<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1515" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>"Bill Clinton publicly objected to the executive order, saying he wanted
all his papers open."</DIV>
<DIV>Sandy Berger shreded the papers he was worried about!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=deco@moscow.com href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, October 10, 2005 10:06
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Vision2020] 10-10-05 NY Times
OP/ED: Bush's Veil Over History </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>From: <EM>New York Times</EM> 10-10-05</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV class=timestamp>October 10, 2005</DIV>
<DIV class=kicker></DIV>
<H1><NYT_HEADLINE type=" " version="1.0">Bush's Veil Over History
</NYT_HEADLINE></H1><NYT_BYLINE type=" " version="1.0">
<DIV class=byline>By KITTY KELLEY</DIV></NYT_BYLINE><NYT_TEXT>
<DIV id=articleBody>
<P>Washington</P>
<P>SECRECY has been perhaps the most consistent trait of the George W. Bush
presidency. Whether it involves refusing to provide the names of oil
executives who advised Vice President Dick Cheney on energy policy,
prohibiting photographs of flag-draped coffins returning from Iraq, or
forbidding the release of files pertaining to Chief Justice John Roberts's
tenure in the Justice Department, President Bush seems determined to control
what the public is permitted to know. And he has been spectacularly effective,
making Richard Nixon look almost transparent.</P>
<P>But perhaps the most egregious example occurred on Nov. 1, 2001, when
President Bush signed Executive Order 13233, under which a former president's
private papers can be released only with the approval of both that former
president (or his heirs) and the current one. </P>
<P>Before that executive order, the National Archives had controlled the
release of documents under the Presidential Records Act of 1978, which
stipulated that all papers, except those pertaining to national security, had
to be made available 12 years after a president left office. </P>
<P>Now, however, Mr. Bush can prevent the public from knowing not only what he
did in office, but what Bill Clinton, George H. W. Bush and Ronald Reagan did
in the name of democracy. (Although Mr. Reagan's term ended more than 12 years
before the executive order, the Bush administration had filed paperwork in
early 2001 to stop the clock, and thus his papers fall under it.)</P>
<P>Bill Clinton publicly objected to the executive order, saying he wanted all
his papers open. Yet the Bush administration has nonetheless denied access to
documents surrounding the 177 pardons President Clinton granted in the last
days of his presidency. Coming without explanation, this action raised
questions and fueled conspiracy theories: Is there something to hide? Is there
more to know about the controversial pardon of the fugitive financier Marc
Rich? Is there a quid pro quo between Bill Clinton and the Bushes? Is the
current president laying a secrecy precedent for pardons he intends to
grant?</P>
<P>The administration's effort to grandfather the Reagan papers under the act
also raised a red flag. President Bush's signature stopped the National
Archives from a planned release of documents from the Reagan era, some of
which might have shed light on the Iran-contra scandal and illuminated the
role played by the vice president at the time, George H. W. Bush. </P>
<P>What can be done to bring this information to light? Because executive
orders are not acts of Congress, they can be overturned by future commanders
in chief. But this is a lot to ask of presidents given the free pass handed
them by Mr. Bush. (And it could put a President Hillary Clinton in a bind when
it came to her own husband's papers.)</P>
<P>Other efforts to rectify the situation are equally problematic.
Representative Henry Waxman, Democrat of California, has repeatedly introduced
legislation to overturn Mr. Bush's executive order, but the chances of a
Republican Congress defying a Republican president are slim. </P>
<P>There is also a lawsuit by the American Historical Association and other
academic and archival groups before the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia. A successful verdict could force the National Archives
to ignore the executive order and begin making public records from the Reagan
and elder Bush administrations. </P>
<P>Unless one of these efforts succeeds, George W. Bush and his father can see
to it that their administrations pass into history without examination. Their
rationales for waging wars in the Middle East will go unchallenged. There will
be no chance to weigh the arguments that led the administration to condone
torture by our armed forces. The problems of federal agencies entrusted with
public welfare during times of national disaster - 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina
- will be unaddressed. Details on no-bid contracts awarded to politically
connected corporations like Halliburton will escape scrutiny, as will the
president's role in Environmental Protection Agency's policies on water and
air polluters.</P>
<P>This is about much more than the desires of historians and biographers -
the best interests of the nation are at stake. As the American Political
Science Association, one plaintiff in the federal lawsuit, put it: "The only
way we can improve the operation of government, enhance the accountability of
decision-makers and ultimately help maintain public trust in government is for
people to understand how it worked in the past."</P><NYT_AUTHOR_ID>
<P id=authorId>Kitty Kelley is the author of "The Family: The Real Story of
the Bush Dynasty."</P></NYT_AUTHOR_ID></DIV></NYT_TEXT></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_____________________________________________________<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>