<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Well this is one article...CNN news just ran a
crawl that said that 73% of those in the military and their families believe
they should stay in Iraq. It is an Anneberg Election survey. You can find
anything to fit into your preset beliefs.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=deco@moscow.com href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco aka W. Fox</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, October 16, 2004 2:29
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Vision2020] 10-16-04 CNN: Poll:
Troops,families question Iraq strategy</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Verdana Ref" size=4>
<H1>Poll: Troops, families question Iraq strategy</H1>
<H3>Most surveyed say Bush sent too few troops; relied too much on Guard</H3>
<P><SPAN class=cnnStoryTime><!-- date -->
<SCRIPT language=JavaScript type=text/javascript>
<!--
        host = new String(location.hostname);
        host = host.toLowerCase();
        if ( host.indexOf("edition.") != -1 ) {
                document.write('Saturday, October 16, 2004 Posted: 1749 GMT (0149 HKT)');
        }else {
                document.write('Saturday, October 16, 2004 Posted: 1:49 PM EDT (1749 GMT)');
        }
//-->
</SCRIPT>
<FONT size=1>Saturday, October 16, 2004 Posted: 1:49 PM EDT (1749
GMT)</FONT></SPAN></P></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Verdana Ref" size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<P><B style="FONT-SIZE: 14px">WASHINGTON (AP) -- Members of the military and
their families say the Bush administration underestimated the number of troops
needed in Iraq and put too much pressure on inadequately trained National
Guard and reserve forces, according to a poll released Saturday.</B></P>
<P>The National Annenberg Election Survey questioned active duty troops in the
regular military and the National Guard and Reserves, as well as family
members of active duty members.</P>
<P>Family members were more critical of the administration's Iraq policy than
those on active duty. </P>
<P>The poll found that 62 percent in the military sample -- 58 percent of
troops and 66 percent of family members -- said the administration
underestimated the number of troops that would be needed to establish peace in
Iraq. (<A
href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/15/military.poll.ap/index.html"><FONT
color=#000099>Part 1 of the Annenberg survey results</FONT></A>)</P>
<P>And 59 percent -- 56 percent of troops and 64 percent of family members --
said too much of a burden has been put on the National Guard and the reserves
when regular forces should have been expanded instead.</P>
<P>This critical view comes from a military group that has a more favorable
view of President Bush, Iraq, the economy and the nation's direction than
Americans in general.</P>
<P>A slight majority of the military and families, 51 percent, said showing
photos of flag-draped coffins being returned to Dover Air Force Base in
Delaware would increase respect for the troops. </P>
<P>That broke down to 47 percent of troops and 56 percent of family members.
Less than 10 percent of the sample said it would decrease respect for the
troops.</P>
<P>The Pentagon has refused to release government photos of the coffins,
saying it has begun enforcing a policy installed in 1991 intended to respect
the privacy of the families of the dead soldiers.</P><A name=1></A><A
name=rv1></A>
<H3>Other military matters</H3>
<P>
<LI>Four in 10 respondents -- 42 percent -- said gays and lesbians should be
allowed to serve openly in the military and 50 percent said no.
<P></P>
<P>Family members narrowly supported the idea by a 51 to 41 percent margin,
while 57 percent of those in the active military opposed it.</P>
<P></P>
<LI>One-fourth said the military draft should be reinstated, three-fourths
said no.
<P></P>
<P>That is about the same level of opposition to the draft in the general
population.</P>
<P></P>
<LI>Six in 10 of the regular military in the sample said they were properly
trained and equipped.
<P></P>
<P></P>
<LI><STRONG><U>Only four in 10 of the Guard members and reservists questioned
said they were properly trained and equipped.</U></STRONG>
<P></P>
<P></P>
<LI>The military sample overwhelmingly approved of the work of women in the
armed forces. Three-fourths said they performed as well as the men they work
with.
<P></P>
<P></P>
<LI>Eight in 10 said soldiers responsible for the Abu Ghraib prison abuse and
their immediate commanders should be punished. Half said higher-level
commanders should be punished and three in 10 said civilians in the Pentagon
should be punished.
<P></P>
<P>The poll of 655 in the active military (both regulars and reserves) and
their families was taken September 22 through October 5 and has a margin of
sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. </P>
<P>Their answers were compared with those of 2,436 adults surveyed September 7
-- October 3 with a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.</P><!--endclickprintinclude--></LI></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_____________________________________________________<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>