<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><HTML><FONT SIZE=2 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
Dave et. al.<BR>
<BR>
Perhaps I missed the quote by Noam Chomsky, which you declared you were going to supply, that declares Chomsky "endorsed Pol Pot," as YOU phrased it, in 1975 after the fall of Saigon. You have posted voluminously to V2020 since you made the assertion just mentioned, and I have not plowed through every word of your posts, so it is possible I overlooked the Chomsky quote. If so, I apologize in advance.<BR>
<BR>
Some individuals on V2020 engage in the annoying and confusing practice of answering several people at once in one post, with one answer to one individual buried down towards the bottom of the post, with no indication in the subject heading that the subject being answered is addressed after they addressed someone else's post first towards the top.<BR>
<BR>
If I overlooked it, could you repost it please with the proper subject heading indicating the post references our brief (all too brief, considering Chomsky's brilliance and importance as a profound thinker and writer about our modern political/social/economic/media environment) discussion about Noam Chomsky and his alleged endorsement of Pol Pot. <BR>
<BR>
If you have not supplied the quote and cannot, I expect a retraction posted on V2020 of your denigrating dismissal of Chomsky based on a false statement posted by you regarding Chomsky's stand on Pol Pot.<BR>
<BR>
Below read your post where you stated you would supply the alleged quote in discussion, and the post where you first made the assertion Chomsky "endorsed" Pol Pot.<BR>
<BR>
"We" are waiting!<BR>
<BR>
Ted Moffett<BR>
<BR>
Subj: <B>[Vision2020] Re: Noam Chomsky </B> <BR>
Date: 2/11/2005 1:44:40 PM Pacific Standard Time <BR>
From: <A HREF="mailto:dave@davebudge.com">dave@davebudge.com</A> <BR>
To: <A HREF="mailto:Tbertruss@aol.com">Tbertruss@aol.com</A> <BR>
CC: <A HREF="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A>, <A HREF="mailto:auntiestablishment@hotmail.com">auntiestablishment@hotmail.com</A> <BR>
<I>Sent from the Internet (Details)</I> <BR>
<BR>
Ted, I too have read almost everything that Chomsky has ever written. I'll find the quote. He said it in 1975 after the fall of Saigon.<BR>
<BR>
And yes, I detest his logic. He proclaims himself a anarchest, but he is really a communist. He reconstructs both his history and others. He's a fraud and I'll address this in full when I have some time.<BR>
<BR>
db<BR>
<BR>
Subj: <B>Re: [Vision2020] Re: Robin Hood </B> <BR>
Date: 2/11/2005 10:55:30 AM Pacific Standard Time <BR>
From: <A HREF="mailto:dave@davebudge.com">dave@davebudge.com</A> <BR>
To: <A HREF="mailto:auntiestablishment@hotmail.com">auntiestablishment@hotmail.com</A> <BR>
CC: <A HREF="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A> <BR>
<BR>
Thinking about my little dear one. I will remain ever vigilant Joan, but I worry much more about really hard "street literature", full of impurities and historical reconstruction, like Katrina Vanden Houvel at The Nation, Cornell West, and the really scary ghost of Stalin; Noam Chomsky (hey, anybody who ever endorsed Pol Pot qualifies as "really scary.") <BR>
</FONT></HTML>