Content-Type: text/html; format=flowed
<html><div style='background-color:'><P class=RTE>Donovan,</P>
<P class=RTE>Since I lack Dan's big brain I am also having trouble following your tax cut logic. You write that the levy they're paying on NOW is set to expire. Once that happens, that bill is gone. They have then agreed to a new tax. Now, if they had voted it down, they wouldn't pay any tax at all. That would be a zero tax as far as levies are concerned. To use your example, they'd go from a $100 tax to a $0.00 tax<BR><BR>Since they've agreed to a new tax, isn't that a tax increase? Haven't they gone from $0.00 to $95, to use your example again?</P>
<DIV class=RTE>If I have this wrong, please type your response slowly, so that I can follow you.</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE> </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>Sunil<BR><BR><BR>>From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com><BR>>To: Dan Carscallen <predator75@moscow.com>, "'Vision 2020'" <vision2020@moscow.com><BR>>Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Fortunately Phil Roderick and his Allies were Wrong<BR>>Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:36:27 -0700 (PDT)<BR>><BR>>Dan, Dan, Dan. . .<BR>><BR>>No. That is not what I am saying, and if you read even<BR>>just the first few lines of the article you would<BR>>understand.<BR>><BR>>The old levy that the residents are still paying on<BR>>NOW is set to expire. This new levy will cost less<BR>>than the one set to expire. So they will be a getting<BR>>tax cut.<BR>><BR>><BR>>Think of it like this, you are paying $100 on an old<BR>>levy, with the levy that passed it will only be
$95.<BR>>That is a tax cut of $5. The old levy wanted you to<BR>>pay $110, which failed. It is pretty simple to figure<BR>>out why this one passed. It had nothing to do with<BR>>people in Moscow hating children and people in<BR>>Boundary county loving children as Wayne concludes.<BR>><BR>>Still hoping you will use your "thinking thingamabob".<BR>><BR>>Donovan J Arnold<BR>><BR></DIV></div></html>