<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><HTML><FONT SIZE=2 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
Mark et. al.<BR>
<BR>
Mark wrote:<BR>
<BR>
"If your were to take it in the simplest of general terms, he talks the<BR>
truth."<BR>
<BR>
If the above quote refers to Doug Wilson's blog that was posted to V2020 about the Atlanta courtroom murders, I don't agree "he talks the truth."<BR>
<BR>
The general drift of Wilson's opinion appears to be that it is "folly" to allow women to serve as guards, that this "folly" is due to the "mind-numbing stubbornness of the<BR>
current PC codes."<BR>
<BR>
I will assume that speed, strength and agility are issues in deciding who should guard prisoners. This would apply equally to women and men. There are many women who can kick 99% of the male population's a**. These women can serve as guards just as competently as many men can, indeed better than many men who still view women as "weak."<BR>
<BR>
A weak male could have been overpowered just as well as a weak female. <BR>
<BR>
Therefore "in the simplest of general terms" Wilson does NOT speak the truth, if the point of his blog entry was to suggest in general terms that it is "folly" to allow women to serve as guards in law enforcement.<BR>
<BR>
Ted Moffett<BR>
</FONT></HTML>