<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [Vision2020] Rural
wireless?</title></head><body>
<div>I've been a very happy very rural wireless customer of FSR for
the past year. I'll admit to make it work at my remote location
I had to invest in a more powerful and expensive amplified signal
source and antenna than is the norm for Moscow set-ups, but it works
and works well. Line of sight to an FSR antenna is still a
requirement. I hit the one on the Troy water tower from ten miles
away.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>m.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>At 1:49 AM -0500 12/14/04, Tbertruss@aol.com wrote:</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font face="Arial" size="-1">Tom et.
al.<br>
<br>
Yes, well, I, at least, did respond to this development on V2020.
Satellite Internet can be great, but expensive. I suspect First
Steps wireless high speed Internet is cheaper than the satellite
Internet options available.<br>
<br>
As I wrote earlier on V2020:<br>
<br>
I may become a First Step customer if they can provide high speed
wireless Internet beamed to my location in rural Latah County.
Apparently they are working on this.<br>
<br>
Ted Moffett</font></blockquote>
<div><br></div>
</body>
</html>