[Vision2020] NRA's New Ad: "Obama is an Elitist Hypocrite"

[Gary Crabtree]

So why are  these "fashion accessories" effective and necessary tools when
dealing with chief exec. kiddies and not those of the great unwashed? Why
is a tool useful in one application and not the other?

g

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Kenneth Marcy <kmmos1 at frontier.com> wrote:

> On 1/16/2013 8:16 AM, Gary Crabtree wrote:
>
>> So, please explain why if guns are so totally ineffective in protecting
>> children in schools across the country they suddenly become mandatory for
>> protecting the children of the democrat elite?
>>
>
> A little more precision would be useful here.  In this case "children of
> the democrat elite" does not refer to children of millions of families
> across the country who might fit that description, but rather the children
> of the President of the United States, the incumbent of which office
> happens to be one of the more hated individuals among various peoples
> around the world (not to mention in this country).  It matters not what the
> President's political affiliations may be; his children still receive
> Secret Service protection. Considering the variety and range of the efforts
> to protect the President and his family, one might consider that firearms
> are closer to being fashion accessories for the officers rather than the
> actual power that they assert.
>
>
> Ken
>
> ==============================**=========================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> ==============================**=========================
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130116/8121cc2e/attachment.html>