[Vision2020] All evidence released by St. Louis County Grand Jury . . .

Sunil sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
Thu Nov 27 09:16:28 PST 2014


Scott,

You're still missing the central point: The state always puts on its strongest evidence, either before a grand jury or at a preliminary hearing. These are probable cause hearings. The question is, 'Is there probable 
cause that the individual committed this crime?' It's a low threshold, 
51%, and defenses AREN'T relevant at this stage. It's almost unheard of for the state to put  on exculpatory evidence; that's not its role. 

This prosecutor did not do that. Instead he put on evidence that would cloud the case. No, I don't think this heralds a new era of prosecutorial enlightenment. Have you looked at this prosecutor's response to this killing from the beginning? The outcome is no surprise when  reviewed in that context.

It's naive to think that this was a truth-seeking mission. It was not, and it arrived at the pre-ordained outcome. How often do you see cops prosecuted by the prosecutors they work with regularly?

Sunil

From: scooterd408 at hotmail.com
To: sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] All evidence released by St. Louis County Grand Jury . . .
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:40:24 -0700




You know what Sunil?  You're right.  I was expecting everyone involved to do their job to the best of their ability for the integrity of the system.  Maybe a'la the Trayvon Martin / George Zimmerman case, a bulldog of a special prosecutor should have been assigned with a direct order to put forth the strongest prosecution case possible regardless of whether he or she was handed down an indictment from a grand jury.  Since the anger in the black community and the surrounding media frenzy centers around 'white cop kills black kid for the crime of jaywalking', it seems to me the best way of directly addressing this aspect would be for the prosecutor to put forth a clear and convincing case that this was a racially motivated killing by a white officer with a patterned, systematic, and provable history of racial hatred, discrimination, and harassment of blacks coupled with verifiable instances that he brutalized black suspects.

Absent that, we have 1) videotaped evidence of a victim who is shown displaying two separate acts of aggression toward another person shortly before his fatal encounter with an armed law enforcement officer, 2) evidence and witness testimony of a violent altercation between the victim outside of the police car and the officer inside the police car whereby the officer initially fires his weapon, 3) the officer exiting his vehicle and unleashing a hail of gunfire until he has emptied his service revolver.  

Out of this the jury is tasked with determining criminal intent, justifiable shooting, other, or split decision (aka hung jury).

From: sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:10:46 -0800
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] All evidence released by St. Louis County	Grand	Jury .	. .




Scott,

If the prosecutor wanted an indictment he'd have it. You're confusing this for a neutral process. He got the outcome he wanted with the grand jury for cover. 

Sunil

From: scooterd408 at hotmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:31:53 -0800
To: moscowcares at moscow.com
CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] All evidence released by St. Louis County Grand	Jury .	. .

Is there any smoking gun?

On Nov 26, 2014, at 6:21 PM, Moscow Cares <moscowcares at moscow.com> wrote:

. . . accessible below.
Courtesy of St. Louis Public Radio at:
http://apps.stlpublicradio.org/ferguson-project/evidence.html

Seeya 'round town, Moscow, because . . .
"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)http://www.MoscowCares.com  Tom HansenMoscow, Idaho
=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
======================================================= 		 	   		  

=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
======================================================= 		 	   		   		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20141127/d60cc342/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list