[Vision2020] Republicans vs. Veterans’ Jobs

[Art Deco]

  [image: The New York Times] <http://www.nytimes.com/>

<http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/printer-friendly&pos=Position1&sn2=336c557e/4f3dd5d2&sn1=84de2ffb/98f1fc94&camp=FSL2012_ArticleTools_120x60_1787510c_nyt5&ad=BOSW_120x60_June13_NoText&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Fbeastsofthesouthernwild>

------------------------------
September 16, 2012
Republicans vs. Veterans’ Jobs

If you made a list of things lawmakers of both parties profess to value at
all times — like “jobs,” “opportunity,” “veterans,” “law enforcement,”
“firefighters,” “safe streets,” “small business” — and plugged them into a
Congressional bill-writing app, you would probably end up with something
like the Veterans Job Corps Act of
2012<http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/bills/112/s3457>.


The bill, sponsored by Senator Patty Murray, a Washington Democrat, would
hire veterans as firefighters and police officers and for conservation jobs
in national parks and on other public lands, through grants to federal
departments and agencies and contracts with state and local governments and
private organizations. It would give a lift to veteran entrepreneurs and
contractors in various ways, like making it easier for veterans to use
their military training to qualify for civilian professional licenses.

The bill gives priority to those who served on or after 9/11, with good
reason: the jobless rate for veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan hit 10.9
percent in August, compared with 8.1 percent nationally. This is a time of
persistent homelessness and unemployment among veterans, and record
suicides among veterans and active-duty service members, many of them
stressed by the burdens of two long wars. It makes sense for the 99 percent
of Americans to find new ways to pay their debt to the 1 percent who serve
in uniform.

To most people, Senator Murray’s bill would seem like one decent way to do
that. But not if you’re one of those Republicans in Washington who thinks
it’s more important in an election year to deny Democrats a success or
accomplishment of any kind.

This has led to some wacky maneuvers in the Senate. Tom Coburn, Republican
of Oklahoma, perhaps forgetting where he worked, denounced the legislation
as a “political exercise.” He also called it a waste of time, since the
House wasn’t going to pass it anyway, and objected to the cost (estimated
at $1 billion for the next five years, though Ms. Murray’s aides say the
program will be paid for by recovering more money from tax-delinquent
Medicare providers and forcing big tax deadbeats to pay up before receiving
passports).

“Where is our honor? Where is our valor? Where is our sacrifice?” thundered
Mr. Coburn, suggesting that giving jobs to veterans was an affront to
American values. Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, went further,
saying he would block the bill until Pakistan freed Shakil Afridi, the
doctor who helped the United States find Osama bin Laden.

Ms. Murray has tried to make her bill as bipartisan as possible. When
Senator Richard Burr, a North Carolina Republican, proposed his own set of
provisions, she folded them all into the bill, which is scheduled for a
vote on Wednesday. We’ll know then whether good sense prevailed, or the
wheels have come completely off the Congressional machine.


-- 
Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
art.deco.studios at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20120917/3fccd6fc/attachment.html>