[Vision2020] Idaho football news
Kenneth Marcy
kmmos1 at frontier.com
Fri Jan 8 04:13:09 PST 2016
University of Idaho Facing Difficult Situation Soon
By Damien Alambra @iwasrun on Jan 7, 2016, 3:58p
http://www.obnug.com/2016/1/7/10733478/university-of-idaho-facing-difficult-situation-soon
Things looking dire for the University of Idaho.
Our friend Dave Southorn, of the Idaho Statesman, met with UI President
Chuck Staben today. In the talk, the subject of Idaho's current
football-only membership in the Sun Belt Conference was addressed and
Staben's feelings regarding the football program's future. While
conference realignment has been somewhat of a frustrating topic for
Boise State Broncos
<http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/teams/boise-st-broncos>
fans, it is massive concern for the likes of Idaho (and New Mexico State
University).
Per Southorn's Twitter feed:
Met with Idaho president Chuck Staben today...said no decision on
Vandal FB future. Hopes for Sun Belt renewal, considering other options.
— Dave Southorn (@IDS_Southorn) January 7, 2016
<https://twitter.com/IDS_Southorn/status/685218923722113024>
You may, or may not, remember that Idaho's football-only invitation was
actually on a trial basis. From the Idaho student newspaper, The
Argonaut <http://www.uiargonaut.com/2015/09/24/sun-belt-days-numbered/>:
After a year of independence, both schools joined the Sun Belt as
football-only members on a four-year contract. After two years, the
other Sun Belt schools will vote to either extend the Vandals’ and
Aggies’ membership, or to kick them out while letting them play one
final year during the 2016-17 season.
To which, that crucial vote is coming up.
Idaho would be first school to go from FBS to FCS if Sun Belt
decides not to extend- league will vote during conference BB tourney
(Mar. 10)
— Dave Southorn (@IDS_Southorn) January 7, 2016
<https://twitter.com/IDS_Southorn/status/685219600934375425>
Back in August, the Sun Belt invited Coastal Carolina
<http://sunbeltsports.org/news/2015/9/1/GENERAL_0901151041.aspx> to the
conference to balance out the other sports that were unbalanced due to
Idaho (and New Mexico State's) inclusion. Coastal Carolina will also be
moving their football program up to the FBS level. The goal of the
eventual Coastal Carolina inclusion in football would also bump them to
twelve. That move would be to qualify for the current NCAA rule of
having a minimum of twelve teams to get a conference championship game.
However that requirement has been up in the air since the Big XII does
not necessarily /want/ to expand to match their namesake.
Per Benson, regarding the potential deregulation
<http://www.theadvertiser.com/story/sports/college/ul/2015/08/28/sbc-schools-vote-extending-membership-invitation/71349570/>:
"As we now go forward, and expecting that the NCAA will roll back
the policy that requires 12 teams to do a conference football
championship game," Benson said, "we are no longer driven by a
football championship game when it comes to our future membership.
We now need to focus on what is in the best interest of our other
sports."
In theory, this would be bad news for the Idaho football program. A
conference that is not beholden to a minimum number of teams for
football could allow the Sun Belt to drop either Idaho, NMSU, or both.
But, as with everything NCAA-related things, nothing necessarily goes
easy
<http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/big-ten-issues-amendment-to-block-deregulation-of-conference-championships-220524302.html>.
The Big Ten Conference filed a last-minute amendment in November
that could prevent the Big 12 from having a conference championship
game.
Though it looks as if the status quo for divisions--and champions--will
remain as they are currently, Idaho's outlook still is murky. Idaho will
be looking toward March 10th with bated breath as their football fate
will be in the hands of (mostly) southern schools looking to do what is
"best."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20160108/94a26de8/attachment.html>
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list