[Vision2020] Neo-Classical Republicanism

[Art Deco]

  [image: The New York Times] <http://www.nytimes.com/>

------------------------------
February 13, 2013
Neo-Classical Republicanism By ISHMAEL REED

OAKLAND, Calif.

DURING Tuesday’s State of the Union
address<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/13/us/politics/obamas-2013-state-of-the-union-address.html?_r=0>,
President Obama declared that “Our housing market is healing, our stock
market is rebounding and consumers, patients and homeowners enjoy stronger
protections than ever before.”

Tell that to black Americans, who were hit harder than the rest of the
country by the recession and are having a harder time recovering. That
struggle is not a coincidence, or merely a result of past inequality.
During the housing bubble, blacks were deliberately targeted for subprime
loans: as Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.
said<http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/july-dec11/bankofamerica_12-21.html>,
the big banks committed “systematic discrimination against blacks and
Hispanics.”

One would think that Republicans, so eager to promote wealth building,
would see an opening. Instead, they blamed blacks for the recession,
accusing them, among other things, of taking out risky mortgages they
couldn’t afford.

But the response on the left has been equally frustrating. By advocating
government action as the first response to black unemployment,
“progressive” opinion makers encourage the popular stereotype that blacks
and welfare are virtually synonymous (even though the bulk of handouts go
to red-state whites).

With the Democrats in power and the Republicans at risk of going the way of
the Whigs, according to their former chairman, Michael Steele, maybe the
Republican Party should go back to its beginnings as the party of freedom.

Though Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican president, the party’s
first presidential candidate, in 1856, was the politician and soldier John
C. Frémont<http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=f000374>,
whose campaign promised “free soil” and “free men.” In 1861, as the general
in charge of all territory west of the Mississippi, Frémont issued the
first proclamation emancipating slaves, which Lincoln quickly revoked (the
same Lincoln who frequently used racial epithets).

The Republican Party was influenced by the abolitionist Liberty Party,
whose leading lights included William Lloyd Garrison, Susan B. Anthony and
Frederick Douglass, who later said <http://www.bartleby.com/73/1601.html>:
“I recognize the Republican Party as the sheet anchor of the colored man’s
political hopes and the ark of his safety.”

Likewise, in an 1872 letter to her fellow activist Elizabeth Cady Stanton,
Anthony wrote: “I shall continue to work for the Republican Party ... for
what the party has done and promises to do for women.”

Why can’t that emancipationist sentiment return today? The original
Republicans were born from a challenge to the far right — Lincoln gained
influence by criticizing the Know-Nothing Party, the far right of his time.
The same could happen today, gaining millions of adherents tired of the
right’s racism and the left’s big-government stereotypes. Call it
“neo-Classical Republicanism.”

The door is wide open. As Mr. Obama’s critics on the black left have noted,
blacks haven’t benefited from his presidency as much as other factions of
the Democratic coalition. He’s less of a Malcolm X than a Booker T.
Washington, who would have endorsed the president’s belief that “a rising
tide lifts all boats.”

Yet most of Mr. Obama’s black critics, mainly from academia, want him only
to move further left; they seem to lack confidence in the ability of blacks
to create businesses, when blacks have been operating businesses since
colonial times. Since 1979, when I moved to inner-city Oakland, I’ve
observed the work ethic of those residents holding legitimate low-wage jobs
as well as those engaged in the underground economy.

Why not send retired business leaders into our prisons to tutor those young
criminal entrepreneurs on how to run a legitimate business? They have
business savvy, just lousy lawyers. All they need is a different product.
This would be the perfect project for Mitt Romney; it could become his
legacy.

I also agree with Republicans who say that the public schools have failed
black and Hispanic boys. (Judging from test scores, they’ve failed white
boys, too.) They should do more to promote the successful ones as models.
The English scores at the Oakland Military Institute and the Oakland School
for the Arts, charter schools with a large Hispanic and black enrollment,
exceed those of Oakland public schools.

Republicans should also be more open to programs like that of the educator
and poet Haki Madhubuti, a founder of the Betty Shabazz International
Charter School <http://www.bsics.net/> in Chicago. He focuses on
African-American literature — not just books about black dysfunction,
readily available in the marketplace, but a variety of texts that give
students alternative role models to those provided by the media, who are
too often seen toting semiautomatic weapons.

And Republicans should oppose discrimination against blacks by banks and
mortgage companies, which frequently deny blacks access to loans with which
to begin businesses and purchase homes so that they can develop the equity
toward a nest egg. And since the Republican ideal is a colorblind America,
how about promoting a colorblind criminal justice system?

Rather than running on bizarre suggestions that Mr. Obama was influenced by
his father’s anticolonialism, wouldn’t the billionaires in the Republican
Party get more for their money by embracing proven solutions that address
the real problems of black America?

After all, if the president and the Democrats won’t do it, someone has to.

Ishmael Reed <http://ishmaelreed.org/> is a visiting scholar at the
California College of the Arts and the author, most recently, of the novel
“Juice!” and the essay collection “Going Too Far.”


-- 
Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
art.deco.studios at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130214/66536502/attachment-0001.html>