<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Georgia"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Georgia color=#000000 size=3>
<DIV>Visionaries and Donovan.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Doug Wilson will not be saying Mass in the Kibbie Dome. (I think that
is one point that even Doug and I can agree on.) I am not suggesting that
Doug Wilson and his flock should be prevented from celebrating the Lord's
Supper in their church. I asked the question "should a religious
celebration take place on state owned property when that worship services
includes elements that conflict with state law. I don't know which
"right" takes precedence. But whatever the correct/legal answer is, you
didn't bother to address my question. You made up your own question,
and probably are still out of breath from ranting about it.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I didn't attack Roman Catholics, or the doctrines of Christ Church (which
regarding communion, Donovan, are distinctly different than the RC doctrine of
transubstantiation). </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Rose Huskey</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>