[Vision2020] Fwd: Debate tonight
Art Deco
art.deco.studios at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 14:47:38 PST 2013
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joe Campbell <philosopher.joe at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Debate tonight
To: "daniel at foucachon.com" <daniel at foucachon.com>
Cc: "vision2020 at moscow.com" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Obviously I missed the "debate"! Here are a few reasons why some don't
consider this a real debate. I'm not endorsing all of these reasons,
just saying that they are reasonable considerations that folks will
raise.
First, the sublime: Does reason ever play a role in deciding
fundamental beliefs? Aren't they settled by irrational forces? After
all, how many will walk away from the debate tonight with a new point
of view?
Second, isn't the real debate: Should Doug Wilson decide who (among
the competent, freely choosing, adults) Andrew Sullivan can marry, or
should we leave the decision up to Andrew Sullivan? Suppose we flipped
the names and asked: Should Sullivan decide who (among the competent,
freely choosing, adults) Wilson can marry, or should we leave the
decision up to Wilson? I’m pretty sure about Wilson’s answer to this
last question! Really, this is NOT a debatable issue. The answer is
pretty clear if you just turn the question back on yourself. You
should decide; and so should I; and so should Sullivan. The State
should worry about the debt.
Third, there is this analogy. One might be embarrassed to learn that
one of her relatives went to a debate in the 1880s entitled “Is
Emancipation Good for Society?” From our perspective, it is difficult
to imagine how someone might consider slavery to be a debatable topic.
In any event, one might not want to be THAT relative: the one who
thought that gay marriage was even debatable. I confess, I don't want
to be THAT relative.
Keep in mind we're not talking about morality here. We're talking
about the law. What kinds of general restrictions of behavior can we
place on all people, respecting them as persons, with various creeds,
opinions, and personal beliefs? Following an earlier sentiment
expressed by Mr. Keim, I say the fewer the better! Once you even
consider telling folks who they should marry, you violate this simple
principle.
Best, Joe
On Feb 27, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Daniel Foucachon <daniel at foucachon.com> wrote:
Rosemary,
I can't take questions since I will be behind a camera, as well as
directing the other 4 cameras, but perhaps someone else on this list
could bring forward your question. Ideally the question would be
stated more concisely. Would shortening it to this take away from your
question?: "Why have you concentrated your efforts on the topic of
homosexuality and sexual issues? Are there not more important topics
to address?"
Good question!
I'm off to prep some cameras,
-Daniel
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:38 PM, <vision2020-request at moscow.com> wrote:
>
> Send Vision2020 mailing list submissions to
> vision2020 at moscow.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/vision2020
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> vision2020-request at moscow.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> vision2020-owner at moscow.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Vision2020 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Debate tonight (Rosemary Huskey)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:37:54 -0800
> From: "Rosemary Huskey" <donaldrose at cpcinternet.com>
> To: "'Daniel Foucachon'" <foucachon at gmail.com>,
> <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Debate tonight
> Message-ID: <016901ce1532$b842d9a0$28c88ce0$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
>
> Actually I am a bit under the weather today, and I?m not sure my headache
would improve after an evening with Doug and the boys, but it is my hope
that you might consider carrying my question forward to me and asking it
for me.
>
>
>
> ?Why are you (meaning Doug Wilson) fixated on homosexuality? There are
many acts/moral failings/crimes that are common not only to your faith
community but in our larger community as well. Pedophilia, alcohol abuse,
domestic violence, adultery, thievery, hypocrisy, and pride all spring
instantly to mind. These are topics that Jesus addressed frequently.
However, he never addressed homosexuality. I would be the last person to
equate Jesus with you (Doug) and to your credit so would you) but given the
pressing problems mentioned above, I wonder why you (Doug) seem hooked on
the topic of sexual orientation? You sneering and hateful use of
pejorative terms ? I won?t repeat them - causes me to wonder about the
source of your interest. What?s the deal? How ?bout a Campus program
with an agenda of imploring your audience to treat all GLBT people with
respect and kindness instead of sneering nastiness? Will you agree to stop
using Beavis and Butthead offensive, childish !
> terms when talking about sexual orientation??
