<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1515" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I no longer believe anything the NYT writes or has
anything to do with. They have an agenda and they print everything to the hate
they have for half this nation. It is not reporting the truth. It is the truth
they want no matter how much damage they do. </FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=deco@moscow.com href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, September 09, 2005 9:23
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Vision2020] 09-09-05 NY Times:
Powell Calls His U.N. Speech aLasting Blot on His Record</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4><EM>NY Times</EM>:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV class=timestamp>September 9, 2005</DIV><NYT_HEADLINE type=" "
version="1.0">
<H1>Powell Calls His U.N. Speech a Lasting Blot on His
Record</H1></NYT_HEADLINE><NYT_BYLINE type=" " version="1.0">
<DIV class=byline>By <A title="More Articles by Steven R. Weisman"
href="http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?ppds=bylL&v1=STEVEN R. WEISMAN&fdq=19960101&td=sysdate&sort=newest&ac=STEVEN R. WEISMAN&inline=nyt-per"><FONT
color=#000066>STEVEN R. WEISMAN</FONT></A></DIV></NYT_BYLINE><NYT_TEXT>
<DIV id=articleBody>
<P>WASHINGTON, Sept. 8 - The former secretary of state, Colin L. Powell, says
in a television interview to be broadcast Friday that his 2003 speech to the
United Nations, in which he gave a detailed description of Iraqi weapons
programs that turned out not to exist, was "painful" for him personally and
would be a permanent "blot" on his record.</P>
<P>"I'm the one who presented it on behalf of the <A
title="More news and information about United States."
href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/unitedstates/index.html?inline=nyt-geo"><FONT
color=#000066>United States</FONT></A> to the world," Mr. Powell told Barbara
Walters of ABC News, adding that the presentation "will always be a part of my
record."</P>
<P>Asked by Ms. Walters how painful this was for him, Mr. Powell replied: "It
was painful. It's painful now." Asked further how he felt upon learning that
he had been misled about the accuracy of intelligence on which he relied, Mr.
Powell said, "Terrible." He added that it was "devastating" to learn later
that some intelligence agents knew the information he had was unreliable but
did not speak up.</P>
<P>Mr. Powell also implied in the interview that the United States did not go
to war in <A title="More news and information about Iraq."
href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/iraq/index.html?inline=nyt-geo"><FONT
color=#000066>Iraq</FONT></A> with sufficient troops to secure the country and
failed to keep sufficient Iraqi forces to help stabilize the country. </P>
<P>"What we didn't do in the immediate aftermath of the war was to impose our
will on the whole country with enough troops of our own, with enough troops
from coalition forces or by re-creating the Iraqi forces, armed forces, more
quickly than we are doing now," he said.</P>
<P>But with Iraq still violent and plagued by sectarian conflict, the United
States has "little choice but to keep investing in the Iraqi armed forces and
to do everything we can to increase their size and their capability and their
strength." </P>
<P>Since leaving office in January, Mr. Powell has declined interview
requests. But his expressions of regret about the weapons intelligence and the
lack of troops were consistent with many of his statements in office,
especially after it became clear that Iraq had none of the weapons that Mr.
Powell had said it was stockpiling.</P>
<P>He acknowledged several times that intelligence failures lay behind his
presentation on the eve of the Iraq war two years ago, but he has never
expressed any regret about the war itself. Asked by Ms. Walters, "When the
president made the decision to go to war, you were for it?" Mr. Powell said,
"Yes."</P>
<P>Asked about editorials asserting that he had put loyalty "ahead of
leadership," Mr. Powell parried the question. "Well, loyalty is a trait that I
value, and yes, I am loyal," he replied. "And there are some who say, 'Well,
you shouldn't have supported it, you should have resigned.' But I'm glad that
Saddam Hussein is gone."</P>
<P>Mr. Powell said he did not blame George J. Tenet, then the director of
central intelligence, for the failures and did not believe that Mr. Tenet
tried to mislead him.</P>
<P>"No, George Tenet did not sit there for five days with me, misleading me,"
he said, referring to the week he spent at the Central Intelligence Agency
reviewing the evidence on Iraq before making his presentation to the United
Nations. "There were some people in the intelligence community who knew at
that time that some of these sources were not good, and shouldn't be relied
upon, and they didn't speak up. That devastated
me."</P></DIV></NYT_TEXT><BR></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_____________________________________________________<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>