[Vision2020] 10 Worst States for Women
Kenneth Marcy
kmmos1 at frontier.com
Thu Oct 20 07:44:04 PDT 2016
10 Worst States for Women
*http://tinyurl.com/htpce8z
*
The U.S. could elect the first female president in its history this
November. For many advocates, representation in the nation’s highest
office could lead to meaningful progress for women’s rights, potentially
addressing some of the severe inequalities the nation has yet to overcome.
These issues include a gender pay gap, a lack of flexibility in the
workplace during pregnancy and early motherhood, and, indeed, a lack of
women holding positions of political influence. While some states have
made progress, a number of states are far behind in closing the earnings
gap, electing women to office, funding pre-K programs, and passing laws
that allow women to stay in the workforce when they have children,
should they so choose. 24/7 Wall St. reviewed and ranked the 50 states
based on their favorability to women. These are the 10 worst states for
women.
Perhaps the most egregious component of gender inequality in the U.S. is
the wage gap. Though the severity of the wage gap varies by state,
nationwide, the typical woman working full time earns 80 cents for every
dollar a man earns. No state has a larger gap than Wyoming, however,
where women earn roughly 64 cents for every dollar. With lower incomes,
women are also far more likely to live in poverty than men.The U.S.
could elect the first female president in its history this November. For
many advocates, representation in the nation’s highest office could lead
to meaningful progress for women’s rights, potentially addressing some
of the severe inequalities the nation has yet to overcome.
These issues include a gender pay gap, a lack of flexibility in the
workplace during pregnancy and early motherhood, and, indeed, a lack of
women holding positions of political influence. While some states have
made progress, a number of states are far behind in closing the earnings
gap, electing women to office, funding pre-K programs, and passing laws
that allow women to stay in the workforce when they have children,
should they so choose. 24/7 Wall St. reviewed and ranked the 50 states
based on their favorability to women. These are the 10 worst states for
women.
Perhaps the most egregious component of gender inequality in the U.S. is
the wage gap. Though the severity of the wage gap varies by state,
nationwide, the typical woman working full time earns 80 cents for every
dollar a man earns. No state has a larger gap than Wyoming, however,
where women earn roughly 64 cents for every dollar. With lower incomes,
women are also far more likely to live in poverty than men.
In an interview with 24/7 Wall St., Julie Anderson, a research associate
at the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, explained why the wage gap
exists. According to Anderson, “the largest contributor to the wage gap
is occupational segregation.” Men are more likely to be hired in higher
paying, managerial roles than women. Though the share ranges from state
to state, nationwide, fewer than 40% of management positions are held by
women.
According to Anderson, women are also far more likely than men to work
in low wage, part-time jobs. Since the wage gap only measures the
incomes of men and women working full time, the problem is even more
pronounced than the data indicates.
Maternity, Anderson explained, can lead to lower overall incomes for
women, particularly as raising a child can often lead women to exit the
workforce for good. “If a family has to choose between someone being
fully engaged in work and someone being a caregiver, the logical choice
is the one who earns less will be the one to back off, and in most cases
that will be the woman in the family.”
While the Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993 mandates that most working
mothers must be allowed 12 weeks maternity leave, a number of states
have additional policies in place both for public employees and the
private sector workforce. Many states extend the minimum number of
weeks, allow women to use sick days to cover pre- and post-natal care,
and, in some cases, mandate paid leave for both mothers and fathers.
Another state policy that has shown to be advantageous to young mothers
is a taxpayer-funded pre-Kindergarten program. Besides being
instrumental in childhood development, pre-K programs give parents the
opportunity to leave their children somewhere safe during the day.
Anderson explained that as mothers are more often tasked with the
responsibility of watching young children, this means women avoid the
expenses of private daycare, and also will have an easier time returning
to the workforce. Eight states have no taxpayer-funded pre-K, and
partially as a result rank among the worst for women in the country.
Female representation in government is also an important aspect of
gender equality, and elected government positions are held primarily by
men. Nearly half of all states have never had a female governor and
women comprise an average of less than 25% of state legislatures.
According to Anderson, this is problematic both because it may
discourage women from running for elected office and because male
politicians are less likely to implement reform related to gender
equality. Anderson explained that while women are less likely to run for
office, when they do, they tend win at the same rates as men.
*http://tinyurl.com/htpce8z*
*3. Idaho *
*> Female earnings as pct. of male:* 73.5% (8th lowest)
*> Pct. mgmt. jobs held by women:* 38.8% (19th lowest)
*> Pct. 3-4 yr. olds enrolled in state pre-K:* 0% (the lowest)
*> Pct. legislative seats held by women:* 27.6% (17th highest)
The earnings gap between men and women in Idaho is one of the worst in
the country. The typical male in the state working full time earns
$43,264, while the typical working female earns only $31,808, the lowest
median salary of any state except Mississippi.
In addition to earning less, women are underrepresented in public
office. All four of the state’s congressional delegates are men and a
woman has never been elected governor of Idaho.
*Ken*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20161020/1a2dfa9f/attachment.html>
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list