[Vision2020] Federal judge dismisses case against Kentucky 'Drone Hunter'

Shawn Clabough shawnc at outtrack.com
Mon Apr 3 22:42:18 PDT 2017

And everywhere within Moscow/Pullman is within 5 miles of an airport (Pullman/Moscow airport, Gritman, Fountains (crop dusting)), so flying must be cleared before you fly.

The FAA has an app to help with flight planning.  https://www.faa.gov/uas/where_to_fly/b4ufly/


From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of Tom Hansen
Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 4:31 PM
To: Kenneth Marcy <kmmos1 at frontier.com>
Cc: Moscow Vision 2020 <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Federal judge dismisses case against Kentucky 'Drone Hunter'

Only over public fields . . .
Seeya 'round town, Moscow, because . . .

"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)

Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho

On Apr 2, 2017, at 3:39 PM, Kenneth Marcy <kmmos1 at frontier.com<mailto:kmmos1 at frontier.com>> wrote:

Federal judge dismisses case against Kentucky 'Drone Hunter'


[cid:image002.jpg at 01D2ACCA.CA93F0B0]

A federal judge in Kentucky has dismissed a lawsuit against William Meredith, a self-proclaimed 'Drone Hunter,' who shot down a $1500 drone that was flying over his property.

The pilot, David Boggs, sued Meredith last year claiming that his drone was flying in legal airspace as determined by the FAA and therefore was not trespassing. A 1946 Supreme Court decision asserted that a property owner's rights extend up to 83 feet in the air.

US District Judge Thomas Russell ruled<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3522488-Merideth-Opinion.html> that federal court is not the proper venue for the lawsuit, noting that the FAA has not enforced any regulations regarding aerial trespassing, nor was the agency a party in the suit. Instead, the Judge said that the lawsuit should be litigated in Kentucky State Court under existing trespassing laws.

Boggs' attorneys have not said whether he will appeal to a higher court – in this case, the 6th US Circuit. In the meantime, drone pilots should probably steer clear of Meredith's property.

Via: Ars Technica<https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/03/judge-rules-in-favor-of-drone-slayer-dismisses-lawsuit-filed-by-pilot/>


[Image removed by sender.]<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>

Virus-free. www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>

List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
         mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20170404/79d52ead/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 181744 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20170404/79d52ead/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 29158 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20170404/79d52ead/image002-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 350 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20170404/79d52ead/image003-0001.jpg>

More information about the Vision2020 mailing list