[Vision2020] Hobby Lobby

[lfalen]

Religious freedom comes in as--Does the company have the right to decline paying for coverage that they have a religious objection to? That is the question that the Supreme Court will decide.
Roger


-----Original Message-----
From: "Scott Dredge" <scooterd408 at hotmail.com>
To: lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>, viz <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Date: 03/26/14 21:12
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Hobby Lobby

If 'religious freedom' equates to an employer exerting control over a woman's insurance coverage concerning birth control and emergency contraception, then agree with your assessment.  Note that Hobby Lobby's business is arts and crafts.  It is not a religious organization.  It should not be allowed to meddle with insurance line items of their female employees.  It's cases like this that bolster a system of 'single payer'.


Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:32:56 -0700
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
From: lfalen at turbonet.com
Subject: [Vision2020] Hobby Lobby

 Scott pretty well nailed it on how the vote will go, however everyone is a little off on what the case is about. Abortion is at the root of the problem, but the case itself is about religious freedom.


Roger


 

======================================================= List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. http://www.fsr.net mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com =======================================================
 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20140327/0309a07d/attachment.html>