[Vision2020] Avista gives cash to oust two N. Idaho incumbents

Paul Rumelhart godshatter at yahoo.com
Thu May 10 13:27:15 PDT 2012


Yep, the highlighted type was what I was referring to.

Paul



________________________________
 From: Art Deco <art.deco.studios at gmail.com>
To: vision2020 at moscow.com 
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Avista gives cash to oust two N. Idaho incumbents
 

The bolded red type [2nd paragraph] in the story confirms your statement.

w.


On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com> wrote:

If Avista's pissed at them, then they must be doing something right.
>
>
>Paul
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Art Deco <art.deco.studios at gmail.com>
>To: vision2020 at moscow.com 
>Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:51 AM
>Subject: [Vision2020] Avista gives cash to oust two N. Idaho incumbents
> 
>
>
> 
>May 10, 2012
>Avista gives cash to oust two N. Idaho incumbents
>Betsy Z. Russell
>The Spokesman-Review 
>Tags:2012 ElectionAvistacampaign financeGeorge EskridgeIdaho electionsShawn Keough 
>BOISE – Avista Corp. is spending thousands of dollars trying to 
unseat two longtime North Idaho legislators, throwing its support behind tea party-backed challengers in next week’s Republican primary.
>Being targeted is state Sen. Shawn Keough, R-Sandpoint, who 
supported unsuccessful efforts to establish a consumer advocate to 
review utility rate requests, and state Rep. George Eskridge, R-Dover, 
who advocates greater diversity in Idaho’s energy supply. Avista opposed both proposals.
>Campaign finance reports filed with the Idaho Secretary of State 
show Avista has given each incumbent’s challenger $1,000 and has given 
$15,000 to three political action committees that are funneling money 
back to the challengers, Danielle Ahrens and Pam Stout. The PACS are 
also sponsoring independent mailers and advertisements critical of 
Keough and Eskridge.
>Neil Colwell, Idaho lobbyist for Avista, acknowledged that while the utility has supported Keough and Eskridge in the past, it now would 
like to see them replaced. But Colwell cautioned against assuming all of the PAC contributions are being used exclusively to try to unseat them.
>“We don’t totally control those PACs or anything,” Colwell said.
>But one of the three, the Greater Education Movement, reported 
spending money to support only one candidate since Jan. 1: Ahrens.
>“We support candidates that are aligned with the interests of our 
customers and our company goals,” Colwell said. “And we just think we’re more in alignment with these challengers than the incumbents.”
>The three PACs are run by Lou Esposito, a highly connected GOP 
political consultant in Boise who was House Speaker Lawerence Denney’s 
pick to serve on Idaho’s legislative redistricting commission last year.
>Ahrens and Stout also reported in-kind donations of $1,000 apiece 
from Esposito’s consulting firm, Spartac Inc., for management services 
and broadcast advertising.
>“I’m not managing their campaigns per se, but I helped them out, 
gave them some advice, helped get them some mailing lists, those kinds 
of issues,” Esposito said. “Building their websites, I gave them some 
help with all of that.”
>The three PACs, which also include the Idaho Land PAC and the Free 
Enterprise PAC, sent $2,500 directly to Ahrens’ campaign and $500 to 
Stout’s. They also sponsored various ads and mailers bashing the 
two incumbents.
>Eskridge, the co-chair of the Legislature’s interim energy 
committee, was at the center of a battle between utilities and others 
two years ago over tax incentives for renewable energy, and he clashed 
with Colwell in the process. “As a constituent, we go to him and explain our position, and request that he support our request,” Colwell said. 
“And instead, he tells us why we should think something different, even 
though this is our business, and why we’re wrong.”
>Eskridge, a sixth-term lawmaker who retired after 25 years with the 
Bonneville Power Administration, including stints as an economist, 
marketer and district manager in several districts, said, “If we’re 
going to keep our energy prices low, we’ve got to have a diversified 
energy supply. We can’t just depend on one supply, like utilities would 
like to do.”
>Stout, Eskridge’s challenger, has made her opposition to wind power 
and other renewables a top campaign issue. “He’s an advocate of the 
alternate power, I definitely am not,” she told The Spokesman-Review in 
an earlier interview.
>Eskridge counters, “I’m supportive of renewable energy only when it’s cheaper than the other alternatives.”
>Avista’s beef with Keough is less clear-cut; Colwell cited her 
support for a consumer advocate in Idaho’s public utility rate-setting 
process. But Keough said, “That bill that I sponsored was over 10 years 
