<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>
<P>Donovan,</P>
<P>I think all of us will agree that $95 is less than $100. And all of us will agree that $95 is more than $0.00. You choose to view this as a tax cut. I see it as a tax hike, from $0.00 to $95. Apparently we differ.</P>
<P>I hope my argument did not tax your day and is worthy of your time. <BR><BR>Sunil</P><BR><BR><BR>>From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com><BR>>To: Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam@hotmail.com>, predator75@moscow.com, vision2020@moscow.com<BR>>Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Fortunately Phil Roderick and his Allies were Wrong<BR>>Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:26:24 -0700 (PDT)<BR>><BR>>Sunil,<BR>><BR>>There may be a new tax, but if your taxes overall go<BR>>down that to me is a tax decrease. Now you can argue<BR>>that if your taxes decrease that is a increase because<BR>>of the legal and political garbage behind it, but it<BR>>is still a decrease in your taxes. $95 instead of $100<BR>>is less, not more. A zero tax would be less than $100<BR>>too. But $95 is still less than
$100 according to my<BR>>wallet.<BR>><BR>>If you want to argue that $100 is less than $95<BR>>because $0.00 is less than $95 you are welcome to do<BR>>so but it is not an argument worthy of my time.<BR>><BR>><BR>>Donovan J Arnold<BR></DIV></div></html>