some sort of things except much faster including sliding around corners in her high performance car. About three years ago on highway 95 going north just past where Estes Road enters, she passed five of us at one time, starting her pass before she could clearly see if there was any oncoming traffic. I was the last car she passed, being in the lead of 5 five cars. I was going 60 mph. I think my speedometer is fairly accurate as I check it periodically. I do not know exactly how fast she was going, but she was passing more than 2 refective side strips to my one.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>According to a friend, both have amassed a large number of citations. Other people in our neighborhood comment on this couple's arrogantly wreckless driving.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>For the acts I described above no citations have been issued and thus no court action has occurred. Hence in the meaning of "innocent - 1" in the eyes of the legal system, they are "innocent." </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>However, it is clear to me from my own observations that it is <FONT color=#ff0000><STRONG>extremely</STRONG></FONT> probable that they have broken the law more than once. Hence, in that sense, they are not "innocent -2 ."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Further, like the Mubita case, there is a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>The point is this: There is a difference between:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[1] Being "guilty" in the the eyes of the legal system after all the relevant proceedings have taken place, and</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[2] There is a high probablity that the act which forms the basis of a criminal allegation has taken place.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Except for a perfunctory bail hearing, little of the legal proceedings in Mubita's case have taken place, hence there is no doubt that Mubita is "innocent -1" in the eyes of the legal system.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>As for the use of "innocent - 2" as above, let's see. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>It is alleged that he has tested postive for HIV. This has been asserted in several independent news sources. It has been reported that according to the police that after first denying it, Mubita affirmed that he knew he was HIV positive. Given the huge sanctions possible against the media and especially the police for making false and defamatory statements, I choose to beleive that it is extremely probable</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; rem_PADDING-LEFT: 5px; rem_MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; rem_BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=Tbertruss@aol.com href="mailto:Tbertruss@aol.com">Tbertruss@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=sslund@adelphia.net href="mailto:sslund@adelphia.net">sslund@adelphia.net</A> ; <A title=CJs@Turbonet.com href="mailto:CJs@Turbonet.com">CJs@Turbonet.com</A> ; <A title=janestacarcich@yahoo.com href="mailto:janestacarcich@yahoo.com">janestacarcich@yahoo.com</A> ; <A title=vision2020@moscow.com href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=thansen@moscow.com href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">thansen@moscow.com</A> ; <A title=deco@moscow.com href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">deco@moscow.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December 18, 2005 4:34 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] Health District HIV Gossip?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=arial,helvetica><FONT lang=0 face=Arial size=2 PTSIZE="10" FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><BR>All:<BR><BR>I agree with Saundra that there are disturbing signs of abandonment of the principle of innocent till proven guilty in the Mubita HIV case. But given the fact that numerous cases of death row inmates being proven innocent, after they were found guilty in a court and sentenced to death, are on record in the USA, should anyone be surprised?<BR><BR>Vision2020 is going far beyond insisting on public safety in the discussions on Mubita's alleged conduct.<BR><BR>Those who are concerned about encouraging testing for HIV might consider the impact of on those who are afraid to get tested of what seems like an attempt to try and convict Mubita on Vision2020. Would someone want a positive HIV test to result in those who may have sexually contacted HIV from them coming forward to file legal charges, resulting in their lives and conduct dissected on a public list serve? Yes, sharing a needle is a more certain method of transferring the HIV virus than sexual relations in some cases, so anyone who finds out they are HIV positive who uses IV drugs has this possible legal ramification regarding allegations of knowingly engaging in conduct that can spread HIV. <BR><BR>The prosecutorial "climate" on Vision2020 does not encourage people coming forward to be HIV tested.<BR><BR>I offer a few corrections and comments regarding some statements in this discussion:<BR><BR>Saundra wrote:<BR><BR>Yes -- as far as *you* know with respect to *sex*. To date, transmission<BR>via IV drug abuse (and if you think we don't have a problem with IV drug<BR>abuse in our area, I encourage you to further educate yourself) is more<BR>risky than unprotected heterosexual contact.<BR><BR>If what you imply (I'm not sure why you mentioned heterosexual contact and left out homosexual contact) is that heterosexuals do not have anal sex, the most risky means for HIV transmission by sexual conduct on average, sorry, wrong. Heterosexuals engage in anal sex, though often do not report this, for obvious reasons. Gential/anal/oral lesions or sores increase the risk of HIV transmission dramatically, providing a means for blood products to enter the body. If someone has a healthy body with no sores or lesions, the odds of transmission of HIV are reduced dramatically. Anal sex on average has a higher probability of sores or lesions or entry points for blood products than genital only intercourse or oral sex between same or different sex couples. And so, devout lesbians (David Camden-Britton where are you?) are a very low risk group for HIV.