ago.” The measure didn’t pass, but the concept has now been raised again by others; Idaho is one of eight states with no independent utility 
consumer advocate, and the only one in the West.
>Colwell said, “There was talk of introducing that again this year. … I believe she said she wouldn’t sponsor that, but we weren’t at all 
clear on where she was going to come down.”
>Keough said she found Avista’s move “very surprising.” She said, 
“We’ve had a great working relationship” and have worked together for 
years on issues involving Lake Pend Oreille and Priest Lake.
>Idaho limits contributions to candidates to $1,000 per election, 
whether they come from an individual, a PAC or a business. But there’s 
nothing to stop the same contributor from donating to the candidate and 
also to PACs that then funnel money to the candidate, said Deputy Idaho 
Secretary of State Tim Hurst.
>“A lot of the PACs are doing independent expenditures, and they can 
do that,” Hurst said. However, there’s been confusion about reporting 
requirements; the PACs have to report specific candidates they’re 
targeting or backing, with amounts, and many this year haven’t. Hurst 
said the Secretary of State’s office plans to send letters out today to 
all PACs clarifying those requirements.
>“There’s provisions for fining people, but our goal has never been 
to balance the budget – we’re trying to get disclosure,” Hurst said.
>The campaign finance reports filed this week are Idaho voters’ only 
chance to see who’s funding the various campaigns before Tuesday’s 
primary election. Here are highlights of what North Idaho legislative 
candidates’ reports showed in contested races in District 1. Coming 
tomorrow: Districts 2, 3 and 4.
>District 1
>Senate 
>Keough has raised $34,338 for her campaign since Jan. 1, on top of 
the $15,396 she carried over from before, and spent $23,789. She 
received 21 donations from named individuals in her district and 
received 17 maximum $1,000 donations, including contributions from Idaho Power, the Idaho Loggers PAC, the Priest Lake State Lessees 
Association, and $1,000 each from Jack and Mary Jo Ambrosiani 
of Sandpoint.
>Ahrens has raised $13,175 for her campaign since Jan. 1 and spent 
$6,345. She received seven donations from named individuals in her 
district and loaned her campaign $2,000. The $5,000 she raised from 
Avista and the three PACs made up almost 40 percent of her campaign 
funds. She also received a $250 contribution from state schools 
Superintendent Tom Luna, and $1,000 from Rep. Bob Nonini’s PAC, the 
Idaho Association for Good Government.
>House Seat A 
>Rep. Eric Anderson, R-Priest Lake, has raised $25,033 since Jan. 1, 
had $13,067 in the bank before that, spent $17,339 and has $20,762 in 
remaining campaign funds. He received donations from 37 named 
individuals in his district and received 13 $1,000 contributions, 
including from Potlatch Corp., the Idaho Consumer-Owned Utility 
Association and House Assistant Majority Leader Scott Bedke.
>GOP challenger Donna Capurso raised $5,878, spent $5,384 and had 
$494 left at the close of the reporting period. She received donations 
from 18 individuals in the district and got $1,000 donations from both 
Richard Braun of Moyie Springs and the Charles L. Fox Trust.
>GOP challenger Louis Kins raised $500, mostly from three individuals in his district – Janet Conlin, Marjorie Kinne and Anita Perry – and 
spent $852, leaving him $352 in debt.
>House Seat B 
>Eskridge has raised $25,218, on top of the $8,368 he carried over; 
he spent $11,314. He received 14 contributions from named individuals in his district and got 14 $1,000 contributions, including from James 
Livingston of Sandpoint, the Idaho Forest Group, Idaho Realtors PAC and 
the Sandpoint law firm of Elsaesser Jarzabek.
>GOP challenger Pam Stout raised $13,125 and spent $8,847. She’s 
loaned her campaign $6,380, received donations from five named 
individuals in the district and pulled in $1,000 donations from Avista 
and Idaho Power and a $400 contribution from Pacificorp. She also 
reported $2,000 in in-kind contributions from Lorna Finman of Rathdrum 
and Finman’s business, LCF Enterprises.
>Get more news and information at Spokesman.com
>
>-- 
>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
>art.deco.studios at gmail.com
>
>
>=======================================================
>List services made available by First Step Internet,
>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>              http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================
>
>


-- 
Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
art.deco.studios at gmail.com

=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
              http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20120510/8131f283/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list