[Vision2020] Huh? Say WHAT!?

[Tom Hansen]

Speaking of sheep . . .



Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .

"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)
http://www.MoscowCares.com
  
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho

"There's room at the top they are telling you still 
But first you must learn how to smile as you kill 
If you want to be like the folks on the hill."

- John Lennon
 

On Mar 1, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com> wrote:

> I guess I'm coming at this from a more mathematical perspective.
> 
> If it's OK for A to marry B, and it's OK for A to marry C, and it's OK for B to marry C, then why not let A marry B and C if all parties agree to the arrangement?  That argument now works when it didn't before because all gender combinations are now legal.  Before, if A was male and B and C were female, it wouldn't have been legal for B to marry C.  Now it is, so that seems to me to open the door for more complicated relationship combinations.
> 
> Also, to be clear, I'm talking about A, B, and C as being members of the set of people who are able to consent to marriage.  Thus, tweens are right out.  Sheep, too, in case anyone wanted to go there.  I see no reason why the government should try to protect against 3+ party marriages.
> 
> Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130301/8e8d7f7a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 160068 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130301/8e8d7f7a/attachment-0001.jpeg>