>
>
>
> And, secondarily: Have you been advising CJ Mahaney and the crackpots at
Sovereign Grace Ministry <
http://thewartburgwatch.com/2013/02/26/breaking-news-sgm-flings-it-an-attempt-to-get-a-dismissal/>
on how to spin their way out of charges that they protect pedophiles? It
sure looks like it.
>
>
>
> As Ever,
>
>
>
> Rose Huskey
>
>
>
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of Daniel Foucachon
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:49 AM
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: [Vision2020] Debate tonight
>
>
>
> I hope some of you are planning on attending the debate tonight between
Andrew Sullivan and Doug Wilson. Peter Hitchens (brother of the late
Christopher Hitchens) is moderating.
>
>
>
> 7:30 at SUB. There will be a 45 min public QA, and with two lines: 1 for
questions for Doug Wilson, one for Andrew Sullivan. I specify this because
someone (I think Tom Hansen) was sure that the QA would somehow be rigged.
Come, bring your questions!
>
> Topic: Is Homosexual Marriage Good for Society?
>
>
>
> Promo video: http://youtu.be/aui5APspcI8
>
>
>
> -Daniel
>
> Sent from iPhone
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2013, at 11:39, vision2020-request at moscow.com wrote:
>
> Send Vision2020 mailing list submissions to
> vision2020 at moscow.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/vision2020
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> vision2020-request at moscow.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> vision2020-owner at moscow.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Vision2020 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Wayne Krauss (Saundra Lund)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:39:22 -0800
> From: "Saundra Lund" <v2020 at ssl1.fastmail.fm>
> To: "'Darrell Keim'" <keim153 at gmail.com>, "'Art Deco'"
> <art.deco.studios at gmail.com>
> Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Wayne Krauss
> Message-ID: <015801ce1522$2540fb10$6fc2f130$@ssl1.fastmail.fm>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Sorry, Darrell - we're going to have to agree to disagree about this.
About
> a month ago, I did a relatively in-depth critique of Krauss' inane
comments
> about what's wrong in America, and in that critique, I pointed out that
I'd
> attended a forum some years back when Krauss asked intelligent comments &
> offered intelligent responses. Unfortunately, that's behavior I've not
seen
> from Krauss in quite a few years now.
>
>
>
> You wrote:
>
> "I agree with the sentiment he attempted to express. Why can't we work
with
> the simple rule already expressed in our countries founding document:
treat
> others with basic dignity and decency. "
>
>
>
> The answer to that question seems pretty clear to me: it's because the
dogs
> Krauss & his pals have chosen to lie down with don't believe in treating
> people equally. You know the type: those who think that their
> interpretation of the Bible allows them to condemn the LGBTQ community -
and
> many other groups -- and deny them equal protection under the law. Those
who
> don't support marriage equality and gender equality and equal pay for
equal
> work. Those who think that the government have no business regulating
> weapons but has every right to stick their prurient noses into the
> Constitutionally guaranteed reproductive choices of women.
>
>
>
> I have no idea what Krauss' views are on those issues, but the fact
remains
> that when Krauss voluntarily choose to ally with people who are against
> those Constitutional protections, and then he makes stupid comments (I
> watched the videos Tom posted, so I'm quite aware of the context, which
> isn't quite as bad as the DN article, but still isn't good by any
stretch),
> the push-back is more than deserved.
>
>
>
>
>
> Saundra
>
>
>
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> On Behalf Of Darrell Keim
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:04 AM
> To: Art Deco
> Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Wayne Krauss
>
>
>
> I happened to sit next to Wayne yesterday when someone asked him to
explain
> his remarks. He elaborated that his point was that we shouldn't need to
> have special protections for different groups. We should hold ourselves
to
> the standard of treating all people equally, which our Constitution
already
> guarantees.
>
>
>
> While his quote in the paper makes him sound like an idiot (reporters
have a
> way of doing this-context is SO important), I agree with the sentiment he
> attempted to express. Why can't we work with the simple rule already
> expressed in our countries founding document: treat others with basic
> dignity and decency. The guy is not nearly the troglodyte he is being
made
> out to be.
