<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Bill, Scott, Joan, [and an answer to Carl's
question],</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Plagiarizing, altering the words of famous
persons:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>1. "Cult Master Wilson: If you had it to do
over, <STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>would you fall in love with yourself
again</FONT></STRONG>?"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4> -- Oscar
Levant</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>2. "Douglas Wilson, the big
turd</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4> Ought never to have
occurred.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4> One can only
wonder</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4> At so grotesque a
blunder."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4> --Edmund Clerihew
Bentley</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>3. "Did you ever think, Wilson, that your
views on things theological</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4> is a lot like pissing
down your leg?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4> It seems hot to you, but
it never does to anyone else."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4> --Lyndon B.
Johnson</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>4. "You really have to get to know Douglas
Wilson in order to dislike him properly."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4> --James T.
Patterson</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>5. "Cult Master Wilson: There but for
the <STRONG><FONT color=#0000ff>grace of God</FONT></STRONG>, <STRONG><FONT
color=#ff0000>goes God</FONT></STRONG>."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4> --Winston
Churchill</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4><BR>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<BR><A
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">deco@moscow.com</A><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>----- Original Message ----- </FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=4>From: "Scott Dredge" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:sdredge@yahoo.com"><FONT size=4>sdredge@yahoo.com</FONT></A><FONT
size=4>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>To: <</FONT><A href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"><FONT
size=4>vision2020@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT size=4>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 11:13 AM</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Subject: [Vision2020] Shoulda, woulda,
coulda</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4><BR></FONT></DIV><FONT size=4>> Doug Wilson is going to
re-release a non-plagiarized<BR>> revision of "Slavery as it was" and he
still insists<BR>> that slavery wasn't bad enough to justify violent<BR>>
abolitionism. What is so important about continuously<BR>> trying
unsuccessfully to hammer home this point? The<BR>> Civil War should not
have taken place? Even if the<BR>> point is conceded it won't change
history. The Civil<BR>> War occurred, slavery was abolished. The
End.<BR>> <BR>> -Scott<BR>> <BR>> From: </FONT><A
href="http://www.worldmagblog.com/blog/"><FONT
size=4>http://www.worldmagblog.com/blog/</FONT></A><BR><FONT size=4>>
====================================================<BR>> Mark Bergin reports
that a revised edition under the<BR>> title Black and Tan will soon be
available, without<BR>> the plagiarized text but keeping the original
thesis<BR>> that slavery wasn't bad enough to justify violent
abolitionism.<BR>> <BR>>
_____________________________________________________<BR>> List services
made available by First Step Internet, <BR>> serving the communities of
the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>>
</FONT><A href="http://www.fsr.net"><FONT
size=4>http://www.fsr.net</FONT></A><FONT
size=4>
<BR>> </FONT><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"><FONT
size=4>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</FONT></A><BR><FONT size=4>>
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ<BR>>
<BR>></FONT></BODY></HTML>