[Vision2020] The Siren and the Spook

[Art Deco]

  [image: The New York Times] <http://www.nytimes.com/>

------------------------------
November 12, 2012
The Siren and the Spook By FRANK
BRUNI<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/frank_bruni/index.html>

There were remarks galore about her unusually toned arms and the way she
dressed to show them off. I even spotted a comment about how much of her
armpits one of her outfits revealed, as if underarm exhibitionism were some
sort of sexual sorcery, some aphrodisiac, the key to it all.

What else could explain his transgression? Why else would a man of such
outward discipline and outsize achievement risk so much? The temptress must
have been devious. The temptation must have been epic.

That was the tired tone of some of the initial coverage of, and reaction
to, the affair between David Petraeus and Paula Broadwell, which had many
people claiming surprise where there wasn’t cause for any, reverting to
clichés that should be retired and indulging in a sexism we like to think
we’ve moved past.

Broadwell has just 13 percent body fat, according to a recent measurement.
Did you know that? Did you need to? It came up nonetheless. And like so
much else about her — her long-ago coronation as homecoming queen, her
six-minute mile — it was presented not merely as a matter of
accomplishment, but as something a bit titillating, perhaps a part of the
trap she laid.

There are bigger issues here. There are questions of real consequence, such
as why the F.B.I. got so thoroughly involved in what has been vaguely
described as a case of e-mail harassment, whether the bureau waited too
long to tell lawmakers and White House officials about the investigation,
and how much classified information Broadwell, by dint of her relationship
with Petraeus, was privy to. The answers matter.

Her “expressive green eyes” (The Daily Beast) and “tight shirts” and
“form-fitting clothes” (The Washington Post) don’t. And the anecdotes and
chatter that implicitly or explicitly wonder at the spidery wiles she must
have used to throw the mighty man off his path are laughably ignorant of
history, which suggests that mighty men are all too ready to tumble, loins
first. Wiles factor less into the equation than proximity.

Sure, the spotlight these men have attracted and the altitude they’ve
reached should, theoretically, give them greater pause. But they’ve either
become accustomed to or outright sought a kind of adulation in the public
arena that probably isn’t mirrored in their marriages. A spouse is unlikely
to provide it. A spouse knows you too well for that, and gives you
something deeper, truer and so much less electric.

It has to be more than mere coincidence that Bill Clinton had an affair
with a White House intern; Newt Gingrich with a Congressional aide (now his
wife); John Edwards with a woman who followed him around with a camera,
creating hagiographic mini-documentaries about his presidential campaign;
and Petraeus with a woman who made him the subject of a biography so
worshipful that its main riddle, joked Jon
Stewart<http://www.mediaite.com/tv/looking-back-paula-broadwells-january-daily-show-appearance-included-her-husband-push-ups/>,
was whether Petraeus was “awesome or incredibly awesome.”

These mighty men didn’t just choose mistresses, by all appearances. They
chose fonts of gushing reverence. That’s at least as deliberate and
damnable as any signals the alleged temptresses put out.

Petraeus’s choice suggests an additional measure of vanity. Broadwell
exercises compulsively, as he does. She’s fascinated by all matters
military, as he is. “Petraeus once joked I was his avatar,” she
told<http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/11/10/3657970/like-petraeus-charlottes-paula.html#storylink=cpy>The
Charlotte Observer a while back. So by his own assessment, he was
having an affair with a version of himself.

And yet it’s the women in these situations who are often subjected to a
more vigorous public shaming — and assigned greater responsibility.

The Web site Business Insider posted an interview with an unnamed former
colleague of Petraeus’s who knew Broadwell and characterized her as “a
shameless self-promoting prom queen.” The colleague all but exonerated
Petraeus by saying: “You’re a 60-year-old man and an attractive woman
almost half your age makes herself available to you — that would be a test
for anyone.”

The headline of The Washington Post story that weighed in on Broadwell’s
wardrobe asserted that he “let his guard down,” a phrase that portrays him
as passive, possibly even a victim. The story notes that his former aides
considered him “the consummate gentleman and family man.”

It goes on to say that Broadwell was “willing to take full advantage of her
special access” to him.

An article in Slate asked “how could he — this acclaimed leader and figure
of rectitude — *allow* such a thing to a happen?” The italics are mine,
because the verb is a telling one. “She went a bit ga-ga for the general,”
the article later observes, adding: “She may have made herself
irresistible.”

Such adamant women, such pregnable men. We’ve been stuck on this since Eve,
Adam and the Garden of Eden. And it’s true: Eve shouldn’t have been so
pushy with the apple.

But Adam could have had a V8.


-- 
Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
art.deco.studios at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20121113/3756d2af/attachment.html>