<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2668" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=4>All,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Is outing an important U.S. operative a traitorous
act?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>If it appears highly that Karl Rove did, in fact, participate
in the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plume, then:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[1] Should he be removed from his position
as the president's chief advisor?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>[2] Should he be charged and prosecuted for
treason? If convicted, should he be given the same sentence similar
traitors have been?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>From: <EM>The Washington Post</EM>,
07-12-05</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=5>Bush Aide Deflects Questions On
Rove<BR></FONT></STRONG>Democrats Seek Firing in Leak Case<BR>
<P><FONT size=-1>By Mike Allen and Dan Balz<BR>Washington Post Staff
Writers<BR>Tuesday, July 12, 2005; A01<BR></FONT>
<P><NITF>
<P>President Bush's aides put up a wall yesterday when questioned about
revelations that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove had discussed the
role of CIA official Valerie Plame with a reporter despite past White House
assertions that he was not involved in her unmasking.</P>
<P>Engulfed by questions at two combative briefings, White House press secretary
Scott McClellan cited the continuing criminal investigation to say that he would
not discuss conversations Rove had with a reporter about Plame before her name
was published, or say whether Bush's pledge to fire anyone involved in leaking
classified information still stands.</P>
<P>"No one wants to get to the bottom of it more than the president of the
United States," McClellan said, echoing his two-year-old position on the case.
"And I think the way to be most helpful is to not get into commenting on it
while it is an ongoing investigation."</P>
<P>Democrats, emboldened by having the White House on the defensive, began a
campaign to pressure Rove to give up his security clearances, answer questions
before Congress and even resign.</P>
<P>Whether a crime occurred remains the focus of special prosecutor Patrick J.
Fitzgerald, but the latest revelations also leave White House credibility at
stake, given past statements by the president, McClellan and others. Over the
weekend, Newsweek reported that Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper, in an
internal e-mail from July 2003, cited Rove as saying that administration critic
Joseph C. Wilson IV, a former ambassador, had gone to Niger on a fact-finding
trip involving Iraq's nuclear weapons programs at the behest of his wife. At the
same time, according to Cooper's account, Rove also noted that she worked for
the CIA on issues of weapons of mass destruction.</P>
<P>The e-mail did not say that Rove identified Plame by name, and Rove has
maintained from the beginning that he neither knew her name nor leaked it to
anyone. Columnist Robert D. Novak first reported Plame's identity in July 2003.
The law says that for a violation to occur, a government official must have
deliberately identified a covert agent, and must have known that the agent was
under cover and that the government was trying to keep the agent's identity
secret. It was the issue of credibility, more than of criminal culpability, that
produced some of the most aggressive questioning at a White House briefing in
recent memory -- but no answers.</P>
<P>Asked about the matter on nine occasions over the years, Bush has said he
welcomed the investigation, called the name disclosure "a very serious matter,"
and declared that the sooner investigators "find out the truth, the better, as
far as I'm concerned."</P>
<P>"I want to know the truth," Bush told reporters in September 2003 after news
of the investigation had burst into headlines. "If anybody has got any
information, inside our administration or outside our administration, it would
be helpful if they came forward with the information so we can find out whether
or not these allegations are true and get on about the business."</P>
<P>In 2003, McClellan said it was "a ridiculous suggestion" that Rove was
involved. "I've made it very clear, he was not involved, that there's no truth
to the suggestion that he was," he said. He also said that any culprit in the
White House should be fired "at a minimum."</P>
<P>At one point, McClellan vowed: "The president has set high standards, the
highest of standards, for people in his administration. He's made it very clear
to people in his administration that he expects them to adhere to the highest
standards of conduct. If anyone in this administration was involved in it, they
would no longer be in this administration."</P>
<P>Bush replied "yes" when asked in June 2004 if he would fire anyone who leaked
the agent's name.</P>
<P>Democrats seized on that statement yesterday, urging Bush to follow through
by dismissing Rove and including a call for congressional hearings. Among the
flurry of critical statements was one from Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid
(D-Nev.), who said the leak must be treated as a breach of national security.
"The White House promised if anyone was involved in the Valerie Plame affair,
they would no longer be in this administration," he said. "I trust they will
follow through on this pledge. If these allegations are true, this rises above
politics and is about our national security."</P>
<P>Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.), last year's Democratic presidential nominee, said
in an e-mail to supporters: "It's perfectly clear that Rove -- the person at the
center of the slash and burn, smear and divide tactics that have come to
characterize the Bush Administration -- has to go."</P>
<P>McClellan demurred yesterday when asked several times whether Bush will stand
by his pledge to fire anyone who leaked classified information. "This question
is coming up in the context of this ongoing investigation," he said. "Our policy
continues to be that we're not going to get into commenting on an ongoing
criminal investigation from this podium."</P>
<P>McClellan's previous denials of White House involvement over nearly two years
also occurred when the matter was already under investigation. But he said
yesterday that at some point after Fitzgerald's inquiry began, "those overseeing
the investigation . . . said that it would be their preference that we not get
into discussing it while it is ongoing."</P>
<P>In retrospect, it appears clear that many White House statements about the
case were carefully constructed -- giving the impression of being general
denials even as the words were narrowly focused on specific allegations. During
briefings, McClellan repeatedly challenged reporters to provide him "specific
information" when asking about Rove, and he frequently limited his answers about
White House involvement in the case to mean the act of leaking classified
information. On a few occasions, however, he offered broad denials about Rove
and other top aides.</P>
<P>Robert Luskin, Rove's attorney, acknowledged over the weekend that his client
had discussed the subject -- without naming Plame -- with Cooper, one of the two
reporters threatened with jail time for not cooperating with Fitzgerald. Cooper
avoided jail last week after being granted a waiver by Rove to testify. New York
Times reporter Judith Miller was sent to jail and remains there after refusing
to testify.</P>
<P>Newsweek printed the contents of Cooper's July 2003 e-mail, in which he
recounts to his bureau chief an interview with Rove that is typical of the
cryptic exchanges that reporters often have with high-level officials on
sensitive matters -- vague, but enough to help promote or squelch a story.
Cooper said that the conversation was on "double super secret background" and
that Rove gave him "a big warning not to get too far out on Wilson." It occurred
as the White House engaged in a major damage-control effort after Wilson said
there was no basis for saying Iraq was seeking nuclear weapons material in
Africa.</P>
<P>Luskin said again yesterday that there is nothing inconsistent with what
Cooper's e-mail said and what Rove has said throughout the inquiry, and he said
his client continues to cooperate fully with Fitzgerald, including the
prosecutor's request for Rove and his attorney not to publicly discuss the
case.</P>
<P>"It puts Karl in a no-win position," Luskin said. "If he doesn't talk to
[reporters], he subjects himself to criticisms like we're hearing from the
Democrats on why he won't come forward and talk about his role. But if he does .
. . he runs the risk of being accused of not cooperating with the
investigation."</P>
<P>At a televised briefing yesterday reporters grilled McClellan repeatedly by
quoting his own words back to him. "I'm well aware, like you, of what was
previously said," he responded, "and I will be glad to talk about it at the
appropriate
time."</P></NITF><!-- start the copyright for the articles --></DIV></BODY></HTML>