<BR><BR>Concerning this comment by Shelley below, something is wrong if the Health District is releasing information to the public of any kind regarding who is or is not being HIV tested at what time according to any criteria that might identify or embarrass the individuals involved. These tests should be conducted with complete anonymity, with no information of any kind being made public or otherwise disseminated to any gossip circles regarding any criteria used to dictate who is tested or when they are tested.<BR><BR>This is a major disconnect for someone who ostensibly is attempting to encourage HIV testing to post on Vision2020 that they know the order in which the Health District is testing clients based on how high risk they are claiming knowledge of who the clients had sexual relations with. If it is true that the local Health District was releasing ANY INFORMATION OF ANY KIND outside that department regarding their testing of HIV clients (well, accept the fact they do test for HIV), unless this involved law enforcement or the courts, they need to change or enforce their polices ensuring total anonymity for HIV testing.<BR><BR>Shelley wrote:<BR><BR><B>No Saundra, this is incorrect. You can call Carol Morley at the Health District and ask her. They had "kits" to test those at "high risk." Many people were turned away with an appointment after they were counseled. The purpose of the health clinic staying open last Thursday was strictly for the high risk people that were in direct contact with Mubita as the Health Department had limited kits. There were many people who showed up who had no contact with Mubita but wanted tested. They were given appointments.<BR>---------------------------------<BR><BR>Ted Moffett<BR></B></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_____________________________________________________<BR> List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR> http://www.fsr.net <BR> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>/////////////////////////////////////////////////////<BR></DIV></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Saundra, Ted,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Ted writes:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4><FONT face=Arial size=2>"I agree with Saundra that there are disturbing signs of abandonment of the principle of innocent till proven guilty in the Mubita HIV case. But given the fact that numerous cases of death row inmates being proven innocent, after they were found guilty in a court and sentenced to death, are on record in the USA, should anyone be surprised?"</FONT><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>I do not think anyone wants to deny Kanay Mubita a fair trial.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>I think what is occurring here is a misunderstanding over the use of words. Perhaps a different, but real life example can halp us resolve this issue in part.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>There is a couple that live over the hill from our neighborhood. Both are wel known but he more than she. Both drive on Saddle Ridge Road, the mian line through our neighborhood (Nearing Subdivision, Additions, South Saddle Ridge Community).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Saddle Ridge Road is gravel in part and unstriped paved in part.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>The male member of this duo frequently drives in the middle of or on his extreme left hand side of the road. He has almost hit a number of pedestrians and pets a number of times. Because he was enetirely on the wrong side of the road, he has almost hit my car three times. Just after the first light snowstorm about three weeks ago, I saw him from the deck of our home drive more than 1/2 mile entirely on the wrong side of the road, finally disappearing around a blid curve, still on the wrong side.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>The female member of this duo does the some sort of things except much faster including sliding around corners in her high performance car. About three years ago on highway 95 going north just past where Estes Road enters, she passed five of us at one time, starting her pass before she could clearly see if there was any oncoming traffic. I was the last car she passed, being in the lead of 5 five cars. I was going 60 mph. I think my speedometer is fairly accurate as I check it periodically. I do not know exactly how fast she was going, but she was passing more than 2 refective side strips to my one.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>According to a friend, both have amassed a large number of citations. Other people in our neighborhood comment on this couple's arrogantly wreckless driving.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>For the acts I described above no citations have been issued and thus no court action has occurred. Hence in the meaning of "innocent - 1" in the eyes of the legal system, they are "innocent." </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>However, it is clear to me from my own observations that it is <FONT color=#ff0000><STRONG>extremely</STRONG></FONT> probable that they have broken the law more than once. Hence, in that sense, they are not "innocent -2 ."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Further, like the Mubita case, there is a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>The point is this: There is a difference between:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[1] Being "guilty" in the the eyes of the legal system after all the relevant proceedings have taken place, and</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[2] There is a high probablity that the act which forms the basis of a criminal allegation has taken place.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Except for a perfunctory bail hearing, little of the legal proceedings in Mubita's case have taken place, hence there is no doubt that Mubita is "innocent -1" in the eyes of the legal system.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>As for the use of "innocent - 2" as above, let's see. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>It is alleged that he has tested postive for HIV. This has been asserted in several independent news sources. It has been reported that according to the police that after first denying it, Mubita affirmed that he knew he was HIV positive. Given the huge sanctions possible against the media and especially the police for making false and defamatory statements, I choose to beleive that it is extremely probable</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; rem_PADDING-LEFT: 5px; rem_MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; rem_BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=Tbertruss@aol.com href="mailto:Tbertruss@aol.com">Tbertruss@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=sslund@adelphia.net href="mailto:sslund@adelphia.net">sslund@adelphia.net</A> ; <A title=CJs@Turbonet.com href="mailto:CJs@Turbonet.com">CJs@Turbonet.com</A> ; <A title=janestacarcich@yahoo.com href="mailto:janestacarcich@yahoo.com">janestacarcich@yahoo.com</A> ; <A title=vision2020@moscow.com href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=thansen@moscow.com href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">thansen@moscow.com</A> ; <A title=deco@moscow.com href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">deco@moscow.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December 18, 2005 4:34 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] Health District HIV Gossip?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=arial,helvetica><FONT lang=0 face=Arial size=2 PTSIZE="10" FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><BR>All:<BR><BR>I agree with Saundra that there are disturbing signs of abandonment of the principle of innocent till proven guilty in the Mubita HIV case. But given the fact that numerous cases of death row inmates being proven innocent, after they were found guilty in a court and sentenced to death, are on record in the USA, should anyone be surprised?<BR><BR>Vision2020 is going far beyond insisting on public safety in the discussions on Mubita's alleged conduct.<BR><BR>Those who are concerned about encouraging testing for HIV might consider the impact of on those who are afraid to get tested of what seems like an attempt to try and convict Mubita on Vision2020. Would someone want a positive HIV test to result in those who may have sexually contacted HIV from them coming forward to file legal charges, resulting in their lives and conduct dissected on a public list serve? Yes, sharing a needle is a more certain method of transferring the HIV virus than sexual relations in some cases, so anyone who finds out they are HIV positive who uses IV drugs has this possible legal ramification regarding allegations of knowingly engaging in conduct that can spread HIV. <BR><BR>The prosecutorial "climate" on Vision2020 does not encourage people coming forward to be HIV tested.<BR><BR>I offer a few corrections and comments regarding some statements in this discussion:<BR><BR>Saundra wrote:<BR><BR>Yes -- as far as *you* know with respect to *sex*. To date, transmission<BR>via IV drug abuse (and if you think we don't have a problem with IV drug<BR>abuse in our area, I encourage you to further educate yourself) is more<BR>risky than unprotected heterosexual contact.<BR><BR>If what you imply (I'm not sure why you mentioned heterosexual contact and left out homosexual contact) is that heterosexuals do not have anal sex, the most risky means for HIV transmission by sexual conduct on average, sorry, wrong. Heterosexuals engage in anal sex, though often do not report this, for obvious reasons. Gential/anal/oral lesions or sores increase the risk of HIV transmission dramatically, providing a means for blood products to enter the body. If someone has a healthy body with no sores or lesions, the odds of transmission of HIV are reduced dramatically. Anal sex on average has a higher probability of sores or lesions or entry points for blood products than genital only intercourse or oral sex between same or different sex couples. And so, devout lesbians (David Camden-Britton where are you?) are a very low risk group for HIV.<BR><BR>Concerning this comment by Shelley below, something is wrong if the Health District is releasing information to the public of any kind regarding who is or is not being HIV tested at what time according to any criteria that might identify or embarrass the individuals involved. These tests should be conducted with complete anonymity, with no information of any kind being made public or otherwise disseminated to any gossip circles regarding any criteria used to dictate who is tested or when they are tested.<BR><BR>This is a major disconnect for someone who ostensibly is attempting to encourage HIV testing to post on Vision2020 that they know the order in which the Health District is testing clients based on how high risk they are claiming knowledge of who the clients had sexual relations with. If it is true that the local Health District was releasing ANY INFORMATION OF ANY KIND outside that department regarding their testing of HIV clients (well, accept the fact they do test for HIV), unless this involved law enforcement or the courts, they need to change or enforce their polices ensuring total anonymity for HIV testing.<BR><BR>Shelley wrote:<BR><BR><B>No Saundra, this is incorrect. You can call Carol Morley at the Health District and ask her. They had "kits" to test those at "high risk." Many people were turned away with an appointment after they were counseled. The purpose of the health clinic staying open last Thursday was strictly for the high risk people that were in direct contact with Mubita as the Health Department had limited kits. There were many people who showed up who had no contact with Mubita but wanted tested. They were given appointments.<BR>---------------------------------<BR><BR>Ted Moffett<BR></B></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_____________________________________________________<BR> List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR> http://www.fsr.net <BR> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>/////////////////////////////////////////////////////<BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV> </DIV></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD id=INCREDIFOOTER width="100%">
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD width="100%"></TD>
<TD id=INCREDISOUND vAlign=bottom align=middle></TD>
<TD id=INCREDIANIM vAlign=bottom align=middle></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><SPAN id=IncrediStamp><SPAN dir=ltr><A href="http://www.incredimail.com/index.asp?id=54475"><IMG alt="Add FUN to your email - CLICK HERE!" hspace=0 src="http://www2.incredimail.com/contents/stamps/imstp_emo_en.gif" align=baseline border=0></A></SPAN></SPAN></BODY></HTML>