[Vision2020] limiting welfare recipients

[Debi Smith]

Tennessee’s first year of drug testing welfare recipients uncovered drug 
use by less than 0.2 percent of all applicants for the state’s public 
assistance system.

The state implemented the testing regime in the summer of 2014, adding 
three questions about narcotics use to the application form for aid. 
Anyone who answers “yes” to any of the three drug questions must take a 
urine test or have their application thrown away immediately. Anyone who 
fails a urine test must complete drug treatment and pass a second test, 
or have their benefits cut off for six months.

In total, just 1.6 percent of the 28,559 people 
<http://wmot.org/post/tenn-completes-first-year-welfare-drug-testing#stream/0> 
who applied for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits 
in the first year of testing answered one of the three screening 
questions positively. Out of the 468 people who peed in a state-funded 
cup, 11.7 percent flunked the test.

With 55 people testing positive for drugs out of an applicant pool of 
nearly 30,000, Tennessee’s testing system uncovered that a whopping 0.19 
percent of those who applied for aid were drug users. Ultimately, 32 
applicants were denied benefits for failing to complete the state’s 
mandatory drug rehab process for those who test positive.

Tennessee officials say the year of testing cost $11,000, or $200 per 
failed drug test. But that only accounts for what the state paid to the 
outside vendor who conducted the actual tests, excluding staff hours 
that went into processing the new application materials and managing the 
logistics of testing those who gave an affirmative answer to a screening 
question.

Seven states that drug test welfare recipients have now spent about $1 
million on the tests, according to previous ThinkProgress research 
<http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2015/02/26/3624447/tanf-drug-testing-states/>. 
Each state has found drug usage rates among welfare applicants to be far 
below the national average of 9.4 percent for all Americans.

All of these states use a screening questionnaire similar to 
Tennessee’s, in part because wholesale testing of all applicants has 
been ruled unconstitutional. The ratio of failed tests among those who 
actually submit a urine sample is of course higher, but the fact remains 
that the systems these states erected to root out the imaginary scourge 
of welfare drug use 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/06/05/states-want-drug-tests-for-welfare-recipients-thats-a-terrible-idea/> 
have produced vanishingly small percentages of drug use among those who 
seek public assistance.

The drug screenings are widely criticized among both civil liberties 
advocates and drug abuse experts. Canada’s Centre for Addiction and 
Mental Health warns the tests “further entrench the stigma 
<http://www.camh.ca/en/hospital/about_camh/influencing_public_policy/public_policy_submissions/Pages/manddrugtesting.aspx> 
which erroneously links drug addiction with economic need” and points 
out that 70 percent of drug users are employed. The American Civil 
Liberties Union has lodged legal complaints about the policies, but also 
pointed out that their premise is flawed because welfare recipients are 
no likelier than other Americans 
<https://www.aclu.org/drug-testing-public-assistance-recipients-condition-eligibility?redirect=drug-law-reform/drug-testing-public-assistance-recipients-condition-eligibility> 
to use drugs.

There’s a moralizing strain to the idea that people seeking the public’s 
help should first have their choices and behavior audited. Requiring the 
poor to jump through such hoops is persistently popular with voters 
<http://www.vice.com/read/most-welfare-recipients-dont-use-drugs-so-why-do-states-keep-drug-testing-them-1229>. 
But the conceit underlying the tests ignores the realities of poverty 
<http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/12/18/3081791/welfare-recipient-spending/>. 
Low-income families spend a far greater percentage of their meager 
incomes on necessities, and less on luxuries of all kinds, than do 
wealthier families.

/This article originally stated that 1.9 percent of all applicants 
failed a drug test. In fact 0.19 percent of all applicants failed a test./

*Tags*

  * Drugs <http://thinkprogress.org/tag/drugs/>
  * Poverty <http://thinkprogress.org/tag/poverty/>
  * Tennessee <http://thinkprogress.org/tag/tennessee/>
  * Welfare <http://thinkprogress.org/tag/welfare/>

Share55,286 
<https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2Feconomy%2F2015%2F10%2F07%2F3710190%2Ftennessee-welfare-drug-tests-year-one%2F>
Tweet977 
<https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3A%2F%2Fthkpr.gs%2F3710190&via=thinkprogress&related=thinkprogress&text=Tennessee%E2%80%99s+First+Year+Of+Drug+Testing+Welfare+Applicants+Didn%E2%80%99t+Go+Very+Well>
Comment

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20151008/3e4e82b4/attachment.html>