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Art Deco <art.deco.studios at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Aside from its gross insensitivity and ignorance the remarks provide a
> revelation about Krauss's personal feelings and the lack of comment
implying
> consent by the other semi-conscious officials present, this is part of a
> longer saga.
>
> There is hardly a month that has gone by since he took office and made a
> fool of himself starting with his participation and remarks in the Hawkins
> scandal, that Wayne Krauss hasn't provided ample evidence of the long
> circulating characterization of him that as the former manager of the
> Goodyear store he was hit in the head too hard and too many times with a
> tire iron.
>
>
>
> w.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Saundra Lund <v2020 at ssl1.fastmail.fm>
> wrote:
>
> What a horse's rear end Krauss continues to show himself to be.
Disgusting.
>
>
>
> Here's the article Roger Hayes referred to:
>
>
>
>
> Antidiscrimination ordinance vetted by committee
>
>
> By Brandon Macz, Daily News staff writer | Posted: Tuesday, February 26,
> 2013 12:00 am
>
> Considering an ordinance to make housing and job discrimination based on
> sexual orientation or gender identity a criminal offense in Moscow,
> Councilor Wayne Krauss asked City Attorney Randy Fife where demands for
more
> protections would end.
>
> Krauss asked rhetorically whether someone bringing monkeys into a business
> and being refused service would require a discrimination ordinance for
> monkey owners.
>
> Fife laid out for the Administrative Committee on Monday details of his
> draft ordinance. Under the ordinance, an employer would not be allowed to
> refuse to hire or fire a person for their sexual orientation or gender
> identity, or to deny an employee advancement or training on that same
basis.
> It would also prevent businesses from refusing to serve a person based on
> their sexual orientation or gender identity.
>
> On the housing side, refusal to sell, buy or rent property or to repair,
> maintain or improve it would also be prohibited if it were the result of
> such discrimination, Fife said.
>
> Exceptions include religious entities, other governments and agencies,
> boarding houses, private clubs or institutions and two-family dwellings,
> such as duplexes, where the property owner or a relative lives in one of
the
> units.
>
> Krauss was curious about whether businesses, such as restaurants, which
> often display signs indicating their right to refuse service to anyone,
> could refuse to serve someone based on their sexual orientation or gender
> identity without disclosing that as the reason. Fife said if someone felt
> that was the reason for denial of service, they could file a complaint
under
> the ordinance.
>
> "I hate any kind of bullying whatsoever, and discrimination is a form of
> bullying, in my mind," Krauss said.
>
> Krauss said he didn't like the idea of the city being forced to react to a
> continuous list of discriminatory grievances.
>
> "The question is, where does it stop?" Krauss said. "Why doesn't the 14th
> Amendment cover the whole darn thing?"
>
> The amendment says "No State shall deny to any person within its
> jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
>
> Fife said he prepared the draft after reviewing laws already on the books
in
> Sandpoint, Boise and Salt Lake City and said he favored Boise's. The
> proposed ordinance would fill a gap in the federal and state human rights
> acts.
>
> Anyone believing themselves to be discriminated against because of their
> sexual orientation or gender identity would file a report with the Moscow
> Police Department, Fife said, which would conduct an investigation and
file
> a report with the city prosecutor to validate whether the claim
constitutes
> an offense under the ordinance.
>
> If so, mediation would be attempted between the two parties by the city
> attorney with the offender facing a misdemeanor if a resolution can't be
> met. If the defendant takes remediation steps, the penalty could be
reduced
> to an infraction. Should both parties settle, the charge would be
dismissed.
>
> "You want compliance, not punishment. That's the goal," Fife said, adding
> the criminal process might do better in a separate council resolution.
>
> Fife said pushes on the municipal level could force the issue in the Idaho
> Legislature, which has historically never passed an amendment to its human
> rights act covering sexual orientation and gender identity out of
committee.
>
> "That's not going to happen, so we'll continue to legislate morality,"
> Krauss said.
>
> The draft ordinance will be reviewed by the city's Fair and Affordable
> Housing and Human Rights commissions before returning to the
Administrative
> Committee to forward the draft to the full council.
