<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Wayne,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I would like to see participation from those who "lurk" and read V202 but
do not post. Everyone has an opinion on things and because I am over 65 I have
license to state my opinion! ;-)) There are even those on V2020 who will
occasionally disagree with me! (shall we discuss crosswalks) I am only speaking
for me but I would like to invite those who are only monitoring or reading to
please participate. I'm sure we can all learn from your views.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Dick Schmidt</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=deco@moscow.com href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:37
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Vision2020] Whither Vision
2020?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>All,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Mark Seman, Bill London, Burt Sid, et al, have recently
posted notes calling notice to the original rules and intentions of Vision
2020 and presenting data showing some of us are not adhering to the original
rules.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Like many other organizations, Vision 2020 has evolved into
something not envisioned by its founders.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>In my opinion, freedom of expression is one of the most, if
not the most precious freedom we have in this country. But when you open
a forum where freedom of expression is to be practiced, you can expect almost
anything to happen, as it has with Vision 2020.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Pardon me if I state a few obvious things:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>1. Not everyone is interested in every
topic, photo, cartoon, news item, etc that is posted by a long
shot.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>2. Many topics, photos, cartoons, news
items, etc are not specifically about local issues.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>3. Some posts are rancorous, nasty,
etc.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>4. Some people post a lot more than
others.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>5. Some members do not post at all for a
variety of reasons.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>V 2020 has become in part a forum for informing its members
about news items/reports that may affect their perspectives, and may change
their actions on local, national, and global issues. I know from private
emails and conversations that some users appreciate this kind of
information. Not everyone has time to keep up with the many
events/issues that affect their lives. But some people also feel
that the posting of non-local news items is a waste of their time and
bandwidth.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Some postings are very rancorous and nasty. Some of
these nasty posts contain useful information. Some nasty posts are quite
creative. Some V 2020ers also find these
nasty entertaining/interesting in a number of ways. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Do these nasty posts discourage some from participating in
debate? Perhaps. But those who are afraid to offer their opinions
because they fear the responses they may get are perhaps a little too
timid about those opinions. Some politicians/public figures are
also afraid to expose their thinking to their constituents or the
public for a number of reasons. Some people do not like to be shown
they are in error. But all of us make errors. All of us have
limited knowledge. If we were to not do anything where there was a risk of
error, nothing would get done.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>It does not bother me if some people post more than
others. From a practical rhetorical point of view, a number of shorter
posts are more effective and more likely to be read by a greater number of
people than one long post. It doesn't bother me that snippets of our
discussions are posted elsewhere. That is the nature of public
debate. [It is interesting that some of these external postings are made
out of context, leave out crucial statements central to understanding them, or
changed to say something different from the original post -- that is a
reflection on the cowardice and integrity of the reposters, not the original
posters.]</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>If anyone reading this far has ever watched the British
Parliament debate issues, they know that the rancor of V 2020 threads is
several quantum levels politer than the British Parliamentary debates.
You want rancorous debates? Listen to some of the Nixon tapes!
There are thousands of forums on the internet. Vision 2020 is not
different from many in terms of rancor, topics, and lop-sided
participation.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=4><STRONG>In my opinion, restricting
debate/comment/etc, except for trying to limit libelous material, kills ideas,
spontaneity, interest, and makes much debate impotent and
uninteresting.</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT size=5>So the question is: Whither Vision
2020?</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Should the rules be enforced as originally written or should
they be either changed or continued to be ignored and let V 2020 flow
naturally along?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>If the rules are to be enforced as currently
written:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4> 1. Who will enforce
them?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4> 2. Perhaps it is time
to start a new forum, where free-flowing debate/comment, unlimited by topic,
tone, timidity, prudishness, or number of posts is allowed and
encouraged (As I believe was the intention of the founding
fathers/mothers of our country with respect to debating public
issues.)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>If the rules are to be changed, how can this be accomplished
so that the majority of V 2020ers can live with the new rules, and the new
rules still encourage a frank, unlame exchange of ideas, comments,
etc?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Or will the threads on this topic simply die as they
have several times in the past?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4><BR>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<BR><A
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">deco@moscow.com</A><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_____________________________________________________<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>/////////////////////////////////////////////////////<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>