[Vision2020] Swindles and Spam, Lurking in Your Search Results
Art Deco
art.deco.studios at gmail.com
Thu May 23 19:24:24 PDT 2013
[image: The New York Times] <http://www.nytimes.com/>
------------------------------
May 22, 2013
Swindles and Spam, Lurking in Your Search Results By AZADEH ENSHA
Most of our ventures onto the Web still begin with a search — a fact
readily exploited by spammers and swindlers who rely on excessive use of
keywords, link exchanging and other manipulation techniques to push their
content higher in the list of search results, hoping you will click on
them.
Though the major search engines discourage such deception, that hasn’t
stopped companies from
engaging<http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/13/business/13search.html>in
such practices — and fooling users in the process.
Even someone with decades of search expertise, like Duane Forrester, a
senior product manager at Bing, can fall victim to a Web scam.
“I was looking to buy a new lens for a digital camera, and I found a store
that had one for $200 less than everyone else,” Mr. Forrester said. “Turns
out the store was a fly-by-night shop out of the U.K. that sold broken
products. I called the company and got my refund, but I still fell into the
pothole.”
Millions of “dirty” sites litter the Web. The Web security firm Blue Coat
Systems concluded in its 2012 security report that search engines topped
the list of spam entry points, before e-mail and other sources. At a
minimum, off-topic spam results are a nuisance. More perniciously, spammers
can infect computers with malware and phish for sensitive personal data
like credit card information. Here are some ways to avoid search spam.
*LEARN TO SPOT SPAM* Mastering the art of smarter
searching<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/25/technology/personaltech/tips-to-search-smarter-and-faster.html>won’t
always shield you from getting spammed. That is why, as a first step,
you should look before you click.
Don’t assume that the top results are the most useful or even the safest.
Look at the letters that follow the period at the end of a Web address.
Top-level domains like .com and .info, as well as top-level country code
domains like .fr (for France) are prime targets for spammers.
One reason is that spammers know that spelling mistakes happen. It’s common
to forget the “o” in a dot-com search, for instance. So if you want a site
that ends in .com, but mistakenly type in .cm (the country code for
Cameroon), you might get spam instead of the page you wanted.
Many sites will also take advantage of Web address shorteners like Bitly to
direct you to an unsavory source. So be cautious about clicking those
truncated URLs as well.
Both Google and Bing tip searchers off to potentially unsafe sites,
wherever possible. If a search engine warns you that a site is potentially
unsafe, browse at your own risk. And as Mr. Forrester’s tale shows, a site
that is offering discounts that appear too good to be true may indeed be
offering deals too good to be true.
In addition, before making any purchase on a lesser-known site, take a look
around. Do you see a listed address? If so, map it. Look for the e-mail
address. If your only contact option is a Gmail or Yahoo account, something
may be awry.
A site’s language, too, may be a giveaway, especially when you are
conducting a local search.
Flagrant grammar and spelling errors may signal that the owner is based
elsewhere. And if you spot the term “free” scrawled across a Web site,
proceed with caution.
*SOME SITES ARE RISKIER* It is important to know what separates a potential
spam site from a harmless one. The difference may be counterintuitive. For
example, pornography domains may be safer to browse than some mainstream
content. According to Cisco’s 2013
annual<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/vpndevc/annual_security_report.html>security
report, “online advertisements are 182 times more likely to
deliver malicious content than pornographic sites.”
Matt Cutts, who heads the Web spam team at Google, said this was because
pornography sites were well monitored. “People who run porn sites are
tech-savvy, and they pay a lot of attention to visitors, so they notice
unusual things quickly,” he said.
Though a search result may be safe, it may not be useful. A prime example
is Yahoo Answers. The community-driven site consistently ranks high across
the major engines on question-related queries. But the quality of its
answers varies greatly and the site is often more useful for a chuckle than
legitimate insight. Learn to spot and selectively skip these sites.
Similarly, instructional sites like eHow may place a higher premium on
quantity over quality content, so you might not find exactly what you are
searching for there.
Be wary of Web pages that oversell you on their supposed legitimacy. One
Better Business Bureau logo is fine. A series of logos promoting a site’s
professionalism or expertise is a red flag.
Almost anyone with rudimentary Photoshop skills can create and attach fake
logos on to a site. You can crosscheck any awards by going to the source.
It is also a good idea to check whether a Web site is certified. The
Department of Homeland Security offers more
information<http://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/tips/ST05-010>on this.
*SOME SEARCHES ATTRACT SPAM* Some searches are more enticing to spammers
than others. Credit report queries are a top target. Remember, there are
only three major national credit agencies. If you are using an outside
party to check credit reports, do so carefully.
Be extra cautious when conducting travel and insurance searches. Some sites
create travel tips for the express purpose of drawing you into their hotel
or other travel-related business. It is best to seek out travel information
from a more trusted site.
Search results for lyrics, videos and screen savers also pose an increased
risk. For example, pages with downloadable content, like those offering
ring tones, provide an enticing built-in audience for spammers because the
user is actively looking to install software.
When you search also matters. Spammers tend to come out in force on Cyber
Monday and other big shopping periods.
Nor is spam limited to text. A site with many broken image links may be
designed that way intentionally. It is easier to sell an outdated model if
customers don’t see the product. Use a reverse image search service
likeTinEye<http://www.tineye.com/>to find out if an image has been
pulled from another site.
*BEEF UP YOUR BROWSER* As the search leader, Google is targeted more than
any other engine. Chrome users can install a spam
extension<https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/spam-blocker-for-google-s/mmnbhiajmalgdjlojjamonklladcijim?hl=en>that
lets users identify potential spam sites and block them from their
search results by clicking on a “spam” text link next to each result.
You can also change your Google ad
settings<http://www.google.com/settings/ads/onweb/>and opt out of the
company’s advertising
cookies <http://www.google.com/settings/ads/plugin/>.
*SEEK OUT CUSTOM ENGINES* Another way to avoid getting spam — and to get
more relevant results — is to go directly to a specialized search engine,
where the results are already filtered for your query.
You could go to Google Books for book searches and know you will more
likely get book results for “The Great Gatsby,” say, and not offers for
“Gatsby” T-shirts. There are also engines like Science.gov and
Scirus<http://www.scirus.com/>— both useful for science-related
queries. Another valuable specialized
engine is iSEEK Education <http://education.iseek.com/iseek/home.page>.
Lastly, you can use the image service Picsearch
<http://www.picsearch.com/>to filter photo searches.
--
Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
art.deco.studios at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130523/8e0e0b4d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list