>
> More Well No. 9 problems
>
> Public Works Director Les MacDonald reported the recently reinstalled Well
> No. 9 pump and motor have to be removed again after testing Friday knocked
> out power to the well house. Once power was restored, a ground fault was
> detected, which means something is short-circuiting the electricity being
> channeled through the pump and motor, he said.
>
> "It means we're in a different situation than before," MacDonald said.
>
> The pump was shut down in June when it stopped functioning and the motor
was
> sent to be repaired by Alstra Technologies in Tempe, Ariz. It was
> reinstalled in late September, but was shut down again when the electric
> current became too high and caused the protection unit to shut it down.
The
> motor was returned to Alstra and the pump was analyzed by a Spokane
company
> before both were tested by another manufacturer in Arizona.
>
> The pump and motor were reinstalled in two weeks ago, but further testing
in
> Moscow showed the electric current was still too high and a "whale song"
> noise occurred when it was reconnected to the system, MacDonald said.
> Following Friday's outage, he said removal of the pump and motor by crane
> began Monday and should be completed today. He added an outside consultant
> may need to be brought in to determine the city's next move. Well No. 9
can
> produce up to 40 percent of the city's water.
>
> _____
>
> Brandon Macz can be reached at (208) 882-5561, ext. 238
> <tel:%28208%29%20882-5561%2C%20ext.%20238> , or by email to
bmacz at dnews.com.
>
>
>
> And, here's the letter to the editor Roger also referred to:
>
>
>
> Basic human rights
>
> Posted: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:00 am
>
> Moscow City Councilor Wayne Krauss has implied that refusing service to
> monkey owners in a business setting is the same as denying fair housing
and
> job rights to residents based on their sexual orientation or gender
> identity.
>
> As reported by Brandon Macz in "Antidiscrimination ordinance vetted,"
(Daily
> News, Feb. 26): "Krauss asked rhetorically whether someone bringing
monkeys
> into a business and being refused service would require a discrimination
> ordinance for monkey owners."
>
> You must be logged in with the proper services to print this article.
>
> Think about what he is really saying.
>
> Also, according to Macz, Krauss questions "legislating morality." Yet
Krauss
> is forcing his own "morality" on public legislation, denying basic human
> rights to a sector of the population that he is being paid to serve.
>
> Please, Krauss, apologize for what you said and rethink your stance.
>
> Lisa Kliger
>
> Moscow
>
>
>
>
>
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> On Behalf Of Rosemary Huskey
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:50 AM
> To: rhayes at frontier.com; 'Moscow Vision 2020'
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Wayne Krauss
>
>
>
> I am gobsmacked about Wayne Krauss' remarks. Where did he make them?
Thank
> you for letting 2020 readers know.
>
> Rose Huskey
>
>
>
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> On Behalf Of rhayes at frontier.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:47 AM
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: [Vision2020] Wayne Krauss
>
>
>
> And yesterday Wayne Krauss was quoted that offering equal protection to
all
> citizens including that of sexual identity and orientation to bringing
> monkeys to a restaurant and demanding service.
>
> In this case crackpot... and a sad reflection on our city council.
>
>
>
> For those with short memories:
>
> On a scale of 0 to 10 where 10 is the easiest to be hornswoggled Carscalen
> and Krauss are clearly 10s based on how Hawkins and Mr. Slime Steed
(acting
> in the conflicting roles of city council person and *defacto* agent of his
> longtime associates Hawkins) hornswoggled the council into the sweetheart
> deal with the now never to be Hawkins mall against the fundamental
> interests of Idaho citizens.
>
> How do you choose a GOP leader? From the crackpots or the corrupt?
>
> w.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
>
>
> --
> Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
> art.deco.studios at gmail.com
>
> <http://users.moscow.com/waf/WP%20Fox%2001.jpg>
>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130227/d593a1f6/attachment.html
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
> End of Vision2020 Digest, Vol 80, Issue 357
> *******************************************
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130227/a6c217c5/attachment.html
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
> End of Vision2020 Digest, Vol 80, Issue 370
> *******************************************
--
Daniel Foucachon
www.foucachon.com
daniel at foucachon.com
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
--
Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
art.deco.studios at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130228/58309d9d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list