[Vision2020] Rand Paul
Sunil Ramalingam
sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 7 05:59:40 PST 2013
Tom,
Are you kidding me? Okay, here's one link:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/05/16856963-american-drone-deaths-highlight-controversy?lite
As the article points out, we also killed Al Awlaki's 16 year old son in a separate attack.
But this isn't the first time I've brought this up here; you should hardly be in the dark about it.
Sunil
CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
From: thansen at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Rand Paul
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 05:52:49 -0800
To: sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
Perhaps, Sunil, you should provide evidence that the Obama administration is responsible for killing US citizens, or a US citizen, in the absence of due process.
I suggest this because I am not the one making an allegation. You are.
Here is the letter sent from Attorney General Eric Holder to Rand Paul (dated March 4, 2013 - less than 72 hours ago).
http://paul.senate.gov/files/documents/BrennanHolderResponse.pdf
Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .
"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)http://www.MoscowCares.com Tom HansenMoscow, Idaho
"There's room at the top they are telling you still But first you must learn how to smile as you kill If you want to be like the folks on the hill."
- John Lennon
On Mar 7, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com> wrote:
You have not proven your point. This is an administration that does not reveal information. If or when they kill a citizen without due process, they will not provide all the reasons or evidence they claim supports them. They will just tell us they needed to do it, and that will be it. They won't allow their decisions to be challenged. They regularly don't even acknowledge that drone attacks outside the US have even occurred.
Sunil
CC: sunilramalingam at hotmail.com; vision2020 at moscow.com
From: thansen at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Rand Paul
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 05:16:05 -0800
To: philosopher.joe at gmail.com
<215407_10151331874981275_1548944263_n.png>Like I've said before . . .
Paranoia, self-destroya.
Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .
"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)http://www.MoscowCares.com Tom HansenMoscow, Idaho
"There's room at the top they are telling you still But first you must learn how to smile as you kill If you want to be like the folks on the hill."
- John Lennon
On Mar 7, 2013, at 5:01 AM, Joe Campbell <philosopher.joe at gmail.com> wrote:
I'm suspicious of R Paul. Why did he make it simply a domestic concern? What exactly is the number of people that we've killed in the US with drones? Say what you wish but the problem that Rand actually talked about is not a pressing issue at the time (not as pressing as the economy for instance) IMO. The timing is curious.
No one who has posted on the thread is in favor of the current drone policy. When it comes to drones, my concern has more to do with the death of innocents than with the issue of rights but we've killed far more innocents without drones than with them. I didn't here R Paul talk about that.
I don't see how the innocent folks who died in the initial Iraq invasion are merely an acceptable cost of war but when an innocent dies from a drone intended for a terrorist, that is atrocious. To me the Iraq war was and is one horrible mistake and drones are just part of that.
Given the timing and the content of the speech, R Paul's comments strike me as purely political.
On Mar 6, 2013, at 10:23 PM, Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com> wrote:
I'm with Paul R and R Paul on this. Like Paul R, when I read Sen. Paul's statement, my regret was that he limits his concern to US citizens on US soil. We should be concerned about these atrocities wherever they occur. This, and his expansion of the security state and executive power, and his refusal to prosecute torturers (but his willingness to prosecute those who expose it) led me to vote for Jill Stein in the last election. That was the first time since 1980, when I could first vote, that I didn't vote for the Democratic Party candidate. And I'm not coming back while the Democrats embrace and take Bush-Cheney policies to heart.
Sunil
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 18:43:14 -0800
From: godshatter at yahoo.com
To: donaldrose at cpcinternet.com
CC: Vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Rand Paul
"Showboating", huh? Whatever.
The vast amount of drone strikes overseas have either been against
people on their kill list going about their day, not currently
involved in a violent attack, or they have been against people
they can't identify but that they are reasonably sure are
terrorists because of their associations. Again, not taking them
out while they are actively engaged in combat, just assassinating
them wherever they happen to find them, doing whatever they happen
to be doing at that moment. Doing the dishes, blam, dead, along
with who knows how many people nearby. No due process, no vetting
of evidence, no jury of their peers, no idea even what criteria
our President uses to determine who gets to die that day.
Nobody I've seen is saying that we can't use drones, even on
American soil, against people actively involved in combat. The
problem is that that isn't what they are being used for.
If you want to wish this away as some kind of stunt because he's a
Paul or because he's a Republican or because you don't like his
haircut, then you're part of the problem. Our President is out of
control with these assassinations, and our police departments are
out of control in their militarization. Drop the damned Us vs.
Them crap, please.
Paul
On 03/06/2013 06:06 PM, Rosemary Huskey wrote:
Should
there be a disclaimer with this “purist’s” showboating?
Where does shooting someone in self-defense, or those
occasions when law enforcement officers are forced by a
critically dangerous situation (for example a gun battle)
to shoot to kill come into this equation? I am sure that
Rand will zoon right to the top of the list of right wing
nutbags with this stunt.
Rose
From:
vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
[mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of
Paul Rumelhart
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 5:55 PM
To: Vision 2020
Subject: [Vision2020] Rand Paul
I found this on Google+, I didn't make it
and I don't claim it.
I don't agree with this guy on everything by any means and I
wish he'd left out the "on American soil" part, but I am
behind him on this.
<ATT00001>
Paul
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
==============================================================================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130307/af911bd1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list